Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-5rlvm Total loading time: 0.235 Render date: 2021-10-16T00:31:57.954Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Chronicity and the General Health Questionnaire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

M. E. Goodchild
Affiliation:
National Health and Medical Research Council Social Psychiatry Research Unit, Australian National University, P.O. Box 4, Canberra City, ACT 2601, Australia
Paul Duncan-Jones*
Affiliation:
National Health and Medical Research Council Social Psychiatry Research Unit, Australian National University, P.O. Box 4, Canberra City, ACT 2601, Australia
*
Correspondence.

Summary

We propose a new scoring for Goldberg's (1972) General Health Questionnaire. We argue that the response ‘no more than usual’, to an item describing pathology, should be treated as an indicator of chronic illness rather than of good health, and we score these responses accordingly. We give evidence that this set of responses is associated with other measures of neurotic illness, and that the revised scoring provides a better prediction of caseness than the conventional scoring. The revised scoring is more strongly associated with trait neuroticism, and is more stable in repeated measurement. It is recommended in preference to the conventional scoring for most research and epidemiological purposes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Belson, W. A. (1962) Studies in Readership. London: Business Publications.Google Scholar
Belson, W. A. (1981) The Design and Understanding of Survey Questions. England: Gower.Google Scholar
Bishop, Y. M. M., Fienberg, S. E. & Holland, P. W. (1975) Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T. & Stanley, J. C. (1963) Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Chicago: Rank McNally College.Google Scholar
Chan, D. W. & Chan, T. S. C. (1983) Reliability, validity and the structure of the General Health Questionnaire in a Chinese context. Psychological Medicine, 13, 363–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan-Jones, P. (1981) The natural history of neurosis: Probability models. In: ‘What is a Case? The Problem of Definition in Psychiatric Community Surveys’, (eds. Wing, J. K., Bebbington, P. & Robins, L. N.) London: Grant McIntyre.Google Scholar
Efron, B. (1978) Regression and ANOVA with zero-one data: Measures of residual variation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 73, 113–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1964) Manual of the Eysenck Personality Inventory. London: London University Press.Google Scholar
Finlay-Jones, R. A. & Murphy, E. (1979) Severity of psychiatric disorder and the 30–item General Health Questionnaire. British Journal of Psychiatry, 134, 609–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foulds, G. A. (1976) The Hierarchical Nature of Personal Illness. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, D. (1972) The Detection of Psychiatric Illness by Questionnaire. Maudsley Monograph, No. 21. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, D. (1978) Manual of the General Health Questionnaire. Windsor: NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar
Goodman, L. A. (1965) On the statistical analysis of mobility tables. American Journal of Sociology, 70, 564–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, L. A. (1979) Multiplicative models for the analysis of occupational mobility tables and other kinds of crossclassification tables. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 804–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, W. D. (1963) Double interview. In: 'New Developments in Research. London: Market Research Society with the Oakwood Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Harding, T. W. (1976) Validating a method of psychiatric case identification in Jamaica. Bulletin of the World Health Organisation, 54, 225–31.Google ScholarPubMed
Henderson, S., Byrne, D. G. & Duncan-Jones, P. (1981) Neurosis and the Social Enviroment. Sydney: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jones, F. L. & Pittelkow, Y. E. (1983) Analysis of occupational mobility tables using GLIM. GUM Newsletter, 7, 34–6.Google Scholar
Lilienfeld, A. M. (1976) Foundations of Epidemiology. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Munoz, P. E., Vazquez, J. L., Pastrana, E., Rodriguez, F. & Oneca, C. (1978) Study of the validity of Goldberg's 60-item GHQ in its Spanish version. Social Psychiatry, 13, 99104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wing, J. K. (1976) A technique for studying psychiatric morbidity in inpatient and outpatient series and in general population samples. Psychological Medicine, 6, 665–72.Google Scholar
Wing, J. K. Cooper, J. & Sartorius, N. (1974) The Measurement and Classification of Psychiatric Symptoms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yerushalmy, J. (1947) Statistical problems in assessing methods of medical diagnosis, with special reference to X-ray techniques. Public Health Reports, 62, 1432–99.Google ScholarPubMed
Zung, W. W. K. (1965) A self-rating depression scale. Archives of General Psychiatry, 12, 6370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.
180
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Chronicity and the General Health Questionnaire
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Chronicity and the General Health Questionnaire
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Chronicity and the General Health Questionnaire
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *