Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T08:19:22.765Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

X-rays from M-type Giants—Signs of Late Stellar Activity?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2016

Matthias Hünsch
Affiliation:
Institut für Theoretische Physik und Astrophysik, Univ. Kiel, 24098 Kiel, Germany
Renada Konstantinova-Antova
Affiliation:
Institute of Astronomy, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria
Jürgen H. M. M. Schmitt
Affiliation:
Hamburger Sternwarte, Univ. Hamburg, Gojenbergsweg 112, 21029 Hamburg, Germany
Klaus-Peter Schröder
Affiliation:
Astronomy Centre, CPES, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
Dimitar Kolev
Affiliation:
Institute of Astronomy, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria
Jose-Renan de Medeiros
Affiliation:
University Federal of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil
Agnes Lèbre
Affiliation:
Groupe de Recherche en Astronomie et Astrophysique du Languedoc, Université Montpellier, France
Stephane Udry
Affiliation:
Observatoire de Genève, Switzerland

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present recent X-ray and optical observations of five M-type giants which were detected as strong X-ray sources. One of these stars, HR 5512, shows short-term variations in both X-ray flux as well as in the shape of the Hα and Ca ii H+K lines, and it rotates much faster than M-type giants usually do. No indication of binarity has been found for this star. We propose that the X-ray emission of HR 5512 is related to a large degree of stellar activity. For two other stars (15 Tri, HR 7547) radial velocity observations seem to indicate spectroscopic binarity.

Type
Part 5: Stellar Magnetic Activity and Evolution
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2004 

References

Baranne, A., Mayor, M., & Poncet, J.L. 1979, Vistas in Astron., 23, 279.Google Scholar
de Medeiros, J.R. & Mayor, M. 1999, A&AS, 139, 433.Google Scholar
Eaton, J.A. 1995, AJ, 109, 1797.Google Scholar
Eker, Z. 1986, MNRAS, 221, 947.Google Scholar
Fekel, F.C. & Balachandran, S. 1993, ApJ, 403, 708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haisch, B.M., Schmitt, J.H.M.M., & Rosso, C. 1992, ApJ, 383, L15.Google Scholar
Hünsch, M., Schmitt, J.H.M.M., Schröder, K.-P., & Reimers, D. 1996, A&A, 310, 801.Google Scholar
Hünsch, M. & Schröder, K.-P. 1996, A&A, 309, L51.Google Scholar
Hünsch, M., Schmitt, J.H.M.M., Voges, W. 1998a, A&AS, 127, 251.Google Scholar
Hünsch, M., Schmitt, J.H.M.M., Schröder, K.-P., & Zickgraf, F.-J. 1998b, A&A, 330, 225.Google Scholar
Reimers, D., Hünsch, M., Schmitt, J.H.M.M., Toussaint, F. 1996, A&A, 310, 813.Google Scholar
Schröder, K.-P., Hünsch, M., & Schmitt, J.H.M.M. 1998, A&A, 335, 591.Google Scholar
Smirnov, O.M. et al. 1993, ASP Conf. Ser., 26, 344.Google Scholar