Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

A Re-analysis of the Reliability of Psychiatric Diagnosis

  • Robert L. Spitzer (a1) and Joseph L. Fleiss (a2)

Extract

Classification systems such as diagnosis have two primary properties, reliability and validity. Reliability refers to the consistency with which subjects are classified; validity, to the utility of the system for its various purposes. In the case of psychiatric diagnosis, the purposes of the classification system are communication about clinical features, aetiology, course of illness and treatment. A necessary constraint on the validity of a system is its reliability. There is no guarantee that a reliable system is valid, but assuredly an unreliable system must be invalid.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      A Re-analysis of the Reliability of Psychiatric Diagnosis
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      A Re-analysis of the Reliability of Psychiatric Diagnosis
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      A Re-analysis of the Reliability of Psychiatric Diagnosis
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

References

Hide All
American Psychiatric Association (1952) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the Mental Disorders.
American Psychiatric Association (1968) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the Mental Disorders. 2nd Edition.
Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J. E., & Erbaugh, J. K. (1962). Reliability of psychiatric diagnoses: 2. A study of consistency of clinical judgments and ratings. Amer. J. Psychiat., 119, 351–7.
Cohen, J. (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ. psychol. Measmt., 20, 3746.
Cohen, J. (1968) Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol. Bull., 70, 213–20.
Cooper, J. E., Kendell, R. E., Gurland, B. J., Sharpe, L., Copeland, J. R. M. & Simon, R. (1972) Psychiatric Diagnosis in New York and London. (U.S.–U.K. Diagnostic Project.) London: Oxford University Press.
Copeland, J. R. M., Cooper, J. E., Kendell, R. E., & Gourlay, A. J. (1971) Differences in usage of diagnostic labels amongst psychiatrists in the British Isles. Brit. J. Psychiat., 118, 629–40.
Feighner, J. P., Robins, E., Guze, S. B., Woodruff, R. A., Winokur, G. & Munoz, R. (1972) Diagnostic criteria for use in psychiatric research. Arch. gen. Psychiat., 26, 5763.
Fleiss, J. L. (1971) Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychol. Bull., 76, 378–82.
Fleiss, J. L. & Cohen, J. (1973) The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educ. psychol. Measmt., 33, 613–19.
Fleiss, J. L. Spitzer, R. L., Endicott, J. & Cohen, J. (1972) Quantification of agreement in multiple psychiatric diagnosis. Arch. gen. Psychiat., 26, 168–71.
Gurland, B. J., Fleiss, J. L., Sharpe, L., Simon, R. & Barrett, J. E. (1972) The mislabeling of depressed patients in New York State hospitals. Disorders of Mood (eds. Zubin, J. & Freyhan, F. A.), pp. 1728. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
Her Majesty's Stationery Office (1968) A Glossary of Mental Disorders. General Register Office Studies on Medical and Population Subjects, no. 22.
Katz, M. M., Cole, J. O. & Lowry, H. A. (1969) Studies of the diagnostic process: The influence of symptom perception, past experience, and ethnic background on diagnostic decisions. Amer. J. Psychiat., 125, 937–47.
Kendell, R. E., Cooper, J. E., Gourlay, A. J., Copeland, J. R. M., Sharpe, L. & Gurland, B.J. (1971) The diagnostic criteria of American and British psychiatrists. Arch. gen. Psychiat., 25, 123–30.
Kreitman, N. (1961) The reliability of psychiatric diagnosis. J. ment. Sci., 107, 876–86.
Light, R.J. (1971) Measures of agreement for qualitative data: Some generalizations and alternatives. Psychol. Bull., 76, 365–77.
Lorr, M., McNair, D. M., Klett, C. J. & Lasky, J. J. (1962) Evidence of ten psychiatric syndromes. J. consult. Psychol, 26, 185–9.
Sandifer, M. G., Hordern, A., Timbury, G. C. & Green, L. M. (1968) Psychiatric diagnosis: A comparative study in North Carolina, London and Glasgow. Brit. J. Psychiat., 114, 19.
Sandifer, M. G., Pettus, C. & Quade, D. (1964) A study of psychiatric diagnosis. J. nerv. ment. Dis., 139, 350–6.
Schmidt, H. O. & Fonda, C. P. (1956) The reliability of psychiatrie diagnosis: A new look. J. abnor. soc., Psychol., 52, 262–7.
Sharpe, L., Gurland, B. J., Fleiss, J. L., Kendell, R. E., Cooper, J. E. & Copeland, J. R. M. Some comparisons of American, Canadian and British psychiatrists in their diagnostic concepts. Canad. J. Psychiat. In press.
Spitzer, R. L., Cohen, J., Fleiss, J. L. & Endicott, J. (1967a) Quantification of agreement in psychiatric diagnosis: A new approach. Arch. gen. Psychiat., 17, 83–7.
Spitzer, R. L., Endicott, J., Cohen, J. & Fleiss, J. L. Constraints on the validity of computer diagnosis. (In preparation).
Spitzer, R. L., Endicott, J., Fleiss, J. L. & Cohen, J. (1970) Psychiatric Status Schedule: A technique for evaluating psychopathology and impairment in role functioning. Arch. gen. Psychiat., 23, 4155.
Spitzer, R. L., Fleiss, J. L., Endicott, J. & Cohen, J. (1967b) Mental Status Schedule: Properties of factor analytically derived scales. Arch. gen. Psychiat., 16, 479–93.
Wing, J. K., Birley, J. L. T., Cooper, J. E., Graham, P. & Isaacs, A. D. (1967) Reliability of a procedure for measuring and classifying ‘present psychiatric state’. Brit. J. Psychiat, 113, 499515.
Zubin, J. (1967) Classification of the behavior disorders. In Annual Review of Psychology (eds. Farnsworth, P. R. & McNemar, O.). Palo Alto, California, Annual Reviews , pp. 373406.

A Re-analysis of the Reliability of Psychiatric Diagnosis

  • Robert L. Spitzer (a1) and Joseph L. Fleiss (a2)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed

A Re-analysis of the Reliability of Psychiatric Diagnosis

  • Robert L. Spitzer (a1) and Joseph L. Fleiss (a2)
Submit a response

eLetters

We encountered an error trying to retrieve eLetters for this article. Please try again or contact Customer Services

×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *