Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 4
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Hertel-Fernandez, Alexander 2016. Explaining Durable Business Coalitions in U.S. Politics: Conservatives and Corporate Interests across America's Statehouses. Studies in American Political Development, Vol. 30, Issue. 01, p. 1.

    Galvin, Daniel J. 2014. Presidents as Agents of Change. Presidential Studies Quarterly, Vol. 44, Issue. 1, p. 95.

    Mudge, Stephanie L. and Chen, Anthony S. 2014. Political Parties and the Sociological Imagination: Past, Present, and Future Directions. Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 40, Issue. 1, p. 305.

    Praça, Sérgio and Taylor, Matthew M. 2014. Inching Toward Accountability: The Evolution of Brazil's Anticorruption Institutions, 1985-2010. Latin American Politics and Society, Vol. 56, Issue. 2, p. 27.

  • Studies in American Political Development, Volume 26, Issue 1
  • April 2012, pp. 50-70

The Transformation of Political Institutions: Investments in Institutional Resources and Gradual Change in the National Party Committees

  • Daniel J. Galvin (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 30 March 2012

Institutional theorists have made major progress in recent years examining gradual processes of endogenous institutional change. Building on this line of theorizing, this article highlights an often overlooked source of incremental change in political institutions: investments in institutional resources. Unlike path-dependent processes, which are relatively open at the front end and relatively closed at the back end, resource investments made in one period serve to widen an institution's path and enhance its capacity to undertake a broader range of activities in subsequent periods. Drawn out over time, these investments can gradually transform institutional operations and purposes. To illustrate these dynamics, this article reconsiders the transformation of the national party committees into “parties in service” to their candidates. The most influential theoretical explanation for this change is supplied by actor-centered functionalist accounts that either ignore the parties' institutional forms or treat them as mere reflections of actors' preferences. As an alternative, I suggest that investments in two types of institutional resources—human resources and information assets—were integral to the process through which each party changed. Piecemeal investments in these resources gradually enabled each national party committee to provide a wider range of campaign services to its candidates, thereby producing ostensibly new “functions” over time. Though the process of institutional change unfolded at very different times in each party, the same dynamics were on display in both cases.

Corresponding author
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Elisabeth S. Clemens and James M. Cook , “Politics and Institutionalism: Explaining Durability and Change,” Annual Review of Sociology 25 (1999): 441–66

Kathleen Thelen , “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics,” Annual Review of Political Science 2 (1999): 369404

James Mahoney , “Path Dependence in Historical Sociology,” Theory and Society 29 (2000): 507–48

Paul Pierson , Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004)

Peter Hall and Rosemary Taylor , “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms,” Political Studies 44 (1996)

William H. Sewell , “A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation,” American Journal of Sociology 98 (1992): 19

Cornelius Cotter and John F. Bibby , “Institutional Development of Parties and the Thesis of Party Decline,” Political Science Quarterly 95 (1980): 127.

Paul S. Herrnson , Party Campaigning in the 1980s (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988)

John Aldrich , Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995)

Jeffrey R. Lax and Justin H. Phillips , “The Democratic Deficit in the States,” American Journal of Political Science 56 (2012)

David W. Rohde , Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991)

Daniel M. Shea , “The Passing of Realignment and the Advent of the 'Base-Less' Party System,” American Politics Quarterly 27 (1999)

Marty Cohen , David Karol , Hans Noel , and John Zaller , The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations before and after Reform (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008)

Seth E. Masket , No Middle Ground: How Informal Party Organizations Control Nominations and Polarize Legislatures (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2009)

C.A.H. Thomson , “Research and the Republican Party,” Public Opinion Quarterly 3 (1939): 306–13.

Carlton G. Ketchum , “Political Financing, 1937 Model,” Public Opinion Quarterly 2 (1938): 136–37.

Cornelius P. Cotter , “Eisenhower as Party Leader,” Political Science Quarterly 98 (1983): 255–83

Jo Freeman , “The Political Culture of the Democratic and Republican Parties,” Political Science Quarterly 101 (1986): 327–56

Daniel J. Galvin , “Changing Course: Reversing the Organizational Trajectory of the Democratic Party from Bill Clinton to Barack Obama,” The Forum 6 (2008).

Elaine C. Kamarck , “Assessing Howard Dean's Fifty State Strategy and the 2006 Midterm Elections,” The Forum 4 (2006)

Sidney M. Milkis and Jesse H. Rhodes , “Barack Obama, the Democratic Party, and the Future of the ‘New American Party System',” The Forum 7 (2009)

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Studies in American Political Development
  • ISSN: 0898-588X
  • EISSN: 1469-8692
  • URL: /core/journals/studies-in-american-political-development
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *