Skip to main content
×
×
Home

International and indigenous diagnoses of mental disorder among Vietnamese living in Vietnam and Australia

  • Zachary Steel (a1), Derrick Silove (a1), Nguyen Mong Giao (a2), Thuy Thi Bich Phan (a1), Tien Chey (a1), Anna Whelan (a3), Adrian Bauman (a4) and Richard A. Bryant (a5)...
Abstract
Background

Whether the prevalence rates of common mental disorders can be compared across countries depends on the cultural validity of the diagnostic measures used.

Aims

To investigate the prevalence of Western and indigenously defined mental disorders among Vietnamese living in Vietnam and in Australia, comparing the data with an Australian-born sample.

Method

Comparative analysis of three multistage population surveys, including samples drawn from a community living in the Mekong Delta region of Vietnam (n=3039), Vietnamese immigrants residing in New South Wales, Australia (n=1161), and an Australian-born population (n=7961). Western-defined mental disorders were assessed by the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) 2.0 and included DSM–IV anxiety, mood and substance use disorders as well as the ICD–10 category of neurasthenia. The Vietnamese surveys also applied the indigenously based Phan Vietnamese Psychiatric Scale (PVPS). Functional impairment and service use were assessed.

Results

The prevalence of CIDI mental disorders for Mekong Delta Vietnamese was 1.8% compared with 6.1% for Australian Vietnamese and 16.7% for Australians. Inclusion of PVPS mental disorders increased the prevalence rates to 8.8% for Mekong Delta Vietnamese and 11.7% for Australian Vietnamese. Concordance was moderate to good between the CIDI and the PVPS for Australian Vietnamese (area under the curve (AUC)=0.77) but low for Mekong Vietnamese (AUC=0.59). PVPS- and CIDI-defined mental disorders were associated with similar levels of functional impairment.

Conclusions

Cultural factors in the expression of mental distress may influence the prevalence rates of mental disorders reported across countries. The findings have implications for assessing mental health needs at an international level.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      International and indigenous diagnoses of mental disorder among Vietnamese living in Vietnam and Australia
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      International and indigenous diagnoses of mental disorder among Vietnamese living in Vietnam and Australia
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      International and indigenous diagnoses of mental disorder among Vietnamese living in Vietnam and Australia
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
Correspondence: Zachary Steel, Centre for Population Mental Health Research, Level 1, Mental Health Centre, The Liverpool Hospital, Cnr Forbes and Campbell Streets, Liverpool NSW 2170, Australia. Email: z.steel@unsw.edu.au
Footnotes
Hide All

This research was supported in part by an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Program Grant (300304).

