Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T01:36:49.567Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The puritan piety of members of the Long Parliament

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2016

G. S. S. Yule*
Affiliation:
Ormond College, University of Melbourne

Extract

Although most historians of the English Civil War pay lip service to Puritanism as one of its main ingredients, as a matter of fact, the analysis of religious conviction is rarely undertaken except, perhaps, in regard to the ministers. How deeply Puritanism impinged on the laity is either ignored or treated in an imprecise fashion or explained as rationalisation of deeper economic or social concerns. The Whig historians, who coined the phrase ‘Puritan Revolution’, really see Puritanism playing a general political role, leading to toleration, with the advanced exponents of liberty, like Cromwell, or as causing the opposition to clerical episcopal tyranny in the case of people like Prynne. Even so careful an historian as W. A. Shaw fails completely to understand Pym’s use of biblical imagery and, I think, basically underplays the religiosity of the Parliament men.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Ecclesiastical History Society 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page no 187 note 1 Shaw, W. A., A History of the English Church during the Civil War and under the Commonwealth (London, 1900) 1, p 50 n 1 Google Scholar. Perceptive as he is, he fails to take full account of the biblicism or piety of the members of Parliament and so tends to read back the nineteenth-century politico-religious concerns into the seventeenth century.

page no 187 note 2 B[ritish] M[useum] Add[itional] MSS 25,285.

page no 187 note 3 BM Add MSS 10, 114.

page no 188 note 1 A Pack of Puritans (London 1641) pp 2, 14, 48, 54-6. Halkett, S. and Laing, J., Dictionary of Anonymous and Pseudonymous English Literature (London 1926)Google Scholar, ascribe the authorship to Sir Peter Wentworth.

page no 188 note 2 Eight Occasional Speeches made in this Parliament by Sir John Wray (London 1641) p 12.

page no 188 note 3 Say, and Sele, , A Speech concerning Liturgy and Separation (London 1641)Google Scholar.

page no 188 note 4 In Woodhouse, A. S. P., Puritanism and Liberty (London 1938) pp 154-6Google Scholar.

page no 188 note 5 Pym’s speech against Laud in William, Prynne, Canterburies Doome (London 1646) p 30 Google Scholar.

page no 188 note 6 William, Prynne, Independency Examined (London 1644) example, p 11 Google Scholar.

page no 188 note 7 Ludlow, E., The Memoirs of Edmund Ludlow, ed Firth, C. H. (Oxford 1894) 1, p 207 Google Scholar.

page no 188 note 8 Ibid, 1, p 185.

page no 189 note 1 Nathaniel, Holmes, The New Reformed Church (London 1641) p 50 Google Scholar.

page no 189 note 2 Harbottle Grimston, Speech in Parliament, 9 Nov. 1640, in Rushworth, J., Historical Collections of Private Passages etc, 4 vols in 7 (London 1659-1701) 1, p 35 Google Scholar.

page no 189 note 3 John, Hampden, His Speech in Parliament 4 Jan, 1641 (London 1642) p 2 Google Scholar.

page no 189 note 4 William, Prynne, The substance of a speech made in the House of Commons, 4 Dec, 1648 (London 1648), Epistle to the reader, unnumbered pagination, p 8 Google Scholar.

page no 189 note 5 Questions propounded to the Assembly of Divines by the House of Commons, April ult, 1646 (London 1646) pp 5, 6.

page no 190 note 1 John, Gauden, The Love of Truth and Peace (London 1641) p 24 Google Scholar.

page no 190 note 2 John, Pym, A speech to the Lords on the delivery of articles against Laud (London 1641) p 2 Google Scholar.

page no 190 note 3 Master Maynard His Speech at the Guildhall Jan 6, 1641, p 3.

page no 190 note 4 The Unbishoping of Timothy and Titus...by a well wisher to God’s Truth (London 1636) p 155.

page no 190 note 5 [Seth], Wood, [A Saint’s Entrance into Peace and Rest by Death] (London 1651), A sermon preached at the Funeral of Sir William Armine, p 20 Google Scholar.

page no 190 note 6 [Samuel], Clarke, [Lives of Sundry Eminent Persons] (London 1683) p 173 Google Scholar.

page no 190 note 7 Ibid, p 113.

page no 191 note 1 Ibid, p 171.

page no 191 note 2 Roger Hill to his daughter Mrs Abigail Lockey, BM Add MSS 46:500, fol 48.

page no 191 note 3 [Letters of Lady Brilliana] Harley, ed Lewis, R. T., Cam. S, LVIII (1853) p 15 Google Scholar.

page no 191 note 4 Edmund Calamy, A pattern for all, Sermon at funeral of the Earl of Warwick (1658) p 34.

page no 191 note 5 Ibid, p 35.

page no 191 note 6 Thomas Froysell ‘Funeral Sermon of Sir Robert Harley’, in Harley, p xxxiii.

page no 191 note 7 Clarke, p 170.

page no 191 note 8 Ibid, p 112.

page no 192 note 1 ‘Funeral Sermon of Sir Robt, Harley’, Harley, p xxxiii.

page no 192 note 2 BM Add MSS 46;500.

page no 192 note 3 Wood, p 21.

page no 192 note 4 Life of Lady Armine, in Clarke.

page no 192 note 5 Wood, p 17.

page no 192 note 6 Stephen, Marshall, The Churches Lamentation for the Good Man his losse (London 1644) p 27 Google Scholar.

page no 192 note 7 Harley, p xxxiv.

page no 192 note 8 Wood, p 19.

page no 193 note 1 Keeler, M. F., The Long Parliament, 1640-41; A Biographical study of its Members (Philadelphia 1954)Google Scholar.

page no 193 note 2 Trevor-Roper, H. R., ‘The Fast Sermons of the Long Parliament’, in Essays in British History, ed Trevor-Roper, H. R. (London 1965)Google Scholar.

page no 193 note 3 Stephen, Marshall, Meroz Cursed (London 1641) p 25 Google Scholar. See also p 49.

page no 193 note 4 Edmund, Calamy, England’s Looking Class (London 1641) p 23 Google Scholar.

page no 193 note 5 Rushworth, iv, p 24.

page no 194 note 1 A Sermon Preached at Westminster before Sundry of the House of Commons by S. Simpson (London 1643) pp 19, 20.

page no 194 note 2 Bernt Moeller, Reichstadt und Reformation (Gütersloh 1962).

page no 194 note 3 I am indebted to the Numeld Foundation, the Ian Potter Foundation and the Australian Humanities Research Council for grants to visit England for two periods of three months in 1967-70 when most of the research on this theme in preparation for a larger work was done.