Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Questioning the ‘neuroprotective’ hypothesis: does drug treatment prevent brain damage in early psychosis or schizophrenia?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Joanna Moncrieff
Affiliation:
Department of Mental Health Sciences, University College London, 67–73 Riding House Street, London W1W 7EJ, UK. Email: j.moncrieff@ucl.ac.uk
Corresponding
E-mail address:
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Summary

The idea that psychotic disorders are characterised by progressive neurodegeneration that can be reversed by drug treatment is used to justify early treatment of increasing numbers of mostly young people. I argue that there is little evidence to support the view that old- or new-generation antipsychotics are ‘neuroprotective’, and some evidence that the drugs themselves may be responsible for the decline in brain matter observed in some studies.

Type
Editorials
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2011 

Joanna Moncrieff (pictured) is a senior lecturer at University College London and a consultant psychiatrist at the North East London Foundation Trust.

Almost 7 million prescriptions for antipsychotic drugs were issued outside hospital in England in 2008, an increase of 48% since 1998. 1 Data from the USA also indicate dramatically increased rates of prescription of antipsychotics to young people over recent years. Reference Olfson, Blanco, Liu, Moreno and Laje2 Ideas about the benefits of early drug treatment in psychosis, along with other factors such as the marketing of bipolar disorder, Reference Healy3 are likely to have contributed to the increasing prescription of these drugs.

The importance of starting drug treatment early, and of continuing treatment in people who would like to stop, is often justified by the prevalent belief that schizophrenia or psychosis involves a progressive loss of brain tissue that can be arrested or reduced by treatment with antipsychotic drugs. Reference Lieberman4 Accordingly, the drugs are sometimes referred to as having ‘neuroprotecive’ properties. This belief is founded on a variety of evidence, all of which is debatable and open to other interpretations.

Brain imaging research

The main area believed to support the ‘neuroprotection’ hypothesis is brain imaging research illustrating that people with schizophrenia or psychosis show a progressive reduction in brain volume and an enlargement of ventricles and cerebral spinal fluid. All such studies, however, involve people who have taken long-term antipsychotic medication. A large study showing greater decline in brain volume in patients with first-episode psychosis taking haloperidol compared with olanzapine has been interpreted as indicating the neuroprotective effects of olanzapine. Reference Lieberman, Tollefson, Charles, Zipursky, Sharma and Kahn5 The authors acknowledged, however, that the study might also be interpreted as demonstrating differential drug-induced changes. Supporting the latter interpretation, a study of macaque monkeys treated with therapeutic doses of olanzapine and haloperidol for 18 months found an 8% reduction in mean fresh brain weight in monkeys treated with haloperidol and 11% in those on olanzapine compared with non-drug-treated controls. Reference Dorph-Petersen, Pierri, Perel, Sun, Sampson and Lewis6

The great majority of studies of individuals who are drug-naive or have received only minimal treatment, do not show the global deficit in brain volume commonly associated with patients who have received drug treatment, including, most importantly, the only three studies involving people with long-term conditions who had not been exposed to drug treatment. Reference Moncrieff and Leo7 Results from two studies of people considered to be at high risk of psychosis are also believed to demonstrate progressive brain tissue loss prior to and in the early stages of psychotic illness. Many of the Australian cohort, however, were taking antipsychotic medication during some of the follow-up period. Reference Takahashi, Wood, Yung, Soulsby, McGorry and Suzuki8 In the Edinburgh study, high-risk individuals who progressed to psychosis showed greater temporal lobe reduction than those who did not progress, but did not differ from controls. Reference Lawrie, Whalley, Abukmeil, Kestelman, Miller and Best9 Overall, therefore, imaging studies provide little evidence of progressive brain tissue loss in non-drug-treated patients with schizophrenia. Moreover, the effects of drug treatment have not been excluded as a cause of the tissue loss seen in some studies of drug-treated patients. Reference Moncrieff and Leo7

Neuropathological findings

Post-mortem studies have generally not found the large-scale neuronal loss and gliosis characteristic of neurodegenerative disorders in the brains of people with schizophrenia, although there is some evidence of local reduction of neuronal sub-populations and local loss of dendritic spines and length. Reference Jarskog, Miyamoto and Lieberman10 Again, however, all studies have involved people on long-term medication. Some studies with drug-naive patients have found reduced serum levels of brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), Reference Chen, Wang, Wang, Yang, Zhang and Zheng11 but this finding is not specific to schizophrenia, and BDNF has also been found to be involved in mood disorders and the stress response. Although schizophrenia has been suggested to involve increased or abnormal apoptosis, several studies confirm that markers of apoptosis in neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's disease are not raised in post-mortem tissue from patients with chronic schizophrenia, and the role of apoptosis earlier on in the condition remains speculative. Reference Jarskog, Glantz, Gilmore and Lieberman12

