Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Authors' reply

  • Nav Kapur (a1), Leah Quinlivan (a2), Sarah Steeg (a3), Rory O'Connor (a4), Keith Hawton (a5) and David Gunnell (a6)...
  • In response to commentaries on:
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Authors' reply
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Authors' reply
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Authors' reply
      Available formats
      ×
Abstract
Copyright
References
Hide All
1 Quinlivan, L, Cooper, J, Meehan, D, Longson, D, Potokar, J, Hulme, T, et al. Predictive accuracy of risk scales following self-harm: multicentre, prospective cohort study. Br J Psychiatry 2017; 210: 429–36.
2 Kapur, N, Cooper, J, Rodway, C, Kelly, J, Guthrie, E, Mackway-Jones, K. Predicting the risk of repetition after self harm: cohort study. BMJ 2005; 330: 394–5.
3 Chan, MKY, Bhatti, H, Meader, N, Stockton, S, Evans, J, O'Connor, RC, et al. Predicting suicide following self-harm: systematic review of risk factors and risk scales. Br J Psychiatry 2016; 209: 277–83.
4 Quinlivan, L, Cooper, J, Davies, L, Hawton, K, Gunnell, D, Kapur, N. Which are the most useful scales for predicting repeat self-harm? A systematic review evaluating risk scales using measures of diagnostic accuracy. BMJ Open 2016; 6: e009297-e.
5 Owens, D, Kelley, R. Predictive properties of risk assessment instruments following self-harm. Br J Psychiatry 2017; 210: 384–6.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The British Journal of Psychiatry
  • ISSN: 0007-1250
  • EISSN: 1472-1465
  • URL: /core/journals/the-british-journal-of-psychiatry
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 21 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 49 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 2nd January 2018 - 23rd April 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Authors' reply

  • Nav Kapur (a1), Leah Quinlivan (a2), Sarah Steeg (a3), Rory O'Connor (a4), Keith Hawton (a5) and David Gunnell (a6)...
  • In response to commentaries on:
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.

×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *