Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 19
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Bateman, David A. and Lapinski, John 2016. Ideal Points and American Political Development: Beyond DW-NOMINATE. Studies in American Political Development, p. 1.


    Clark, Gabrielle E. 2016. From the Panama Canal to Post-Fordism: Producing Temporary Labor Migrants Within and Beyond Agriculture in the United States (1904-2013). Antipode, p. n/a.


    Walker, Alexis N. 2014. Labor's Enduring Divide: The Distinct Path of Public Sector Unions in the United States. Studies in American Political Development, Vol. 28, Issue. 02, p. 175.


    Wawro, Gregory J. and Katznelson, Ira 2014. Designing Historical Social Scientific Inquiry: How Parameter Heterogeneity Can Bridge the Methodological Divide between Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 58, Issue. 2, p. 526.


    Weatherford, M. Stephen 2014. The Eisenhower Transition: Labor Policy in the New Political Economy. Studies in American Political Development, Vol. 28, Issue. 02, p. 201.


    Baylor, Christopher A. 2013. First to the Party: The Group Origins of the Partisan Transformation on Civil Rights, 1940–1960. Studies in American Political Development, Vol. 27, Issue. 02, p. 111.


    Gitterman, Daniel P. 2013. Remaking a Bargain: The Political Logic of the Minimum Wage in the United States. Poverty & Public Policy, Vol. 5, Issue. 1, p. 3.


    Jenkins, Jeffery A. and Peck, Justin 2013. Building Toward Major Policy Change: Congressional Action on Civil Rights, 1941–1950. Law and History Review, Vol. 31, Issue. 01, p. 139.


    Farhang, Sean 2012. Legislative-Executive Conflict and Private Statutory Litigation in the United States: Evidence from Labor, Civil Rights, and Environmental Law. Law & Social Inquiry, Vol. 37, Issue. 3, p. 657.


    Katznelson, Ira and Mulroy, Quinn 2012. Was the South Pivotal? Situated Partisanship and Policy Coalitions during the New Deal and Fair Deal. The Journal of Politics, Vol. 74, Issue. 2, p. 604.


    Berinsky, Adam J. Powell, Eleanor Neff Schickler, Eric and Yohai, Ian Brett 2011. Revisiting Public Opinion in the 1930s and 1940s. PS: Political Science & Politics, Vol. 44, Issue. 03, p. 515.


    Johnson, Kimberley S. 2011. Racial Orders, Congress, and the Agricultural Welfare State, 1865–1940. Studies in American Political Development, Vol. 25, Issue. 02, p. 143.


    Schickler, Eric and Caughey, Devin 2011. Public Opinion, Organized Labor, and the Limits of New Deal Liberalism, 1936–1945. Studies in American Political Development, Vol. 25, Issue. 02, p. 162.


    Disalvo, Daniel 2010. The Politics of a Party Faction: The Liberal-Labor Alliance in the Democratic Party, 1948–1972. Journal of Policy History, Vol. 22, Issue. 03, p. 269.


    Dixon, Marc 2010. Union Threat, Countermovement Organization, and Labor Policy in the States, 1944–1960. Social Problems, Vol. 57, Issue. 2, p. 157.


    Schickler, Eric Pearson, Kathryn and Feinstein, Brian D. 2010. Congressional Parties and Civil Rights Politics from 1933 to 1972. The Journal of Politics, Vol. 72, Issue. 3, p. 672.


    William Domhoff, G. 2007. C. Wright Mills, Power Structure Research, and the Failures of Mainstream Political Science. New Political Science, Vol. 29, Issue. 1, p. 97.


    Filardo, Peter Meyer 2006. Labor HistoryBibliography 2005. Labor History, Vol. 47, Issue. 3, p. 361.


    Skrentny, John D. 2006. Law and the American State. Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 32, Issue. 1, p. 213.


    ×

The Southern Imposition: Congress and Labor in the New Deal and Fair Deal

  • Sean Farhang (a1) and Ira Katznelson (a2)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0898588X05000015
  • Published online: 01 April 2005
Abstract

In this article, we will probe two distinct historical questions. First, we explore why congressional representatives from the South, who had generally supported the Democratic Party on labor issues during the 1930s, joined with Republicans to oppose the party's pro-labor orientation in the 1940s. We also examine why the class-based union movement that mobilized so assertively after the passage of the Wagner Act in 1935 became so cramped and pragmatic by the early 1950s. These puzzles, we believe, are closely related. Our explanation for why labor's horizons, topography, and prospects constricted to workplace issues, to some segments of the working population, and to limited geographic areas by the end of the Truman years points to how southern Democrats shaped the main institutions produced by New Deal and Fair Deal labor legislation.

Copyright
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Studies in American Political Development
  • ISSN: 0898-588X
  • EISSN: 1469-8692
  • URL: /core/journals/studies-in-american-political-development
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×