Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 15
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Kociński, Jędrzej and Niemiec, Dawid 2016. Time-compressed speech intelligibility in different reverberant conditions. Applied Acoustics, Vol. 113, p. 58.


    ORIKASA, MAMI 2016. The intelligibility of varieties of English in Japan. World Englishes,


    Turel, Vehbi and McKenna, Peter 2015. Intelligent Design of Interactive Multimedia Listening Software.


    Turel, Vehbi 2014. Human Rights and the Impact of ICT in the Public Sphere.


    Selamat, Suzanah and Sidhu, Gurnam Kaur 2013. Enhancing Listening Comprehension: The Role of Metacognitive Strategy Instruction (MetSI). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 90, p. 421.


    Hincks, Rebecca 2010. Speaking rate and information content in English lingua franca oral presentations. English for Specific Purposes, Vol. 29, Issue. 1, p. 4.


    Cutler, Anne Weber, Andrea Smits, Roel and Cooper, Nicole 2004. Patterns of English phoneme confusions by native and non-native listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 116, Issue. 6, p. 3668.


    Goh, Christine C.M 2000. A cognitive perspective on language learners' listening comprehension problems. System, Vol. 28, Issue. 1, p. 55.


    Bond, Z.S. Moore, T.J. and Gable, B. 1996. Proceeding of Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. ICSLP '96. Vol. 4, Issue. , p. 2510.

    Braidi, Susan M. 1995. Reconsidering the Role of Interaction and Input in Second Language Acquisition. Language Learning, Vol. 45, Issue. 1, p. 141.


    RUBIN, JOAN 1994. A Review of Second Language Listening Comprehension Research. The Modern Language Journal, Vol. 78, Issue. 2, p. 199.


    BACON, SUSAN M. 1992. The Relationship between Gender, Comprehension, Processing Strategies, and Cognitive and Affective Response in Foreign Language Listening. The Modern Language Journal, Vol. 76, Issue. 2, p. 160.


    MACK, MOLLY 1992. How well is computer-processed speech understood?: a cross-linguistic and cross-dialectal analysis. World Englishes, Vol. 11, Issue. 2-3, p. 285.


    SECULES, TERESA HERRON, CAROL and TOMASELLO, MICHAEL 1992. The Effect of Video Context on Foreign Language Learning. The Modern Language Journal, Vol. 76, Issue. 4, p. 480.


    Griffiths, Roger 1990. Speech Rate and NNS Comprehension: A Preliminary Study in Time-Benefit Analysis*. Language Learning, Vol. 40, Issue. 3, p. 311.


    ×

The Effects of Time-Compressed Speech on Native and Efl Listening Comprehension

  • Linda Conrad (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100007804
  • Published online: 01 November 2008
Abstract

The experiment reported here used time-compressed speech to handicap the process of listening comprehension in an attempt to observe aural processing strategy differences among groups of native English speakers and high- and medium-level skill groups learning the language. The participants were asked to immediately recall 5 time-compressed recordings each of 16 simple English sentences; the 5 replays represented decreasing rates of time-compression ranging from 40% to 90% normal playing time. Group performances were compared for the 5 rates of compression with regard to overall sentence recall as well as to the recall of specific parts of speech. Results showed both quantitative and qualitative differences among the three test groups. Overall recall of the time-compressed sentences decreased with decreasing proficiency in the language. Furthermore, whereas native listeners demonstrated a strategy of concentrating on key content words in the stimulus, both learner groups tended to recall more words they had heard in initial or final sentence position.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

D. Aaronson , N. Markowitz , & H. Shapiro (1971). Perception and immediate recall of normal and “compressed” auditory sequences. Perception and Psychophysics, 9, 338344.

M. Beatty , R. Behnke , & F. H. Goodyear (1979). Effects of speeded speech presentations on confidence-weighted and traditional comprehension scores. Communication Monographs, 46, 147153.

M. E. Call (1985). Auditory short-term memory, listening comprehension, and the input hypothesis. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 765781.

M. A. Clarke (1979). Reading in Spanish and English: Evidence from adult ESL students. Language Learning, 29, 121147.

V. J. Cook (1977). Cognitive processes in second language learning. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 15, 120.

S. P. Corder (1967). The significance of learners' errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 5, 161170.

G. A. Cziko (1980). Language competence and reading strategies: A comparison of first-and second-language oral reading errors. Language Learning, 30, 101116.

K. I. Forster (1970). Visual perception of rapidly presented word sequences of varying complexity. Perception and Psychophysics, 8, 215221.

I. Gat , & R. W. Keith (1978). An effect of linguistic experience on auditory word discrimination by native and non-native speakers of English. Audiology, 17, 339345.

L. Henrichsen (1984). Sandhi-variation: A filter of input for learners of ESL. Language Learning, 34, 103126.

R. J. Jarvella (1971). Syntactic processing of connected speech. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 409416.

B. McLaughlin , T. Rossman , & B. McLeod (1983). Second language learning: An information-processing perspective. Language Learning, 33, 135158.

B. McLeod . & B. McLaughlin (1986). Restructuring or automaticity? Reading in a second language. Language Learning, 36, 109124.

J. Mehler , J. Segui , M. Pittet , & M. Barrière (1978). Strategies for sentence perception. Journal of Psychohnguistic Research, 7, 316.

G. A. Miller (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 8197.

J. L. Mistler-Lachman (1974). Depth of comprehension and sentence memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 98106.

A. Wingfield , & K. Nolan (1980). Spontaneous segmentation in normal and in time-compressed speech. Perception and Psychophysics, 28, 97102.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Studies in Second Language Acquisition
  • ISSN: 0272-2631
  • EISSN: 1470-1545
  • URL: /core/journals/studies-in-second-language-acquisition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×