Duration of untreated psychosis

Another frequently cited, indirect strand of evidence for the hypothesis that schizophrenia arises from progressive brain pathology that can be arrested by drug treatment is the association found in some studies (although not all) between the duration of untreated psychosis and outcome. However, it has long been recognised that conditions with a long and insidious early course are frequently more severe than those with a sudden onset. Duration of untreated psychosis is strongly related to mode of onset Reference Morgan, Abdul-Al, Lappin, Jones, Fearon and Leese13 and other characteristics of the psychosis itself, Reference Owens, Johnstone, Miller, Macmillan and Crow14 which makes it likely that it is simply a proxy measure of a more severe underlying condition. Research on duration of untreated psychosis and outcome has not adequately controlled for mode of onset and other potential confounding factors. Reference Bosanac, Patton and Castle15

Trials of early intervention have shown some positive results, but have not analysed the role of medication over and above other aspects of the intervention, and long-term results are disappointing (reviewed in Bosanac et al). Reference Bosanac, Patton and Castle15 Two trials of drug treatment for young people at high risk of psychosis suggested that the rate of conversion to psychosis was reduced, although not by a statistically significant degree in the larger of the two trials. Reference McGlashan, Zipursky, Perkins, Addington, Miller and Woods16 A larger naturalistic study has so far found that drug treatment has not reduced the onset of psychosis. Reference Walker, Cornblatt, Addington, Cadenhead, Cannon and McGlashan17

Evidence on neuroprotection

At a neuropathological level, ideas about drug treatment being neuroprotective developed because of evidence that some psychiatric drugs, notably lithium, increase activity in some pathways associated with neurotrophism and neurogenesis. Reference Hunsberger, Austin, Henter and Chen18 The functional implications of these findings are unclear, however. One study, for example, found that although lithium reduced levels of kainate-induced excitotoxic motor neuron cell death, surviving cells were not undamaged. Reference Caldero, Brunet, Tarabal, Piedrafita, Hereu and Ayala19 In any case, evidence of antipsychotics has not consistently demonstrated these sorts of effects. Reference Hunsberger, Austin, Henter and Chen18 The view that new atypical antipsychotics have a particular neuroprotective effect may derive from an animal study of olanzapine and clozapine that detected upregulation of the neuroprotective Bcl-2 (B-cell lymphoma 2) protein. Reference Bai, Zhang and Li20 However, Bcl-2 is also upregulated in neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's disease, where it is regarded as evidence of a compensatory mechanism. Other studies have not replicated this finding, but one study found increased activity of the pro-apoptotic protease capase-3 in animals treated with old and new antipsychotics. Reference Jarskog, Glantz, Gilmore and Lieberman21

Effects of antipsychotics, particularly atypicals, on cognitive function is also cited as evidence of their neuroprotective effects, but whether or not any antipsychotics improve cognition independently of symptoms remains uncertain. The suggested superior effects of atypical antipsychotics have also been questioned by the findings of the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) study, in which the greatest long-term improvements in cognitive function were seen in the perphenazine group. Reference Keefe, Bilder, Davis, Harvey, Palmer and Gold22

In contrast to ideas about neuroprotective effects, there is suggestive evidence that antipsychotics reduce brain tissue volume, as described above, Reference Moncrieff and Leo7 and they are known to cause the pathological brain syndrome known as tardive dyskinesia. Research suggests that as well as involuntary movements, tardive dyskinesia is associated with general cognitive decline, suggesting that antipsychotics can induce generalised brain dysfunction. Reference Waddington, O'Callaghan, Larkin and Kinsella23

Conclusions

Antipsychotics are undoubtedly useful in suppressing the symptoms of psychotic conditions, but the evidence presented here suggests there is little basis to the belief that they reverse an underlying neurodegenerative process in people with schizophrenia or psychosis. Neuropathological studies do not support the idea that antipsychotic drugs, including the new or atypical antipsychotics, have neuroprotective effects. Some research suggests they may even contribute to the decline in brain volume seen in people with these diagnoses, and they are known to induce neurological damage in the form of tardive dyskinesia in some long-term users. The idea that antipsychotic drugs are neuroprotective should not therefore be used as a justification for prescribing or continuing to prescribe them, if other considerations do not also support their use. Psychiatrists should be particularly cautious about the use of antipsychotics in the early or prodromal stages of psychosis, where, as others have pointed out, there is the potential to do much harm. Reference Bosanac, Patton and Castle15

References

1 Information Centre for Health and Social Care. Prescription Cost Analysis 2008. NHS Information Centre, 2009.Google Scholar
2 Olfson, M, Blanco, C, Liu, L, Moreno, C, Laje, G. National trends in the outpatient treatment of children and adolescents with antipsychotic drugs. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2006; 63: 679–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3 Healy, D. The latest mania: selling bipolar disorder. PLoS Med 2006; 3: e185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4 Lieberman, JA. Is schizophrenia a neurodegenerative disorder? A clinical and neurobiological perspective. Biol Psychiatry 1999; 46: 729–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5 Lieberman, JA, Tollefson, GD, Charles, C, Zipursky, R, Sharma, T, Kahn, RS, et al. Antipsychotic drug effects on brain morphology in first-episode psychosis. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005; 62: 361–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6 Dorph-Petersen, KA, Pierri, JN, Perel, JM, Sun, Z, Sampson, AR, Lewis, DA. The influence of chronic exposure to antipsychotic medications on brain size before and after tissue fixation: a comparison of haloperidol and olanzapine in macaque monkeys. Neuropsychopharmacology 2005; 30: 1649–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7 Moncrieff, J, Leo, J. A systematic review of the effects of antipsychotic drugs on brain volume. Psychol Med 2010; 40: 1409–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8 Takahashi, T, Wood, SJ, Yung, AR, Soulsby, B, McGorry, PD, Suzuki, M, et al. Progressive gray matter reduction of the superior temporal gyrus during transition to psychosis. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2009; 66: 366–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9 Lawrie, SM, Whalley, HC, Abukmeil, SS, Kestelman, JN, Miller, P, Best, JJK, et al. Temporal lobe volume changes in people at high risk of schizophrenia with psychotic symptoms. Br J Psychiatry 2002; 181: 138–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10 Jarskog, LF, Miyamoto, S, Lieberman, JA. Schizophrenia: new pathological insights and therapies. Annu Rev Med 2007; 58: 4961.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11 Chen, DC, Wang, J, Wang, B, Yang, SC, Zhang, CX, Zheng, YL, et al. Decreased levels of serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor in drug-naive first-episode schizophrenia: relationship to clinical phenotypes. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2009; 207: 375–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12 Jarskog, LF, Glantz, LA, Gilmore, JH, Lieberman, JA. Apoptotic mechanisms in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2005; 29: 846–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13 Morgan, C, Abdul-Al, R, Lappin, JM, Jones, P, Fearon, P, Leese, M, et al. Clinical and social determinants of duration of untreated psychosis in the ÆSOP first-episode psychosis study. Br J Psychiatry 2006; 189: 446–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14 Owens, DC, Johnstone, EC, Miller, P, Macmillan, JF, Crow, TJ. Duration of untreated illness and outcome in schizophrenia: test of predictions in relation to relapse risk. Br J Psychiatry 2010; 196: 296301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15 Bosanac, P, Patton, GC, Castle, DJ. Early intervention in psychotic disorders: faith before facts? Psychol Med 2010; 40: 353–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16 McGlashan, TH, Zipursky, RB, Perkins, D, Addington, J, Miller, T, Woods, SW, et al. Randomized, double-blind trial of olanzapine versus placebo in patients prodromally symptomatic for psychosis. Am J Psychiatry 2006; 163: 790–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17 Walker, EF, Cornblatt, BA, Addington, J, Cadenhead, KS, Cannon, TD, McGlashan, TH, et al. The relation of antipsychotic and antidepressant medication with baseline symptoms and symptom progression: a naturalistic study of the North American Prodrome Longitudinal Sample. Schizophr Res 2009; 115: 50–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18 Hunsberger, J, Austin, DR, Henter, ID, Chen, G. The neurotrophic and neuroprotective effects of psychotropic agents. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 2009; 11: 333–48.Google ScholarPubMed
19 Caldero, J, Brunet, N, Tarabal, O, Piedrafita, L, Hereu, M, Ayala, V, et al. Lithium prevents excitotoxic cell death of motoneurons in organotypic slice cultures of spinal cord. Neuroscience 2010; 165: 1353–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20 Bai, O, Zhang, H, Li, XM. Antipsychotic drugs clozapine and olanzapine upregulate bcl-2 mRNA and protein in rat frontal cortex and hippocampus. Brain Res 2004; 1010: 81–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21 Jarskog, LF, Glantz, LA, Gilmore, JH, Lieberman, JA. Apoptotic mechanisms in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2005; 29: 846–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22 Keefe, RS, Bilder, RM, Davis, SM, Harvey, PD, Palmer, BW, Gold, JM, et al. Neurocognitive effects of antipsychotic medications in patients with chronic schizophrenia in the CATIE Trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2007; 64: 633–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23 Waddington, JL, O'Callaghan, E, Larkin, C, Kinsella, A. Cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia: organic vulnerability factor or state marker for tardive dyskinesia? Brain Cogn 1993; 23: 5670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

eLetters

Neuroprotection, Resveratrol and Schizophrenia

30 March 2011
Feargus F. O'Croinin, Psychiatrist
The editorial by Moncrieff (1) is a refreshing reappraisal of the neuroprotective hypothesis as it relates to medication and early psychosis and schizophrenia. Clearly there is a need for better agents for neuroprotection in early psychosis and schizophrenia. One compound that has received little attention in psychiatry is the polyphenol, resveratrol, present in grapes and wine. Numerous studies... More
Conflict of interest: None Declared

Neuroprotective Hypothesis

30 March 2011
GEORGE M SIMPSON, Professor of Research Psychiatry
We were interested in Dr. Moncrieff’s thoughtful, troublesome but important editorial Questioning the Neuroprotective hypothesis (1). One part of this deals with duration of untreated psychosis and outcome and the flaws in some of these studies. We would like to remind readers of May’s early study published in the 60s before anti psychotics had been given their name(2). He compared first hospital admissions... More
Conflict of interest: None Declared

Oxidative cell stress in the debate on neuroprotection

08 March 2011
Peter Lepping, Consultant Psychiatrist, Visiting Professor, AMD
I read Dr Moncrieff's editorial with much interest and ceratinly agree in principle with her conclusion that antipsychotics are not currently proven to be neuroprotective (1). I was surprised though that she did not mention the influence of oxidative cell stress in the debate. In an improtant review Ng and colleagues' evidence points to oxidative stress as an important factor in the biologic... More
Conflict of interest: None Declared

The Language of Science

08 March 2011
Saad F Ghalib, consultant in old age psychiatry
It seems that the tendency of research in psychiatry to jump into conclusions based on incomplete evidence,has become the rule rather than the exception. Hardly,a day goes by without some new evidence supporting the beneficial effects of antipsychotics and antidepressants.However,research papaers(few and far between)that attest to the contrary(neuroleptic induced dysphoria,neuroleptic induced... More
Conflict of interest: None Declared

Reaching Cells

09 February 2011
Dr Peter John Gordon, Old Age Psychiatrist
Reply to the Editorial: Questioning the ‘neuroprotective’ hypothesis: does drug treatment prevent brain damage in early psychosis or schizophrenia? By Joanna Moncrieff. As an old age psychiatrist, you may not be surprised to know that neuroprotection is a matter that I willingly reconsider in light of advancing science. However I currently share Dr Moncrieff’s reading of the evidence: that... More
Conflict of interest: None Declared

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 235
Total number of PDF views: 301 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 02nd January 2018 - 23rd January 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Access
Hostname: page-component-76cb886bbf-tmbpq Total loading time: 0.813 Render date: 2021-01-23T17:05:17.130Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "1", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metrics": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "peerReview": true, "crossMark": true, "comments": true, "relatedCommentaries": true, "subject": true, "clr": true, "languageSwitch": true, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Questioning the ‘neuroprotective’ hypothesis: does drug treatment prevent brain damage in early psychosis or schizophrenia?
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Questioning the ‘neuroprotective’ hypothesis: does drug treatment prevent brain damage in early psychosis or schizophrenia?
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Questioning the ‘neuroprotective’ hypothesis: does drug treatment prevent brain damage in early psychosis or schizophrenia?
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *