Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-dc8c957cd-mn2s7 Total loading time: 0.359 Render date: 2022-01-28T06:39:52.943Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Theories of Depersonalization: A Re-appraisal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

G. Sedman*
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield; now Consultant Psychiatrist, Herrison Group, St. Ann's Hospital, Canford Cliffs, Poole, Dorset

Extract

Introduction There have been many theories put forward to explain the not uncommon symptoms of depersonalization. They were aptly summarized by Ackner (1954) in the following way. There are theories which regard depersonalization as a symptom with an organic basis; there are theories which consider it a disturbance of a particular psychological function; there are analytic theories; and finally there is a theory which would suggest that depersonalization is a form of schizophrenia. This paper is concerned with a re-appraisal of all these theories in the light of recent and current research on the subject.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1970 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackner, B. (1954). ‘Depersonalisation I. Aetiology and phenomenology: II. Clinical syndromes.’ J. ment. Sci., 100, 838–72.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. W. (1938). ‘A clinical study of states of “ecstasy” occurring in affective disorders.’ J. Neurol. Psychiat., 1, 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ardis, J. A., and McKellar, P. (1957). ‘Hypnagogic imagery and mescaline.’ J. ment. Sci., 102, 22–9.Google Scholar
Aronson, H., Waterman, C. E., and Klee, G. D. (1962). ‘Effect of lysergic acid diethylamide (L.S.D. 25) on learning and retention.’ J. clin. exp. Psychopath., 23, 1723.Google Scholar
Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., and Erbaugh, J. (1961). ‘An inventory for measuring depression.’ Arch. gen. Psychiat., 4, 561–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergum, B. O., and Klein, I. C. (1961). A Survey and Analysis of Vigilance Research. Hum RRO. Research Report’: U.S. Army Air Defense Human Research Unit, Texas.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, E. L., Clark, L. D., and West, C. D. (1959). ‘Studies of sleep deprivation—relationship to schizophrenia.’ Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 81, 348359.Google Scholar
Cappon, D., and Banks, R. (1961). ‘Orientational perception I.’ Arch. gen. Psychiat., 5, 380–92.Google Scholar
Cappon, D., and Banks, R. (1965). ‘Orientational perception II. Body perception in depersonalisation.’ Arch. gen. Psychiat., 13, 375–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawshaw, R. (1963). ‘Reactions to a disaster.’ Arch. gen. Psychiat., 9, 157–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, J. M., McCourt, W. F., Courtney, J., and Soloman, P. (1960). ‘The effects of visual stimulation on hallucinations and other mental experiences during sensory deprivation.’ Amer. J. Psychiat., 116, 889–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davison, K. (1964). ‘Episodic depersonalization: observations on seven patients.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 110, 505–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillon, D. J. (1962). ‘Estimations of bodily dimensions.’ Percept. mot. Skills, 14, 219–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, J. C. (1963). ‘Depersonalisation phenomena in a sample population of college students.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 109, 371–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, S. (1963). ‘Body image and hypnotic response.’ Int. J. clin. and exp. Hypnosis, 11, 153–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, S. (1964). and Cleveland, S. E. (1958). Body Image and Personality. Princeton: Van Nostrand Co.Google Scholar
Fisher, S., Seidner, R. (1963). ‘Body experiences of schizophrenic, neurotic and normal women.’ J. nerv. ment. Dis., 137, 252–7.Google Scholar
Galdston, I. (1947). ‘On the aetiology of depersonalization.’ J. nerv. ment. Dis., 105, 2539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gjessing, L. R., Harding, G. F. A., Jenner, F. A., and Johann Essen, N. B. (1967). ‘The EEG in three cases of periodic catatonia.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 113, 1271–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grinberg, L. (1966). ‘Obsessive mechanisms and depersonalization.’ Int. J. Psychoanal., 47, 177–83.Google Scholar
Guttman, E., and Maclay, W. S. (1936). ‘Mescalin and depersonalization.’ J. Neurol. Psychopath., 16, 193212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, M., and Roth, M. (1962). ‘Temporal lobe epilepsy and the phobic-anxiety-depersonalisation syndrome.’ Comp. Psychiat., 3, 129–51.Google Scholar
Haug, K. (1936). Die Störungen des Persönlichkeitsbewusstseins und verwandte Entfremdungserlebnisse. Stuttgart. Enke.Google Scholar
Heilbronner, K. (1900–1). ‘Über Krankheitseinsicht.’ Z. f. Psychiat., 58, quoted by Lewis, A. J. (1934).Google Scholar
Hunter, R. C. A. (1966). ‘Depersonalisation in a borderline patient.’ Int. J. Psychoanal., 47, 3241.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. H. (1884). ‘Croonian Lectures on Evolution and Dissolution of the Nervous System’, in Selected Writings of John Hughlings Jackson, ed. Taylor, J. Vol. II. London: Staples Press. 1958.Google Scholar
