Hostname: page-component-66d9dcfd78-jd69p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-08-08T00:39:59.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Public recognition of mental disorders and beliefs abouttreatment: changes in Australia over 16 years

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Nicola J. Reavley*
Affiliation:
Orygen Youth Health Research Centre, Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
Anthony F. Jorm
Affiliation:
Orygen Youth Health Research Centre, Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
*
Nicola J. Reavley, Orygen Youth Health Research Centre,Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Locked Bag 10,Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia. Email: nreavley@unimelb.edu.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

A 1995 Australian national survey of mental health literacy showed poor recognition of disorders and beliefs about treatment that differed from those of health professionals. A similar survey carried out in 2003/4 showed some improvements over 8 years.

Aims

To investigate whether recognition of mental disorders and beliefs about treatment have changed over a 16-year period.

Method

A national survey of 6019 adults was carried out in 2011 using the same questions as the 1995 and 2003/4 surveys.

Results

Results showed improved recognition of depression and more positive ratings for a range of interventions, including help from mental health professionals and antidepressants.

Conclusions

Although beliefs about effective medications and interventions have moved closer to those of health professionals since the previous surveys, there is still potential for mental health literacy gains in the areas of recognition and treatment beliefs for mental disorders. This is particularly the case for schizophrenia.

Information

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2012 
Figure 0

TABLE 1 Percentage of respondents mentioning each category to describe the problem shown in the vignette

Figure 1

TABLE 2 Percentage of respondents naming specific types of help as being best for the person described in the vignette

Figure 2

TABLE 3 Percentage of respondents rating each intervention as ‘helpful’ for the person described in the vignette

Figure 3

TABLE 4 Percentage of respondents rating each intervention as ‘harmful’ for the person described in the vignette

Figure 4

TABLE 5 Percentage of respondents giving each outcome as ‘likely’ according to whether the person described in the vignette had appropriate professional help

This journal is not currently accepting new eletters.

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.