Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T10:29:15.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Context of Treatment and Therapeutic Alliance: Critical Factors in Court-Mandated Batterer Intervention Programs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2013

Santiago Boira*
Affiliation:
Universidad de Zaragoza (Spain)
María F. del Castillo
Affiliation:
Instituto Aragonés de la Mujer (Spain)
Pablo Carbajosa
Affiliation:
Instituciones Penitenciarias (Spain)
Chaime Marcuello
Affiliation:
Universidad de Zaragoza (Spain)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Santiago Boira. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y del Trabajo. Universidad de Zaragoza. C/ Violante de Hungría, 23. 50009. Zaragoza (España). E-mail: sboira@unizar.es

Abstract

This paper deals with the influence of the therapeutic context in batterer intervention programs. We conducted 2 complementary studies: a descriptive analysis (Study 1) and a qualitative study (Study 2) analyzing the aspects that may help to improve the operation and effectiveness of treatment in a group of men (N = 27) who participated in a program for convicted perpetrators of intimate partner violence. The results show a statistically significant relationship between the therapeutic alliance and the assessment of the usefulness of the program attended by offenders (r = .69, p < .01), and between the therapeutic alliance and the assessment of the usefulness of the program content (r = .43, p < .05). Furthermore, the results of the qualitative analysis show that aspects of the therapeutic context may play an important role for the adhesion of offenders to treatment, increasing their motivation and improving results. It is proposed that future research should provide more in-depth analysis of the elements related to the context of the intervention and therapists’ skills as facilitators of change.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This research was financed by the Oficina de Transferencia de Resultados de Investigación (OTRI) of the Universidad de Zaragoza (project 2019/0316) within the framework of the first collaboration agreement between the Ministerio de Igualdad y la Comunidad Autónoma de Aragón for the development of the pilot project for a re-education program for perpetrators of intimate partner violence.