Janet, P. (1903). Les Obsessions et la Psychasthénie. Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
Jarvik, M. E., Abramson, H. A., and Hirsch, M. W. (1955). ‘Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD 25) IV. Effect on attention and concentration.’ J. Psychol., 39, 373–83.Google Scholar
Jarvik, M. E., Abramson, H. A., and Hirsch, M. W. (1955). ‘Comparative subjective effects of seven drugs including lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD 25).’ J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 51, 657–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaspers, K. General Psychopathology 7th ed. (Trans. Hoenig, J. and Hamilton, M. W. Manchester: University Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Kelly, D. H. W. (1965). ‘Measurement of anxiety by forearm blood flow.’ M.D. Thesis. University of London.Google Scholar
Kelly, D. H. W. (1966). ‘Measurement of anxiety by forearm blood flow.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 111, 1012–13.Google Scholar
Kelly, D. H. W., Walter, C. J. S. (1968). ‘The relationship between clinical diagnosis and anxiety, assessed by forearm blood flow and other measurements.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 114, 611–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenna, J. C. (1962). ‘Sensory deprivation phenomena: critical review and explanatory models.’ Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 55, 1004–10.Google Scholar
Klages, W. (1959). ‘Depersonalisationserscheinungen bei hirnorganisch Kranken und Schizophrenen.’ Archiv. f. Psychiatrie un. Z f d. ges. Neurologie, 119, 266–79.Google Scholar
Klein, M. (1946). ‘Notes on some schizoid mechanisms.’ Int. J. Psychoanal., 27, 99110.Google Scholar
Kornetsky, C., and Humphries, O. (1957). ‘Relationship between effects of a number of centrally acting drugs and personality.’ Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 77, 325–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishaber, , (1872). ‘De la névropathie cérébrocardiaque.’ Gaz. Sci. méd. (Bordeaux). Google Scholar
Kuramochi, H. (1961). ‘Psychopathological study of experimental psychoses induced by LSD 25. 1 Outline of LSD symptoms in normal subjects.’ Psychiat. Neurol. Jap., 63, 91105.Google Scholar
Lader, M. H., and Wing, L. (1966). Physiological Measures, Sedative Drugs and Morbid Anxiety. Maudsley Monograph No. 14. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Langfeldt, G. (1960). ‘Diagnosis and prognosis of schizophrenia.’ Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 52, 595–6.Google Scholar
Levine, J., and Ludwig, A. M. (1965). ‘Alterations in consciousness produced by combinations of LSD, hypnosis and psychotherapy.’ Psychopharmacol., 7, 123–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, A. J. (1934). ‘Melancholia: a clinical survey of depressive states.’ J. ment. Sci., 80, 277378.Google Scholar
Lewis, N. D. C. (1949). ‘Criteria for early differential diagnosis of psychoneurosis and schizophrenia.’ Amer. J. Psychother., 3, 418.Google Scholar
Lewis, N. D. C. (1965). ‘Some possible basic determinants of depersonalisation phenomena,’ in Psychopathology of Perception eds. Hoch, P. H. and Zubin, J. New York: Grune and Stratton.Google Scholar
Linton, H. B., and Langs, R. J. (1962a). ‘Subjective reactions to lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD 25). Arch. gen. Psychiat., 6, 352–68.Google Scholar
Linton, H. B., and Langs, R. J. (1962b). ‘Placebo reactions in a study of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD 25).’ Arch. gen. Psychiat., 6, 369–83.Google Scholar
Loewy, M. (1908). ‘Die Aktionsgefühle: ein Depersonalisationsfall als Beitrag zur Psychologie des Aktivitätsgefühls und des Persönlichkeitsbewusstseins.’ Prag. med. Wsch., 33, 443–61.Google Scholar
MacCurdy, J. T. (1925). The Psychology of Emotion. London.Google Scholar
McKellar, P. (1957). ‘Imagination and Thinking: A Psychological Analysis. London: Cohen and West.Google Scholar
Mapother, E. Quoted by Mayer-Gross, (1935).Google Scholar
Mayer-Gross, W. (1935). ‘On Depersonalisation.’ Brit. J. med. Psychol., 15, 103122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J. E. (1956). ‘Studien zur Depersonalisation.’ Psychiat. et Neurol. (Basel), 132, 221–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J. E. (1959). “’Dreamy states” und Depersonalisation.’ Arch. f. Psychiat., 200, 1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunberg, H. (1956). Practice and Theory of Psychoanalysis. New York: Int. Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Oesterreich (1910). Die Phenomenologie des Ich. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Pick, A. (1904). ‘Zur Pathologie des Ich-Bewusstseins. Studie aus der allgemeinen Psychopathologie.’ Arch. Psychiat., (Berlin), 38, 22–3.Google Scholar
Reed, G. F. (1962). ‘Preparatory set as a factor in the production of sensory deprivation phenomena.’ Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 55, 1010–14.Google Scholar
Reed, G. F., Sedman, G. (1964). ‘Personality and depersonalisation under sensory deprivation conditions.’ Percept. motor Skills, 18, 659–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribot, T. (1882). Diseases of Memory. London.Google Scholar
Roberts, W. W. (1960). ‘Normal and abnormal depersonalisation.’ J. ment. Sci., 106, 478–93.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, H. (1947). ‘Analysis of schizophrenic state with depersonalisation.’ Int J. Psychoanal., 28, 130–9.Google Scholar
Roth, M. (1960). ‘The phobic anxiety-depersonalisation syndrome and some general aetiological problems in psychiatry.’ J. Neuropsychiat., 1, 292306.Google Scholar
Roth, M., Harper, M. (1962). ‘Temporal lobe epilepsy and the phobic anxiety-depersonalisation syndrome II.’ Comp. Psychiat., 3, 215–26.Google Scholar
Salfield, D. J. (1958). ‘Depersonalisation and allied disturbances in childhood.’ J. ment. Sci., 104, 472–6.Google Scholar
Sarlin, C. N. (1962). ‘Depersonalisation and derealisation.’ J. Amer. Psychol. Assoc., 10, 784804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schilder, P. (1914). Selbstbewusstsein und Persönlichkeitbewusstsein. Berlin.Google Scholar
Schilder, P. (1928). Introduction to Analytical Psychiatry. New York: Nerv. Ment. Dis. Pub. Co.Google Scholar
Sedman, G., and Reed, G. F. (1963). ‘Depersonalisation phenomena in obsessional personalities and in depression.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 109, 376–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedman, G., Kenna, J. C. (1963). ‘Depersonalisation and mood changes in schizophrenia.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 109, 669673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedman, G., Kenna, J. C. (1964). ‘The occurrence of depersonalisation phenomena under L.S.D.’ Psychiat. et Neurol. (Basel), 147, 129–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedman, G., Kenna, J. C. (1965). ‘Depersonalisation in temporal lobe epilepsy and the organic psychoses.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 111, 293–9.Google Scholar
Sedman, G. (1966). ‘Depersonalisation in a group of normal subjects.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 112, 907–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedman, G. (1967). ‘Experimental and phenomenological approaches to the problem of hallucinations in organic psychosyndromes.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 113, 1115–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedman, G. (1968). ‘An investigation of states of affect and alteration in consciousness as factors concerned in the aetiology of depersonalisation.’ Ph.D. Thesis (Unpublished) University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
Shorvon, H. J. (1946). ‘The depersonalisation syndrome.’ Proc. roy. Soc. Med., 39, 779–85.Google Scholar
Shurley, J. T. (1960). ‘Profound experimental sensory isolation.’ Amer. J. Psychiat., 117, 539–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, A., and Klee, G. D. (1958). ‘A psycho-pharmacological test of the “body image in hypothesis”.’ J. nerv. ment. Dis., 127, 328–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, A., and Klee, G. D. (1959). ‘Effects of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD 25) on intellectual functions.’ Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 80, 477–80.Google Scholar
Silverstein, A., and Klee, G. D. (1960). ‘The effect of L.S.D. on digit span.’ J. clin. exp. Psychopath., 21, 1114.Google Scholar
Skoog, G. (1965). ‘Onset of anancastic conditions.’ Acta psychiat. neurol. Scand., Suppl. 184 to Vol. 14.Google Scholar
Smith, S., and Lewty, W. (1959). ‘Perceptual isolation using a silent room.’ Lancet, ii, 342–5.Google Scholar
Sours, J. A. (1965). ‘The “break-off” phenomenon.’ Arch. gen. Psychiat., 13, 447–56.Google Scholar
Stamm, J. L. (1962). ‘Altered ego states allied to depersonalisation.’ J. Amer. psychoanal. Assoc., 10, 762–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, W. A. (1964). ‘Report of a panel on depersonalisation.’ J. Amer. psychoanal. Assoc., 12, 171–86.Google Scholar
Taine, H. (1870). De l'Intelligence. Google Scholar
Vernon, J. A., and Hoffman, I. (1961). ‘Effects of sensory deprivation on learning rate in human beings.’ Science, 133, 1808–12.Google Scholar
Von Mering, O., Morimoto, K., Hyde, R. W., and Rinkelm, . (1957). ‘Experimentally induced depersonalisation.’ in Experimental Psychopathology, ed. Hoch, P. H., and Zubin, T. New York: Grune and Stratton.Google Scholar
Wilmanns, K. (1907). ‘Die Differentialdiagnostik der funktionellen Psychosen.’ Zent. f. Nervenheilk u. Psychiat., Berlin, Leipzig, 30, 569–88.Google Scholar
Ziskind, E. (1965). ‘An explanation of mental symptoms found in acute sensory deprivation.’ Amer. J, Psychiat., 121, 939–46.Google Scholar
Zubek, J. P., Sansom, W., and Prysiaznuik, A. (1960). ‘Intellectual changes during prolonged perceptual isolation (darkness and silence).’ Canad. J. Psychol., 14, 233–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.
42
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Theories of Depersonalization: A Re-appraisal
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Theories of Depersonalization: A Re-appraisal
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Theories of Depersonalization: A Re-appraisal
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *