Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-cf9d5c678-gf4tf Total loading time: 0.301 Render date: 2021-07-28T01:30:56.497Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Suspending disbelief: do we unfairly distrust our patients?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2009 

As a medical student on the first day of my psychiatry attachment, I was sent to interview an in-patient with schizophrenia. I listened, innocent and enthralled, as he informed me in extensive detail how his employers had bugged his house, spiked his drinks, and recruited his neighbours to spy on him. ‘But that's outrageous!’ I exclaimed earnestly, ‘They can't be allowed to do that. Why don't you tell the police?’

Some years on, I am pleased to say that my ability to spot the floridly psychotic and delusional patient has improved. But two recent experiences have made me question whether psychiatrists sometimes go too far in the opposite direction. A young man with personality disorder known to psychiatric services presented to accident and emergency shortly after a relationship breakdown, claiming he was unable to move his left arm and leg. On hearing of his history, psychiatric opinion sought by the acute stroke team attributed his symptoms firmly to conversion disorder, deeming further investigations both unhelpful and unnecessary. Three days later, magnetic resonance imaging revealed a large right middle cerebral artery infarct. Within a week of this experience, it came to light that an elderly patient with advanced dementia and behavioural problems, who for months had been ignored as he repeatedly talked about his carers abusing him, had in fact been describing a real situation. Discussion with experienced psychiatrists revealed that such occurrences are by no means unique or isolated.

In practice, it is easy to dismiss any unusual or improbable claim a mentally ill patient makes as untrue. Being confronted by a daily barrage of unreality–ranging from the psychotic patient with frankly bizarre delusions, to the manipulative patient intending to deceive–psychiatrists perhaps more than any other specialists are at risk of developing blanket cynicism and distrust. Elyn Saks, an American professor of law and psychiatry who herself suffered from schizophrenia, describes in her autobiographical account (The Center Cannot Hold: My Journey Through Madness; Virago, 2007) how her own subarachnoid haemorrhage was missed by experienced doctors, based on the unspoken assumption that anything a patient with a psychiatric history said was untrue. Is this attitude just another form of stigmatisation of people with mental illness?

Clearly we cannot believe everything we hear. But perhaps we should be more amenable to keeping an open mind, guarding against our own prejudices, and to investigating further in cases of uncertainty. This approach not only reduces the risk of missing a real physical or social problem, but also helps us to develop open and supportive relationships with vulnerable patients. For few things destroy trust and hope more effectively than being disbelieved when we really are telling the truth.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.
You have Access

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Suspending disbelief: do we unfairly distrust our patients?
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Suspending disbelief: do we unfairly distrust our patients?
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Suspending disbelief: do we unfairly distrust our patients?
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *