Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-pn7tm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-11T01:55:36.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Where Politicians Gave Power to the People: Adoption of the Citizen Initiative in the U.S. States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Amy Bridges  and
Thad Kousser
Amy Bridges*
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
Thad Kousser
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
*
Amy Bridges, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., SSB 389, San Diego, CA 92093 Email: abridges@ucsd.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

What led elites in some U.S. states to surrender policy-making power to voters between 1898 and 1918, while leaders elsewhere retained only representative democracy? The authors argue that progressives behaved as strategic politicians by supporting direct democracy when they were stymied at achieving their goals in the legislature and were confident that the voters who would be empowered by initiatives that agreed with progressive policies. They made their delegation of power conditional on who would receive it. The presence of these underlying conditions made adoption of the citizen initiative likely, the authors posit, while the timing of reforms came when insurgent reformers had a strong presence in state government, when the results of a galvanizing election sent a clear signal, or when the adoption of the initiative in one state diffused to its neighbors. Exploring these hypotheses by analyzing a new data set, the authors find strong support for their expectations about the conditions that created fertile ground for direct democracy.

Keywords

direct democracyinitiativereformprogressiveWest

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , June 2011 , pp. 167 - 197
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Achen, Christopher H., and Bartels, Larry M.. 2007. “Tumbling Down into a Democratical Republic.” Paper presented at the 2007 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science, Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Bakken, Gordon. 1978. “The Arizona Constitutional Convention of 1910.” Arizona State Law Journal 10:1–3.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, Katz, Jonathan N., and Tucker, Richard. 1998. “Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series—Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable.” American Journal of Political Science 42:1260–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowler, Shaun, and Donovan, Todd. 2006. “Direct Democracy and Political Parties in America.” Party Politics 12:649–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowler, Shaun, Donovan, Todd, and Lawrence, Eric D.. 2005. “Choosing Direct Democracy: On the Creation of Initiative Institutions in the American States.” Paper presented at the 2005 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Bowler, Shaun, Donovan, Todd, and Tolbert, Caroline J.. 1998. Citizens as Legislators: Direct Democracy in the United States. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Bridges, Amy. 1997. Morning Glories: Municipal Reform in the Southwest. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bridges, Amy, and Kousser, Thad. 2005. “The Indirect Goals of Direct Democracy Reforms.” Paper presented at the 2005 Annual Meeting of the Social Science History Association, Portland, OR.Google Scholar
Bridges, Amy, and Kronick, Richard. 1999. “Writing the Rules to Win the Game: The Middle Class Regimes of Municipal Reformers.” Urban Affairs Review 34:691–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broder, David S. 2000. Democracy Derailed: Initiative Campaigns and the Power of Money. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
Buenker, John D. 1973. Urban Liberalism and Progressive Reform. New York: Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar
Burnham, Walter Dean. 1984. “Partisan Division of American State Governments, 1834–1985.” ICPSR 0016. University of MichiganCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnham, Walter Dean, and Flanigan, William. 1984. “State-Level Presidential Election Data for the United States, 1824–1972.” ICPSR 0019. University of MichiganCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly, James J. 1998 The Triumph of Ethnic Progressivism: Urban Political Culture in Boston 1900 –1925. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
David, Paul T., and Eisenberg, Ralph. 1961. Devaluation of the Urban and Suburban Vote: A Statistical Investigation of Long-Term Trends in State Legislative Representation. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
de Figueiredo, Rui J. P. Jr. 2003. “Budget Institutions and Political Insulation: Why States Adopt the Item Veto.” Journal of Public Economics 87:2677–2701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donovan, Todd. 2005. “From Corruption, Virtue? Populist and Progressive Roots of Direct Democracy in the Pacific Northwest.” Paper presented at the Direct Democracy in the American West: Historical Roots and Political Realities Conference, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
Ellis, Richard J. 2002. Democratic Delusions: The Initiative Process in America. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Evans, Tony Howard. 1966. “Oregon Progressive Reform, 1902–1914.” PhD diss., University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Finegold, Kenneth. 1995. Experts and Politicians: Reform Challenges to Machine Politics in New York, Cleveland, and Chicago. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fritz, Christian. 1994. “The American Constitutional Tradition Revisited: Preliminary Observations on State Constitution-Making in the Nineteenth-Century West.” Rutgers Law Journal 25:945–98.Google Scholar
Gerber, Elizabeth. 1996. “Legislative Response to the Threat of Popular Initiatives.” American Journal of Political Science 40:99–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Campbell. 1998. “Population of the 100 Largest Cities and Other Urban Places in the United States: 1790 to 1990.” U.S. Census Bureau Working Paper No. 27. http://www.census.gov/population/www/documentation/twps0027.html (Accessed June 2007).Google Scholar
Goble, Danney. 1980. Progressive Oklahoma: The Making of a New Kind of State. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Goebel, Thomas. 2002. A Government by the People: Direct Democracy in America, 1890–1940. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Grantham, Dewey W. 1983. Southern Progressivism: The Reconciliation of Progress and Tradition. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
Hanssen, F. Andrew. 2004. “Is There a Politically Optimal Level of Judicial Independence?” American Economic Review 94:712–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrick, Burton J. 1911. “The Initiative and Referendum and How Oregon Got Them.” McClure's Magazine 38:235–48.Google Scholar
Hicks, John. [1924] 1990. The Constitutions of the Northwest States. Buffalo, NY: John S. Hein.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard. 1955. The Age of Reform: From Bryan to F.D.R. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Holli, Melvin G. 1969. Reform in Detroit, Hazen S. Pingree and Urban Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Huthmacher, J. Joseph. 1962. “Urban Liberalism and the Age of Reform.” Mississippi Valley Historical Review 44:231–41.Google Scholar
Initiative and Referendum Institute. 2005. “States with Direct (DA) and Indirect (IDA) Initiative Amendments.” http://www.iandrinstitute.org/statewide_i%26r.htm (Accessed September 2005).Google Scholar
Johnson, Jerome Lewis. 1912. “Direct Democracy as an Ally of Representative Government.” In The Initiative, Referendum, and Recall, ed. Munro, William Bennett. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
Kearney, Sharon Faye. 1977. “Arizona Legislature 1912–1914: A Study of State Progressivism.” MA thesis, California State University, Fullerton.Google Scholar
Keefe, William J. 1998. Parties, Politics, and Public Policy in America. 8th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Kernell, Samuel. 2005. “The Responsiveness of State Legislative Elections during the Late 19th and Early 20th Centuries.” Paper presented at the 2005 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Keyssar, Alexander. 2000. The Right to Vote: The Contested History of Democracy in the United States. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Kousser, J. Morgan. 1974. The Shaping of Southern Politics, Suffrage Restriction and the Establishment of the One-Party South, 1880–1910. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lascher, Edward L. Jr., Hagen, Michael G., and Rochlin, Steven A.. 1996. “Gun behind the Door? Ballot Initiatives, State Policies and Public Opinion.” Journal of Politics 58:760–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, Eric D., Donovan, Todd, and Bowler, Shaun. 2009. “Adopting Direct Democracy: Tests of Competing Explanations of Institutional Change.” American Politics Research 37:1024–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marschall, Melissa J., and Ruhil, Anirudh V. S.. 2005. “Fiscal Effects of the Voter Initiative Reconsidered: Addressing Endogeneity.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 5:327–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsusaka, John G. 2004. For the Many or the Few: The Initiative, Public Policy, and American Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsusaka, John G. 2005a. “Direct Democracy Works.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 19:185–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsusaka, John G. 2005b. “The Endogeneity of the Initiative: A Comment on Marschall and Ruhil.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 5:356–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1986. Placing Parties in American Politics: Organization, Electoral Settings, and Government Activity in the Twentieth Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClintock, Thomas C. 1967. “Seth Lewelling, William S. U'Ren and the Birth of the Oregon Progressive Movement.” Oregon Historical Quarterly 68:197–220.Google Scholar
Miller, Worth Robert. 1986. “Building a Progressive Coalition in Texas: The Populist-Reform Democrat Rapprochement, 1900–1907.” Journal of Southern History 52:163–82.Google Scholar
Mowry, George E. [1951] 1963. The California Progressives. Chicago: Quadrangle Books.Google Scholar
Persily, Nathan A. 1997. “The Peculiar Geography of Direct Democracy: Why the Initiative, Referendum and Recall Developed in the American West.” Michigan Law and Public Policy Review 2:11–41.Google Scholar
Piott, Steven L. 2003. Giving Voters a Voice: The Origins of the Initiative and Referendum in America. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.Google Scholar
Price, Charles M. 1975. “The Initiative: A Comparative State Analysis and Reassessment of a Western Phenomenon.” Western Political Quarterly 28:243–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roeder, Richard Brown. 1971. “Montana in the Early Years of the Progressive Period.” PhD diss., University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Sanders, Elizabeth. 1999. Roots of Reform: Farmers, Workers, and the American State 1877–1917. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sarasohn, David. 1989. The Party of Reform, Democrats in the Progressive Era. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.Google Scholar
Schrag, Peter. 1999. Paradise Lost: California's Experience, America's Future. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Shefter, Martin. 1994. Political Parties and the State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Daniel A., and Fridkin, Dustin. 2008. “Delegating Direct Democracy: Interparty Legislative Competition and the Adoption of the Initiative in the American States.” American Political Science Review 102:333–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Daniel A., and Tolbert, Caroline J.. 2004. Educated by Initiative: The Effects of Direct Democracy on Citizens and Political Organizations in the American States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Mark A. 2001. “The Contingent Effects of Ballot Initiatives and Candidate Races on Turnout.” American Journal of Political Science 45:700–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobel, Robert, and Raimo, John. 1978. Directory of Governors of the United States. Westport, CT: Meckler Books.Google Scholar
Sullivan, James William. 1893. Direct Legislation by the Citizenship through the Initiative and Referendum. New York: True Nationalist.Google Scholar
Tinsley, James Aubrey. 1953. “The Progressive Movement in Texas.” PhD diss., University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Tolbert, Caroline J., Grummel, John A., and Smith, Daniel A.. 2001. “The Effects of Ballot Initiatives on Voter Turnout in the American States.” American Politics Research 29:625–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomz, Michael, Wittenberg, Jason, and King, Gary. 2001. “CLARIFY: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results.” http://GKing.Harvard.edu (Accessed October 2005.).Google Scholar
Trounstine, Jessica. 2008. Political Monopolies in American Cities: The Rise and Fall of Bosses and Reformers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1950. 1950 Census of Agriculture. Vol. 2. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1906. U.S. Census of Religious Bodies, State File, 1906. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1910. http://www.thearda.com/Archive/Files/Descriptions/1906CENSST.asp (Accessed October 2005).Google Scholar
Wilson, Woodrow. 1912. “The Issues of Reform.” In The Initiative, Referendum, and Recall, ed. Munro, William Bennett. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
Wright, James Edward. 1987. The Progressive Yankees: Republican Reformers in New Hampshire, 1906–1916. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.Google Scholar