References

Amor, P. J., Echeburúa, E., & Loinaz, I. (2009). ¿Se puede establecer una clasificación tipológica de los hombres violentos contra su pareja? [Can you establish a typological classification of partner violent men?]. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 9, 519539.Google Scholar
Amozurrutia, J. A., & Marcuello, C. (2011). Excel spreadsheet as a tool for social narrative Analysis. Quality and Quantity, 45, 953967. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11135-010-9406-9 Google Scholar
Babcock, J. C., Green, C. E., & Robie, C. (2004). Does batterers’ treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 10231053. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2002.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, J. P., Khalsa, S. R., & Sharpless, B. A. (2010). The vality of the alliance as a predictor of psychotherapy outcome. In Muran, J. C. & Barber, J. P. (Eds.), The therapeutic alliance. An evidence-based guide to practice (pp. 2943). New York, NY: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
Boira, S. (2010). Hombres maltratadores. Historias de violencia masculina [Male batterers. Stories of male violence] . Zaragoza, Spain: Prensas Universitarias de Zaragoza.Google Scholar
Boira, S., & Jodrá, P. (2010). Psicopatología, características de la violencia y abandonos en programas para hombres violentos con la pareja: Resultados en un dispositivo de intervención [Psychopathology, characteristics of violence and dropout in male batterer treatment programs: Results of an intervention service]. Psicothema, 22, 93599.Google Scholar
Bordin, E. S. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy Theory Research Practice, 16, 252260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0085885 Google Scholar
Brown, P. D., & O’Leary, K. D. (2000). Therapeutic alliance: Predicting continuance and success in group treatment for spouse abuse . Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 340345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-006X.68.2.340 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, P. D., O’Leary, K. D., & Feldbau, S. R. (1997). Dropout in a treatment program for self-referring wife abusing men. Journal of Family Violence, 12, 365387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1021906825073 Google Scholar
Buchbinder, E., & Eisikovits, Z. (2008). Doing treatment: Batterers’ experience of intervention. Children and Youth Services Review, 30, 616630. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2008.01.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carbajosa, P., Boira, S. & Tomás-Aragonés, L. (2013). Difficulties, skills and therapy strategies in interventions with court-ordered batterers in Spain. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18, 118124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.11.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbella, S., & Botella, L. (2003). La alianza terapéutica: Historia, investigación y evaluación [Therapeutic alliance: History, research and assessment]. Anales de Psicología, 19, 205221.Google Scholar
Corbella, S., Botella, L., Gómez, A. M., Herrero, O., & Pacheco, M. (2011). Características psicométricas de la versión española del Working Alliance Inventory-Short (WAI-S) [Psychometric properties of Spanish version of Working Alliance Inventory-Short (WAI-S)]. Anales de Psicología, 27, 298301.Google Scholar
Corvo, K., Dutton, D., & Chen, W. (2008). Toward evidence-based practice with domestic violence perpetrators. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment y Trauma, 16, 111130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10926770801921246 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Echeburúa, E., & Fernández-Montalvo, J. (2009). Evaluación de un programa de tratamiento en prisión de hombres condenados por violencia grave contra la pareja [Evaluation of a treatment program in prison for men convicted of serious intimate partner violence]. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 9, 520.Google Scholar
Echeburúa, E., Sarasua, B., Zubizarreta, I., Amor, P. J., & Corral, P. (2010). Variables predictoras del rechazo, abandono y fracaso terapéutico en hombres violentos contra su pareja tratados psicológicamente en un marco comunitario [Predictors of rejection, abandonment and therapeutic failure in partner violent men psychologically treated in a community setting]. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 10, 403420.Google Scholar
Echeburúa, E., Sarasua, B., Zubizarreta, I., & Corral, P. (2009). Evaluación de la eficacia de un tratamiento cognitivo-conductual para hombres violentos contra la pareja en un marco comunitario: Una experiencia de 10 años (1997–2007) [Evaluating the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral treatment for partner violent men in a community setting: A 10-year experience (1997–2007)]. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 9, 199217.Google Scholar
Feder, L., & Wilson, D. B. (2005). A meta-analytic review of court-mandated batterer intervention programs: Can courts affect abusers’ behavior? Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 239262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11292-005-1179-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Montalvo, J., López-Goñi, J. J., & Arteaga, A. (2011). Tratamiento de agresores contra la pareja en programas de atención a drogodependientes: Un reto de futuro [Addressing intimate partner violence in substance-abuse treatment programs: A challenge for the future]. Adicciones, 23, 59.Google Scholar
Kelly, J. B., & Johnson, M. P. (2008). Differentiation among types of intimate partner violence: Research update and Implications for interventions. Family Court Review, 46, 476499. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1617.2008.00215.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (2010). Controversies involving gender and intimate partner violence in the United States. Sex Roles, 62, 179193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9628-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loinaz, I., & Echeburúa, E. (2010). Necesidades terapéuticas en agresores de pareja según su perfil diferencial [Therapeutic needs of partner-violent men according to their differential profile]. Clínica Contemporánea, 1, 8595. http://dx.doi.org/10.5093/cc2010v1n2a2 Google Scholar
Loinaz, I., Torrubia, R., Echeburúa, E., Navarro, J. C., & Fernández, L. (2009). Implicaciones de las tipologías de agresores de pareja para el tratamiento en prisión [Implications of intimate partner violence perpetrators’ typologies for the treatment in prison]. Cuadernos de Medicina Psicosomática y Psiquiatría de Enlace, 91, 1925.Google Scholar
Muran, C., & Barber, J. P. (Eds.) (2010). The therapeutic alliance. An evidence-based guide to practice. New York, NY: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, C. M., & Ting, L. A. (2010). Interventions for perpetrators of intimate partner violence: A review of efficacy research and recent trends. Partner Abuse, 1, 2644. http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.1.1.26 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musser, P. H., & Murphy, C. M. (2009). Motivational interviewing with perpetrators of intimate partner abuse. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65, 12181231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20642 Google Scholar
Pérez, M., & Martínez, M. (2010). La reincidencia de los condenados por delitos de violencia de género a programas formativos aplicados desde la ejecución penal en la comunidad [The recidivism of convicted partner violent men in training programs implemented since criminal enforcement in the community] . Barcelona, Spain: Centro de Estudios Jurídicos y Formación Especializada.Google Scholar
Piper, W. E., & Ogrodniczuk, J. S. (2010). The therapeutic alliance in group therapy. In Muran, J. C. & Barber, J. P. (Eds.), The therapeutic alliance. An evidence-based guide to practice (pp. 263282). New York, NY: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
Prochaska, J., & DiClemente, C. (1986). The transtheoretical approach. In Norcross, J. (Eds.), Handbock of eclectic psychoterapy (pp. 163200). New York, NY: Brumer/Mazel.Google Scholar
Quinteros, A. (2010). Tratamiento psicológico a hombres que ejercen violencia de género: Criterios básicos para elaborar un protocolo de intervención [Psychological treatment for men who commit gender-based violence: Basic criteria to develop an intervention plan]. Clínica Contemporánea, 1, 129139. http://dx.doi.org/10.5093/cc2010v1n2a6 Google Scholar
Quinteros, A., & Carbajosa, P. (2008). Hombres maltratadores. Tratamiento psicológico de agresores [Male abusers. Psychological treatment of offenders] . Madrid, Spain: Editorial Grupo 5.Google Scholar
Rondeau, G., Brodeur, N., Brochu, S., & Lemire, G. (2001). Dropout and completion of treatment among spouse abusers. Violence and Victims, 16, 127143.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, M. (2003). Voices from the group: Domestic violence offenders’ experience of intervention. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment y Trauma, 7, 305317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J146v07n01_13 Google Scholar
Ross, E., Polaschek, D., & Ward, T. (2008). The therapeutic alliance: A theoretical revision for offender rehabilitation. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13, 462480. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2008.07.003 Google Scholar
Ruiz, S., Negredo, L., Ruiz, A., García-Moreno, C., Herrero, O., Yela, M., & Pérez, M. (2010). Violencia de Género. Programa de Intervención para Agresores (PRIA) [Gender Violence. Batterers Intervention Program (PRIA)] . Madrid, Spain: Secretaría General de Instituciones Penitenciarias.Google Scholar
Sartin, R. M., Hansen, D. J., & Huss, M. T. (2006). Domestic violence treatment response and recidivism: A review and implications for the study of family violence. Aggression y Violent Behavior, 11, 425440. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2005.12.002 Google Scholar
Saunders, D. G. (2008). Group interventions for men who batter: A summary of program descriptions and research. Violence and Victims, 23, 156172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.23.2.156 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiles, W. B., & Goldsmith, J. Z. (2010). The alliance over time. In Muran, J. C. & Barber, J. P. (Eds.), The therapeutic alliance. An evidence-based guide to practice (pp. 4462). New York, NY: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
Taft, C. T., & Murphy, C. M. (2007). The working alliance in intervention for partner violence perpetrators: Recent research and theory. Journal of Family Violence, 22, 1118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10896-006-9053-z Google Scholar
Taft, C. T., Murphy, C. M., King, D. W., Musser, P. H., & DeDeyn, J. M. (2003). Process and treatment adherence factors in group cognitive-behavioral therapy for partner violent men. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 812820. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.71.4.812 Google Scholar
Taft, C. T., Murphy, C. M., Musser, P. H., & Remington, N. A. (2004). Personality, interpersonal, and motivational predictors of the working alliance in group cognitive-behavioral therapy for partner violent Men. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 349354. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.72.2.349 Google Scholar
Tracey, T. J., & Kokotovic, A. M. (1989). Factor structure of the Working Alliance Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 1, 207210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//1040-3590.1.3.207 Google Scholar