Declaration of interest

None.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
1 Demyttenaere, K, Bruffaerts, R, Posada-Villa, J, Gasquet, I, Kovess, V, Lepine, JP, et al. Prevalence, severity, and unmet need for treatment of mental disorders in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys. JAMA 2004; 291: 2581–90.
2 WHO International Consortium in Psychiatric Epidemiology. Cross-national comparisons of the prevalences and correlates of mental disorders. Bull World Health Organ 2000; 78: 413–26.
3 Hwu, HG, Yeh, EK, Chang, LY. Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in Taiwan defined by the Chinese Diagnostic Interview Schedule. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1989; 79: 136–47.
4 Lee, CK, Kwak, YS, Yamamoto, J, Rhee, H, Kim, YS, Han, JH, et al. Psychiatric epidemiology in Korea. Part I: Gender and age differences in Seoul. J Nerv Ment Dis 1990; 178: 242–6.
5 Shen, YC, Zhang, MY, Huang, YQ, He, YL, Liu, ZR, Cheng, H, et al. Twelve-month prevalence, severity, and unmet need for treatment of mental disorders in metropolitan China. Psychol Med 2006; 36: 257–67.
6 Steel, Z, Silove, D, Chey, T, Bauman, A, Phan, T, Phan, T. Mental disorders, disability and health service use amongst Vietnamese refugees and the host Australian population. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2005; 111: 300–9.
7 Australian Bureau of Statistics. National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing. Profile of Adults, Australia. Australian Bureau of Statistics, 1998.
8 Andrews, G, Peters, L. The psychometric properties of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1998; 33: 80–8.
9 World Health Organization. The ICD–10 Classification of Mental and Behavioral Disorders. WHO, 1992.
10 Phan, T, Steel, Z, Silove, DM. An ethnographically derived measure of anxiety, depression and somatization: the Phan Vietnamese Psychiatric Scale. Transcult Psychiatry 2004; 41: 200–32.
11 Bracken, BA, Barona, A. State of the art procedures for translating, validating and using psychoeducational tests in cross-cultural assessment. Sch Psychol Int 1991; 12: 119–32.
12 Kessler, RC, Abelson, J, Demler, O, Escobar, JI, Gibbon, M, Guyer, ME, et al. Clinical calibration of DSM–IV diagnoses in the World Mental Health (WMH) version of the World Health Organization (WHO) Composite International Diagnostic Interview (WMHCIDI). Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2004; 13: 122–39.
13 Haro, JM, Arbabzadeh-Bouchez, S, Brugha, TS, de Girolamo, G, Guyer, ME, Jin, R, et al. Concordance of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview Version 3.0 (CIDI 3.0) with standardized clinical assessments in the WHO World Mental Health surveys. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2006; 15: 167–80.
14 Landis, JR, Koch, GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33:159–74.
15 Kawakami, N, Shimizu, H, Haratani, T, Iwata, N, Kitamura, T. Lifetime and 6-month prevalence of DSM–III–R psychiatric disorders in an urban community in Japan. Psychiatr Res 2004; 121: 293301.
16 Lee, S, Tsang, A, Zhang, M-Y, Huang, Y-Q, He, Y-L, Liu, Z-R, et al. Lifetime prevalence and inter-cohort variation in DSM–IV disorders in metropolitan China. Psychol Med 2007; 37: 6171.
17 Compton, WM 3rd, Helzer, JE, Hwu, HG, Yeh, EK, McEvoy, L, Tipp, JE, et al. New methods in cross-cultural psychiatry: psychiatric illness in Taiwan and the United States. Am J Psychiatry 1991; 148: 1697–704.
18 Parker, G, Chan, B, Hadzi-Pavlovic, D. Lower rates of depression in westernised Chinese in the US. J Affect Disord 2007; 104: 175–8.
19 Ryder, AG, Yang, J, Zhu, X, Yao, S, Yi, J, Heine, SJ, et al. The cultural shaping of depression: somatic symptoms in China, psychological symptoms in North America? J Abnorm Psychol 2008; 117: 300–13.
20 Lin, EH, Ihle, LJ, Tazuma, L. Depression among Vietnamese refugees in a primary care clinic. Am J Med 1985; 78: 41–4.
21 Paralikar, V, Sarmukaddam, S, Agashe, M, Weiss, MG. Diagnostic concordance of neurasthenia spectrum disorders in Pune, India. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2007; 42: 561–72.
22 Lee, S. From diversity to unity. The classification of mental disorders in 21st-century China. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2001; 24: 421–31.
23 Beiser, M, Fleming, JA. Measuring psychiatric disorder among Southeast Asian refugees. Psychol Med 1986; 16: 627–39.
24 Simon, GE, Goldberg, DP, Von Korff, M, Ustun, TB. Understanding cross-national differences in depression prevalence. Psychol Med 2002; 32: 585–94.
25 Wang, PS, Aguilar-Gaxiola, S, Alonso, J, Angermeyer, MC, Borges, G, Bromet, EJ, et al. Use of mental health services for anxiety, mood, and substance disorders in 17 countries in the WHO world mental health surveys. Lancet 2007; 370: 841–50.
26 Kessler, RC, Chiu, WT, Demler, O, Merikangas, KR, Walters, EE, Merikangas, KR. Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM–IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005; 62: 617–27.
27 Kessler, RC, Wittchen, HU, Abelson, JM, McGonagle, KA, Schwartz, N, Kendler, KS, et al. Methodological studies of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) in the US National Comorbidity Survey (NCS). Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 1998; 7: 3355.
28 Van Ommeren, M. Validity issues in transcultural epidemiology. Br J Psychiatry 2003; 182: 376–8.
29 Beiser, M, Hou, F. Language acquisition, unemployment and depressive disorder among Southeast Asian refugees: a 10 year study. Soc Sci Med 2001; 53: 1321–34.
30 Hinton, WL, Chen, YC, Du, N, Tran, CG, Lu, FG, Miranda, J, et al. DSM–III–R disorders in Vietnamese refugees. Prevalence and correlates. J Nerv Ment Dis 1993; 181: 113–22.
31 Kirmayer, LJ. Beyond the ‘new cross-cultural psychiatry’: cultural biology, discursive psychology and the ironies of globalization. Transcult Psychiatry 2006; 43: 126–44.
32 Patel, V. Cultural factors and international epidemiology. Br Med Bull 2001; 57: 3345.
33 Saxena, S, Thornicroft, G, Knapp, M, Whiteford, H. Resources for mental health: scarcity, inequity, and inefficiency. Lancet 2007; 370: 878–89.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The British Journal of Psychiatry
  • ISSN: 0007-1250
  • EISSN: 1472-1465
  • URL: /core/journals/the-british-journal-of-psychiatry
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed

International and indigenous diagnoses of mental disorder among Vietnamese living in Vietnam and Australia

  • Zachary Steel (a1), Derrick Silove (a1), Nguyen Mong Giao (a2), Thuy Thi Bich Phan (a1), Tien Chey (a1), Anna Whelan (a3), Adrian Bauman (a4) and Richard A. Bryant (a5)...
Submit a response

eLetters

Culturally valid assessment and psychiatric epidemiology

Zachary Steel, Senior Lecturer
26 May 2009

In summary, our report identified lower diagnostic concordance between the CIDI 2.0 and the indigenously derived Phan Vietnamese Psychiatric Rating Scale (PVPS) amongst Vietnamese in the Mekong Delta region compared to Vietnamese in Australia. Whereas rates of mental disorder identified by the PVPS were stable across countries, CIDI identified mental disorder was three times lower in the Mekong Delta. Of particular importance was that the CIDI failed to detect 75% of equally disabled PVPS cases in Vietnam.

Sing Lee and colleagues raise important questions that need to be resolved in order to make sense of the findings of international psychiatric epidemiology. We address some of their concerns in relation to our method. Although technically the PVPS is a questionnaire, it was administered in interview format as is common in the transcultural setting. Moreover, there is some evidence that amongst Vietnamese, there is a tendency to use a restricted range in reporting symptom severity on questionnaires [1], a factor that would yield conservative rates . Dr Lee and colleagues suggest that the skip rules of the CIDI may lower prevalence rates. We concur that the pre-eminence given to psychological rather than somatic stem symptoms in the hierarchical structure of the CIDI [2] might limit positive endorsements in non-western countries. However, if this effect was present it differentially impacted on the Mekong Delta sample, underscoring the importance of culture and ‘westernization’ as a influence on psychiatric assessment. We look forwardto the publication of the results from the Chinese trials of the CIDI 3.1 which have re-formulated the stem questions to be more compatible with somatic idioms of distress.

We do note however, that removing PVPS cases that only reached threshold on the somatisation scale would have reduced our prevalence rates by 2.8% in Vietnam and 3.0% in Australia. Hence, the PVPS would still have identified a substantial number of cases not yielded by the CIDI. We note too that the western derived measure of neurasthenia recorded low rates in all samples suggesting that somatic measures need tobe culture-specific.

In summary, there does not seem to be any major disagreement here. Whether we produce indigenous measures ab initio, as we have done, or modify existing measures as undertaken by Sing Lee and colleagues with theCIDI 3.1, the inference we draw remains the same: in order to detect the full range of disabling mental disorders across cultures, we need to have culturally appropriate measurement. We can’t simply apply the same measure with the same wording of items in the same format to all cultures and expect that we can compare the results. The cost of applying either adapted or culturally-developed measures, however, is that it confounds the process of making direct international comparisons of prevalence ratesand mental health need. Hence, the real challenge facing world psychiatry is how to combine the strengths of psychiatric epidemiology [3] with improvements in culturally valid assessment [4, 5]. Showing consistent patterns of comorbidity and risk factor profiles across countries can onlypartially address this issue. Zachary Steel, Derrick SiloveDeclaration of interest: none

1.Beiser M, Fleming JA. Measuring psychiatric disorder among Southeast Asian refugees. Psychological Medicine. 1986;16(3):627-639.

2.Shen YC, Zhang MY, Huang YQ, He YL, Liu ZR, Cheng H, Tsang A, Lee S, Kessler RC. Twelve-month prevalence, severity, and unmet need for treatment of mental disorders in metropolitan China. Psychological Medicine. Feb 2006;36(2):257-267.

3.Kessler RC, Angermeyer M, Anthony JC, de Graaf R, Demyttenaere K, Gasquet I, de Girolamo G, Gluzman S, Gureje O, Haro JM, Kawakami N, Karam A, Levinson D, Mora MEM, Browne MAO, Posada-Villa J, Stein DJ, Tsang CHA, Aguilar-Gaxiola S, Alonso J, Lee S, Heeringa S, Pennell BE, Berglund P, Gruber MJ, Petkhova M, Chatterji S, Ustun TB. Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of mental disorders in the World Health Organization's World Mental Health Survey Initiative. World Psychiatry. Oct 2007;6(3):168-176.

4.Silove D, Bateman C, Brooks R, Zulmira FCA, Steel Z, Rodger J, Soosay I, Fox G, Patel V, A B. Estimating clinically relevant mental disorders in a rural and urban setting in post-conflict Timor Lest. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2008;65(10):1205-1212.

5.Patel V, Simbine AP, Soares IC, Weiss HA, Wheeler E, Patel V, Simbine APF, Soares IC, Weiss HA, Wheeler E. Prevalence of severe mental and neurological disorders in Mozambique: a population-based survey. Lancet. Sep 22 2007;370(9592):1055-1060.
... More

Conflict of interest: None Declared

Write a reply

The CIDI in developing countries

Sing Lee, Reader
17 April 2009

Steel and coworkers (Journal, 2009, 194, 326-333) should be commendedfor using an innovative design to show that the CIDI 2.0 missed a large proportion of diagnoses that could instead be captured by an indigenously based Phan Vietnamese Psychiatric Scale (PVPS) among Vietnamese. Interpretations of the study should also consider the following.

1. Comparison between the self-report PVPS and CIDI included two other methodological issues that have little to do with whether the PVPS was indigenously devised. First, face-to-face structured interviews have long been shown to bias against Asians in the elicitation of psychiatric symptoms. By contrast, Asians typically scored comparably high as Westerners on many self-report scales such as the GHQ (1). Second, unlike the 53-item PVPS, the CIDI contains multiple skip-outs from furthersymptom questioning unless mandatory DSM-IV core symptoms are endorsed. This renders the hierarchically configured CIDI much more prone to false negatives (2).

2. The majority of diagnoses captured by the PVPS (72%) were in the somatization category but somatoform disorders were not assessed in the CIDI (because of difficulty in operationalizing the concept of ¡§medicallyunexplained symptoms¡¨). Recent versions of the CIDI (3.0 and 3.1) containa section on chronic pains and other physical illnesses, which have been shown to be common and highly comorbid with mental disorders in both developed and developing countries (3).

3. The CIDI surely requires improvement regarding downward bias in prevalence estimates in Asian countries. China has used several versions of it (1.0 to 3.1). By adhering strictly to linguistic accuracy, the earlier versions generated unbelievably low prevalence of depression. Prevalence estimates continue to rise with successive versions and the latest survey using CIDI 3.1, by taking careful account of contextual equivalence of stem questions, interviewer training and quality control inthe field, has found a prevalence of depression little different from those of many Western countries. The Chinese CIDI has also provided highly consistent epidemiological data regarding specific disorder distributions,lifetime rates, psychosocial associations, physical/mental comorbidity, treatment-seeking and the opportunity for large-sample cross-national analysis (4). Enhancement of the CIDI may be both challenging and worth re-considering in Vietnam.

1. Cheung FM. Psychological symptoms among Chinese in urban Hong Kong. Soc Sci Med 1982; 16:1339-44.

2. Lam CY, Pepper CM, Ryabchenko KA. Case identification of mood disorders in Asian American and Caucasian American college students. Psy Quarter 2004; 75:361-73.

3. Scott KM, Von Korff M, Alonso J, Angermeyer MC, Bromet E, Fayyard J, et al. Mental-physical co-morbidity and its relationship with disability: results from the World Mental Health Surveys. Psychol Med 2009; 39:33-43.

4. Lee S, Tsang A, Von Korff M, de Graaf R, Benjet C, Haro JM, et al.Association of headache with childhood adversity and mental disorder: cross-national study. Br J Psych 2009; 194:111-6.
... More

Conflict of interest: None Declared

Write a reply

×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *