Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-ffbbcc459-slw7l Total loading time: 0.388 Render date: 2022-03-14T18:58:26.313Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }
  • English
The British Journal of Psychiatry The British Journal of Psychiatry

Article contents

Impact of the physical environment of psychiatric wards on the use of seclusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

P. S. van der Schaaf ,
E. Dusseldorp ,
F. M. Keuning ,
W. A. Janssen  and
E. O. Noorthoorn
P. S. van der Schaaf*
Affiliation:
TNO Behavioural and Societal Sciences, Soesterberg, The Netherlands
E. Dusseldorp
Affiliation:
TNO Behavioural and Societal Sciences, Soesterberg, The Netherlands
F. M. Keuning
Affiliation:
TNO Behavioural and Societal Sciences, Soesterberg, The Netherlands
W. A. Janssen
Affiliation:
Kenniscentrum GGNet, Warnsveld, The Netherlands
E. O. Noorthoorn
Affiliation:
Kenniscentrum GGNet, Warnsveld, The Netherlands
*
P. S. van der Schaaf, TNO, Dutch Centre for Health Assets/DuCHA Kampweg 5, 3769 DE Soesterberg, The Netherlands. Email: psvdschaaf@hotmail.com
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

HTML view is not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background

The physical environment is presumed to have an effect on aggression and also on the use of seclusion on psychiatric wards. Multicentre studies that include a broad variety of design features found on psychiatric wards and that control for patient, staff and general ward characteristics are scarce.

Aims

To explore the effect of design features on the risk of being secluded, the number of seclusion incidents and the time in seclusion, for patients admitted to locked wards for intensive psychiatric care.

Method

Data on the building quality and safety of psychiatric as well as forensic wards (n = 199) were combined with data on the frequency and type of coercive measures per admission (n = 23 868 admissions of n = 14 834 patients) on these wards, over a 12-month period. We used non-linear principal components analysis (CATPCA) to reduce the observed design features into a smaller number of uncorrelated principal components. Two-level multilevel (logistic) regression analyses were used to explore the relationship with seclusion. Admission was the first level in the analyses and ward was the second level.

Results

Overall, 14 design features had a significant effect on the risk of being secluded during admission. The ‘presence of an outdoor space’, 'special safety measures' and a large ‘number of patients in the building’ increased the risk of being secluded. Design features such as more ‘total private space per patient’, a higher ‘level of comfort’ and greater ‘visibility on the ward’, decreased the risk of being secluded.

Conclusions

A number of design features had an effect on the use of seclusion and restraint. The study highlighted the need for a greater focus on the impact of the physical environment on patients, as, along with other interventions, this can reduce the need for seclusion and restraint.

Type
Papers
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 202 , Issue 2 , February 2013 , pp. 142 - 149
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2013 

Footnotes

Declaration of interest

None.

