Skip to main content Accessibility help

Research Participation Improves Student's Exam Performance

  • Beatriz Gil-Gómez de Liaño (a1), Orfelio G. León (a1) and David Pascual-Ezama (a2)


Although there have been several attempts to explore for beneficial effects of research participation in social sciences, most of them have mainly explored satisfaction and students learning perceptions (e.g., Bowman & Waite, 2003). Very few works have studied learning by measuring exam performance. Moreover, participation has been usually conceptualized as a mixture of active and passive participation, including in the same measure different practices such as filling up questionnaires, running experiments or reading and answering questions about a journal article or a scientific conference. The present work tries to determine if there is an advantage due to research participation comparing exam performance, satisfaction and perceived learning of the matter Research Methods in Psychology, in three different groups (non-participating, passive and active participating). As we can see in the results, the mere participation benefits exam performance. Results are discussed in terms of the use of research participation as a new powerful active method in education.

Aunque ha habido varios intentos por estudiar los posibles efectos beneficiosos de la participación en investigaciones en ciencias sociales, la mayoría de ellos han estudiado la satisfacción y la percepción de aprendizaje de los alumnos (e.g., Bowman & Waite, 2003), y muy pocos trabajos han tomado medidas del rendimiento en los exámenes. Además, la participación ha sido habitualmente conceptualizada como una mezcla entre participación activa y pasiva, incluyendo en la misma medida prácticas muy distintas tales como rellenar cuestionarios, pasar experimentos o leer y responder a una serie de cuestiones sobre un artículo o una conferencia científica. El presente trabajo pretende determinar si existe beneficio en el rendimiento en un examen, la satisfacción y el aprendizaje percibido por los alumnos en la materia de Métodos de investigación en psicología, en tres grupos distintos (grupo de no participación, participación pasiva y participación activa) gracias a la participación en una investigación en psicología. Como se puede ver en los resultados, la mera participación beneficia la ejecución en el examen. Los resultados son discutidos en términos del uso de la participación de nuestros estudiantes en investigaciones, como un nuevo y potente método activo de educación.


Corresponding author

Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Beatriz Gil-Gómez de Liaño. Dpto. Psicología Social y Metodología, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. C/ Ivan Pavlov, 6, 28049 Madrid (Spain). Email:


Hide All
Barr, R., & Tagg, J. (1995). A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change: The magazine of Higher Learning, November/December. Heldref Publications.
Bowman, L. L., & Waite, B. M. (2003). Volunteering in research: Student satisfaction and educational benefits. Teaching of Psychology, 30, 102106.
Britton, B. K. (1979). Ethical and educational aspects of participating as a subject in psychology experiments. Teaching of Psychology, 6, 195198.
Chang, C. C. (2008). Enhancing self-perceived effects using Web-based portfolio assessment. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 17531771
Cheng, E. K., Rhee, J. A., Baik, Y. H., & Os, A. (2009). The effect of team based learning in medical ethics education. Medical Teacher, 31, 10131017.
Coulter, X. (1986). Academic value of research participation by undergraduates. American Psychologist, 41, 317.
Darling, J., Goedert, K., Ceynar, M., Shore, W., & Anderson, D. (2007). Learning about the means to the end: What US Introductory Psychology students report about experimental participation. Psychology, Learning and Teaching, 6, 9197.
Diseth, Å., Pallesen, S., Brunborg, G. S., & Larsen, S. (2010). Academic achievement among first semester undergraduate psychology students: the role of course experience, effort, motives and learning strategies. Higher Education, 59, 335352.
Dunbar, K. (1995). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In Sternberg, R. J. & Davidson, J. E. (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 365395). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Elliott, L. J., Rice, S., Trafimow, D., Madson, L., & Hipshur, M. F. (2010). Research participation versus classroom lecture: a comparison of student learning. Teaching of Psychology, 37, 129131.
Falk, H., & Yarden, A. (2009). “Here the scientists explain what I said.” Coordination practices elicited during the enactment of the results and discussion sections of adapted primary literature. Research in Science Education, 39, 349383.
García, M. V., Alvarado, J. M., & Jiménez, A. (2000). La predicción del rendimiento académico: regresión lineal versus regresión logística. [The prediction of academic performance: linear regression versus logistic regression] Psicothema, 12, 248252.
Greenhow, C., Robelia, B., & Hughes, J. E. (2009).Learning, teaching and scholarship in a digital age. Web 2.0 and classroom research: What path should we take now? Educational Researcher, 38, 246259.
Hapgood, S., Magnusson, S. J., & Palinscar, A. S. (2004). Teacher, text, and experience: A case of young children's scientific inquiry. The Journal of the Learning of Sciences, 13, 455505.
House, J. D., Hurst, R. S., & Keely, E. J. (1996).Relacionship between learner attitudes, prior achievement, and performance in a general education course: A multi-institutional study. International Journal of Instructional Media, 23, 257271.
King, D. J. (1970). The subject pool. American Psychologist, 25, 11791181.
Landrum, R. E., & Chastain, G. (1995). Experiment spot-checks: Amethod for assessing the educational value of undergraduate participation in research. IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research, 17, 46.
Miller, A. (1981). Asurvey of introductory psychology subject pool practices among leading universities. Teaching of Psychology, 8, 211213.
Nalesnik, S. W., Heaton, J. O., Olsen, C. H., Haffner, W. H. J., & Zahn, C. M. (2004). Incorporating problem based learning into obstetrics/gynecology clerkship: Impact on student satisfaction and grades, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 190, 13751381.
Ochsendor, F. R., Boehncke, W. H., Sommerlad, M., & Kaufmann, R. (2006). Interactive large group teaching in a dermatology course. Medical Teacher, 28, 697701.
Padilla-Walker, L. M., Zamboanga, B. L., Thompson, R. A., & Schmersal, L. A. (2005). Extra credit as incentive for voluntary research participation. Teaching of Psychology, 32, 150153.
Padilla-Walker, L. M. (2006). The impact of daily extra credit quizzes on exam performance. Teaching of Psychology, 33, 236239.
Rau, W., & Durand, A. (2000). The academic ethic and college grades: Does hard work help students to “make the grade”? Sociology of Education, 73, 1938.
Rosell, M. C., Beck, D. M., Luther, K. E., Goedert, K. M., Shore, W. J., & Anderson, D. A. (2005). Progression of students' knowledge about psychology: The value of experimental participation paired with course content. Teaching of Psychology, 32, 9599.
Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1975). The volunteer subject. New York, NY: Wiley.
Touron, J. (1983). The determinants of factors related to academic achievement in the university: Implications for the selection and counseling of students. Higher Education, 12, 399410.
Trafimow, D., Madson, L., & Gwizdowski, I. (2006).Introductory psychology students' perceptions of alternatives to research participation. Teaching of Psychology, 33, 247249.
Williams, J. B., & Jacobs, J. (2004). Exploring the use of blogs as learning spaces in the higher education. Australasian Journal of Education Technology, 20, 232247.
Wilson, R. L., & Hardgrave, B. C. (1995). Predicting graduate student success in an MBA program: Regression versus classification. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 186195.


Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Research Participation Improves Student's Exam Performance

  • Beatriz Gil-Gómez de Liaño (a1), Orfelio G. León (a1) and David Pascual-Ezama (a2)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.