Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T19:59:54.981Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Cross-Correlation of Abell Clusters with the Lick Galaxy Counts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2017

Per B. Lilje
Affiliation:
Institute of Astronomy, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 OHA, UK
G. Efstathiou
Affiliation:
Institute of Astronomy, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 OHA, UK

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We have analysed the cross-correlations between Abell clusters and the 10′ × 10′ Lick galaxy counts. The main new features of our analysis are as follows: (a) we correct for gradients in the Lick counts that depend only on galactic latitude; (b) we check the effects of applying a filter to remove (likely artificial) gradients on scales >20°; (c) redshifts for Abell clusters are used to compute a cross-correlation function wcg(σ), where σ = vϑ/Ho is the projected separation between a cluster with recession speed v and a galaxy at angular distance ν from the cluster centre; (d) the amplitude of the spatial cross-correlation function ξcg(r) is estimated using modern determinations of the galaxy luminosity function. Our results show that the shape of ξcg is reasonably well determined on scales r ≲20h−1 Mpc. On larger scales, the results depend sensitively on the corrections for large-scale gradients in the Lick counts. The results based on wcg(σ) are well described by a power-law model ξcg(r)≃(r/8.8h−1 Mpc)−2.2, while the angular cross-correlations for Abell clusters in distance class D=5 are better described by the model ξcg(r)=(r/6h−1 Mpc)−2.3 + (r/7h−1 Mpc)−1.7. Seldner and Peebles (1977) derived a larger amplitude for ξcg because they assumed a different luminosity function. We compare these results with theoretical predictions of ξcg in the Ω=1 biased cold dark matter (CDM) model. On scales 1 h−1 Mpc ≲ r ≲ 10 h−1 Mpc, the theoretical predictions for ξcg are in surprisingly good agreement with our observational estimates. On smaller scales, the CDM model gives too high an amplitude whereas on larger scales the predicted amplitude is too low. Neither of these discrepancies is particularly serious.

Type
Appendix 1: Poster Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1988 

References

Lilje, P.B. and Efstathiou, G. 1987, MNRAS, submitted.Google Scholar
Seldner, M. and Peebles, P.J.E. 1977, Ap. J. 215, 703.Google Scholar