Skip to main content Accessibility help

Author's reply

  • David Aceituno (a1)
  • In response to commentaries on:


  • An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided below. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.



Hide All
1Aceituno, D, Vera, N, Prina, M, McCrone, P. Cost-effectiveness of early intervention in psychosis: systematic review. Br J Psych 2019; 215: 388–94.
2Rosenheck, R. The challenge of cost-effectiveness research on first-episode psychosis. Br J Psychiatry 2019; 215: 386–7.
3Moher, D, Liberati, A, Tetzlaff, J, Altman, DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009; 6: e1000097.
4Amos, AJ. A review of spin and bias use in the early intervention in psychosis literature. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord 2014; 16: 13r01586.
5Amos, A. Assessing the cost of early intervention in psychosis: a systematic review. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2012; 46: 719–34.
6Amos, A. Burning the straw men: intellectual integrity in the early intervention debate. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2012; 46: 812–5.
7Berger, ML, Martin, BC, Husereau, D, Worley, K, Allen, JD, Yang, W, et al. A questionnaire to assess the relevance and credibility of observational studies to inform health care decision making: an ISPOR-AMCP-NPC Good Practice Task Force report. Value Health 2014; 17: 143–56.
8Evers, S, Goossens, M, de Vet, H, van Tulder, M, Ament, A. Criteria list for assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations: consensus on health economic criteria. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2005; 21: 240–5.
9Tsiachristas, A, Thomas, T, Leal, J, Lennox, BR. Economic impact of early intervention in psychosis services: results from a longitudinal retrospective controlled study in England. BMJ Open 2016; 6: e012611.
10Freemantle, N, Marston, L, Walters, K, Wood, J, Reynolds, MR, Petersen, I. Making inferences on treatment effects from real world data: propensity scores, confounding by indication and other perils for the unwary in observational research. BMJ 2013; 347: f6409.
11Briggs, AH, O'Brien, BJ. The death of cost-minimization analysis? Health Econ 2001; 10: 179–84.
12Drummond, MF, Sculpher, MJ, Claxton, K, Stoddart, GL, Torrance, GW. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes (4th edn). Oxford University Press, 2015.
13Neumann, PJ, Sanders, GD, Russell, LB, Siegel, JE, Ganiats, TG. Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. Oxford University Press, 2016.
14Fusar-Poli, P, McGorry, PD, Kane, JM. Improving outcomes of first-episode psychosis: an overview. World Psychiatry 2017; 16: 251–65.
15Lieb, K, von der Osten-Sacken, J, Stoffers-Winterling, J, Reiss, N, Barth, J. Conflicts of interest and spin in reviews of psychological therapies: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2016; 6: e010606.

Author's reply

  • David Aceituno (a1)
  • In response to commentaries on:


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed

Author's reply

  • David Aceituno (a1)
  • In response to commentaries on:
Submit a response


No eLetters have been published for this article.


Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *