We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 July 2009
Considerations of developing realistic acting styles on the English stage between the debut of Macready in 1817 and the triumph of Fechter in 1860 usually focus their attention on Macready, Charles Kean, and Phelps. Although these three men differed significantly in their approaches to acting, their styles shared in common a romantic goal that René Wellek attributes to Coleridge: “to domesticate the wonderful.” The means of attaining this goal varied. Macready relied on developing the audience's appreciation of his conscious artifice at playing domesticated points. He was, consequently, less realistic than Phelps and Kean, who were primarily concerned with trying to make an audience feel what they believed their characters felt. This concern with transmitting character feeling is compatible with Kean's excellence at gentlemanly melodrama and Phelps' ability at playing the pathetic elements in comic characters.
1 Wellek, René and Warren, Austin, A Theory of Literature (New York, 1942), p. 242Google Scholar.
2 Allen, Shirley, Samuel Phelps and The Sadler's Wells Theatre (Middletown, Conn., 1969), p. 167Google Scholar.
3 Watson, Ernest Bradlee, Sheridan to Robertson: A Study of The Nineteenth Century London Stage (Cambridge, Mass., 1926), p. 322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Ibid., and Duerr, Edwin, The Length and Depth of Acting (New York, 1962), p. 357Google Scholar.
5 Rowell, George, The Victorian Theatre (Oxford, 1956), p. 26Google Scholar.
6 Macready, William Charles, Reminiscences, Diaries, and Letters, ed. Pollock, F. (New York, 1875), p. 130Google Scholar.
7 Toynbee, William, ed., The Diaries of William Charles Macready, 2 vols. (London, 1912), I, 107Google Scholar.
8 Lewes, George Henry, On Actors and The Art of Acting 2 vols. in one (New York, n.d.), I, 64Google Scholar.
9 Ibid.
10 See Favorini, Attilio, “The Last Tragedian: Robert B. Mantell and The American Theatre” (diss., Yale, 1969), pp. 65–66Google Scholar.
11 See obituary from the New York Spirit of The Times quoted in ibid., and Brown, Eluned, ed., The London Theatre, 1811–1866: Selections From The Diary of Henry Crabb Robinson (London, 1966), p. 150Google Scholar.
12 Marston, J.Westland, Our Recent Actors, 2 vols. (London, 1888), II, 160Google Scholar.
13 Coleman, John, Players and Playwrights I Have Known, 2 vols. (Philadelphia, 1890), I, 233, states: “Elegant, accomplished, finished as he was in everything he touched, he was always, or nearly always, Charles Mathews.” Marston is of the same opinion: “Generally, Mr. Mathews imparted a good deal of his own personality into his various assumptions” (II, 160). Lewes goes even further in stating: “I now see, in retrospect, that it was the charm of the man rather than any peculiar talent in the actor which carried him so successfully.…” (I, 76)Google Scholar.
14 The only twentieth century considerations of Wigan are contained in Downer's, Alan S. “Players and the Painted Stage: Nineteenth Century Acting,” PMLA, LI (1946), 557–558, and Watson, p. 371Google Scholar.
15 DNB, XXI, 188Google Scholar.
16 Athenaeum, 12 February 1842, p. 150: “Mr. Wigan looks and speaks the part of a French valet to the life.”Google Scholar
17 Ibid., 17 September 1842, p. 822.
18 Times, 4 October 1847, p. 5Google Scholar.
19 Athenaeum, 15 July 1848, p. 708Google Scholar.
20 Times, 13 July 1848, p. 4Google Scholar.
21 Spectator, 6 January 1849, p. 6Google Scholar.
22 Athenaeum, 3 November 1849, p. 1350Google Scholar.
23 Times, 25 October 1854, p. 9Google Scholar.
24 Ibid., 16 May 1855, p. 9.
25 Saturday Review, XII (1861), 560: “It is quite possible that the artist [Wigan] in his extreme anxiety to avoid caricature, may glide into the opposite extreme of missing character altogether.… ”Google Scholar
26 Daily Telegraph, 24 December 1860Google Scholar.
27 See, e. g., Coleman, I, 269.
28 Athenaeum, 18 November 1848, p. 1155Google Scholar.
29 Times, 13 November 1848, p. 4Google Scholar.
30 Athenaeum, 6 January 1849, p. 18Google Scholar.
31 Ibid., 5 October 1850, p. 1051.
32 Ibid., 8 February 1851, p. 171.
33 Ibid., 29 November 1851, p. 1259.
34 Athenaeum, 14 February 1852, p. 259Google Scholar.
35 Coleman, II, 478.
36 Athenaeum, 15 May 1852, p. 554Google Scholar.
37 Morley, Henry, The Journal of a Victorian Playgoer from 1851 to 1866 (London, 1891), p. 223Google Scholar.
38 Coleman, I, 274.
39 Marston, II, 269.
40 Times, 18 October 1853, p. 4Google Scholar.
41 See advertisement in Times, 17 October 1853Google Scholar.
42 Theatrical Journal, XIV (14 12 1853), p. 395Google Scholar.
43 Times, 27 December 1853, p. 10Google Scholar.
44 Season derived from advertisements in the Times.
45 See as an instance Athenaeum, 21 October 1854, p. 1269Google Scholar.
46 Nicoll, Allardyce, A History of English Drama 1660–1900, 5 vols. 2nd edition (Cambridge, 1959), IV, 47CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
47 Times, 25 October 1854, p. 9Google Scholar.
48 Athenaeum, 1 August 1857, p. 980Google Scholar.
49 Coleman, II, 21.
50 Houghton, Walter E., The Victorian Frame of Mind, 1830–1870 (New Haven, 1957), p. 155Google Scholar; see also, p. 184 .
51 Spectator, 6 January 1849, p. 6Google Scholar.
52 Himmelfarb, Gertrude, Victorian Minds (New York, 1968), p. 289.—Subsequently, the aristocratic and lower classes embraced the ideals developed by the middle class and transformed them into national political policies. See Himmelfarb, p. 277 and Houghton, p. 5Google Scholar.
53 Times, 25 October 1854, p. 9Google Scholar.
54 Houghton, p. 190.