References

1 Mason, T. Alty, A. Seclusion and Mental Health: A Break with the Past Chapman & Hall, 1994.Google Scholar
2 Currier, GW. The controversy over 'chemical restraint' in acute care psychiatry. J Psychiatr Prac 2003; 9: 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Sailas, E, Fenton, M. Seclusion and Restraint for People with Serious Mental Illnesses (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library, 2003.Google Scholar
4 Olofsson, B, Norberg, A. Experiences of coercion in psychiatric care as narrated by patients, nurses and physicians. J Adv Nurs 2001; 33: 89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Inspectie voor de Gezondheidszorg. Terugdringen Separeren Stagneert, Normen Vereist Rondom insluiting Psychiatrische Patiënten [Reduction of Seclusion in Stagnating, Standards are Required for the Seclusion of Psychiatric Patients]. Inspectie voor de Gezondheidszorg, 2011.Google Scholar
6 Nijman, HLI, Allertz, W, Merckelbach, HLGJ, à Campo, JLMG, Ravelli, DP. Aggressive behaviour on an acute psychiatric admissions ward. Eur J Psychiat 1997; 11: 106–14.Google Scholar
7 Bowers, L, Allan, T, Simpson, A, Jones, J, Van Der Merwe, M, Jeffery, D. Identifying key factors associated with aggression on acute inpatient psychiatric wards, issues Ment Health Nurs 2009; 30: 260–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8 Bower, FL, McCullough, CS, Timmons, ME. A synthesis of what we know about the use of physical restraint and seclusion with patients in psychiatric and acute care settings. Online J Knowl Synth Nurs 2003; 10: 1.Google ScholarPubMed
9 Wynn, R. Medicate, restrain or seclude? Strategies for dealing with violent and threatening behaviour in a Norwegian university psychiatric hospital. Scand J Caring Sci 2002; 16: 287–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10 Taylor, TL, Killaspy, H, Wright, C, Turton, P, White, S, Kallert, TW, et al A systematic review of the international published literature relating to quality of institutional care for people with longer term mental health problems. BMC Psychiatry 2009; 9: 55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11 Vaaler, AE, Morken, G, Linaker, OM. Effects of different interior decorations in the seclusion area of a psychiatric acute ward. Nord J Psychiatry 2005; 59: 19–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12 Wilson, MR. Soth, N, Robak, R. Managing disturbed behavior by architectural changes; making space fit the program. Milieu Ther 1983; 2:15–24.Google Scholar
13 Dijkstra, K, Pieterse, ME, Pruyn, A. Physical environmental stimuli that turn healthcare facilities into healing environments through psychologically mediated effects, systematic review. J Adv Nurs 2006; 56: 166–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14 Gross, R, Sasson, Y, Zarhy, M, Zohar, J. Healing environment in psychiatric hospital design. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 1998; 20: 108–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15 Ulrich, R. Quan, X, Zimring, C, Joseph, A, Choudhary, R. The Role of the Physical Environment in the Hospital of the 21st Century: A Once-in-a-Lifetime Opportunity. Center for Health Systems and Design, Texas A&M University, 2004.Google Scholar
16 Steinert, T, Lepping, P, Bernhardsgrütter, R, Conca, A, Hatling, T, Janssen, W, et al Incidence of seclusion and restraint in psychiatric hospitals: a literature review and survey of international trends. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2009; 46: 889–97.Google Scholar
17 Soorgaard, KW. Patients' perceptions of coercion in acute psychiatric wards: an intervention study. Nord J Psychiatry 2004; 58: 4–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18 Moran, A, Cocoman, A, Scott, P, Matthews, A, Staniuliene, V, Valimaki, M. Restraint and seclusion: a distressing treatment option? J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2009; 16: 599–605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19 Janssen, WA, Sande van de, R, Noorthoorn, EO, Nijman, HLI, Bowers, L, Mulder, CL, et al Methodological issues in monitoring the use of coercive measures. Int J Law Psychiatry 2011; 34: 429–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20 Janssen, WA, Noorthoorn, EO, Nijman, HLI. Bowers, L, Hoogendoorn, AW, Smit, A, et al Differences in seclusion rates between admission wards: does patient compilation explain? Psychiatr Q 2012; May 12 (Epub ahead of print).Google Scholar
21 van der Aalst, H, Keuning, F, Maas-Calon, M, Mimpen, L. Gesloten Huisvesting in de Geestelijke Gezondheidszorg [Quality and Safety of Buildings for Psychiatric Care]. TNO, 2010.Google Scholar
22 Janssen, WA, Noorthoorn, EO, de Vries, WJ, Hutschemeakers, GJ, Lendemeijer, HH, Widdershoven, GA. The use of seclusion in the Netherlands compared to countries in and outside Europe, int J Law Psychiatry 2008; 31: 463–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23 world Health Organization. The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines. WHO, 1992.Google Scholar
24 startup, M, Jackson, M, Bendix, S. The concurrent validity of the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF). Br J Clin Psychol 2002; 41: 417–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25 Ulrich, RS, Zimring, C, Zhu, X, DuBose, J, Seo, H. Choi, Y, et al A review of the research literature on evidence-based healthcare design. HERD 2008; 1: 102–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26 Gifford, R. Environmental Psychology. Principles and Practice (4th edn). optimal Books, 2007.Google Scholar
27 Linting, M, Meulman, J, Groenen, P, van der Kooij, A. Nonlinear principal components analysis: introduction and application. Psychol Methods 2007; 12: 336–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28 Ulrich, RS, Simon, RF, Losito, BD, Fiorito, E, Miles, MA, Zelson, M. Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. J Environ Psychol 1991; 11: 201–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29 Dijkstra, K, Pieterse, ME, Pruyn, A. Stress-reducing effects of indoor plants in built healthcare environment. The mediating role of perceived attractiveness. Prev Med 2008; 47: 279–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30 Zeisel, J, Silverstein, NM, Hyde, J, Levkoff, S, Powell Lawton, M, Holmes, W. Environmental correlates to behavioral health outcomes in Alzheimer's special care units. Gerontologist 2003; 43: 697–711.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31 Bowie, P, Mountain, G, The relationship between patient behaviour and the environmental quality for the dementing. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 1997; 12: 718–23.3.0.CO;2-3>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32 Middelboe, T, Schjødt, T, Byrsting, K, Gjerris, A. Ward atmosphere in acute psychiatric in-patient care: patients' perceptions, ideals and satisfaction. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2001; 103: 212–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33 Evans, GW. The build Environment and Mental Health. J Urban Health 2003; 80: 536–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34 Karlin, BE, Zeiss, RA. Environmental and therapeutic issues in psychiatric hospital design: toward best practices. Psychiatr Senv 2006; 57: 1376–8.Google ScholarPubMed
35 Evans, GW, Mitchell McCoy, J. When buildings don't work: the role of architecture in human health. J Environ Psychol 1998; 18: 85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36 Bowers, L, van der Werf, B, Vokkolainen, A, Muir-Cochrane, E, Allan, T, Alexander, J. international variation in attitudes to coercive measures for disturbed psychiatric inpatients. Int J Nurs Stud 2007; 44: 357–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37 Douglas, CH, Douglas, MR. Patient-centred improvements in healthcare built environments: perspectives and design indicators. Health Expect 2005; 8: 264–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38 Gaskin, CJ, Elsom, SJ, Happen, B. Interventions for reducing the use of seclusion in psychiatric facilities. Review of the literature. Br J Psychiatry 2007; 191: 298–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: PDF

van der Schaaf et al. supplementary material

Appendix 1

Download van der Schaaf et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 37 KB
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.
You have Access
58
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Impact of the physical environment of psychiatric wards on the use of seclusion
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Impact of the physical environment of psychiatric wards on the use of seclusion
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Impact of the physical environment of psychiatric wards on the use of seclusion
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *