Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T09:08:06.464Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Important but De-centred: ASEAN's Role in the Southeast Asian Human Rights Space

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2016

Mathew Davies*
Affiliation:
Mathew Davies, Department of International Relations, Coral Bell School of Asia Pacific Affairs, ANU College of Asia and the Pacific, the Australian National University;mathew.davies@anu.edu.au

Abstract

In this article, I argue that to capture ASEAN's importance in the promotion and protection of human rights requires embedding the analysis of what ASEAN says and does into an awareness of the broader human rights space of which it is a part. The Southeast Asian human rights space has four dimensions: ASEAN, domestic institutions, civil society, and the global United Nations system, all of which are increasingly linked together in a complex whole. Revealing this human rights space suggests three conclusions. First, ASEAN is important as an educator, enabler, standard setter, and mobiliser of human rights, often despite its flawed institutional design. This importance is the product of its own activities and how it is used by other actors. Second, ASEAN member states engage with each other on questions of human rights broadly, and not only through ASEAN, which illustrates the limits and resilience of the ‘ASEAN Way’ as a set of procedural norms. Third, ASEAN, despite its growing importance to human rights promotion, has become increasingly de-centred in that field, with serious consequences for its own security agenda.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Institute for East Asian Studies, Sogang University 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acharya, Amitav. 2001. Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav. 2004. How ideas spread: whose norms matter? Norm localization and institutional change in Asian regionalism. International Organization 58(2), 239275.Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav and Stubbs, Richard. 2006. Theorizing Southeast Asian relations: an introduction. Pacific Review 19(2), 125134.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J. and Meunier, Sophie. 2009. The politics of international regime complexity. Perspectives on Politics 7(1), 1324.Google Scholar
APHR (ASEAN Parliamentarians for Human Rights). 2015. Disenfranchisement and Desperation in Myanmar's Rakhine State: Drivers of a Regional Crisis. Available at: http://aseanmp.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/APHR_Rakhine-State-Report.pdf (accessed on 4 October 2016).Google Scholar
APHR (ASEAN Parliamentarians for Human Rights). 2016. Min Open Letter, MPs Call on Pres. Obama to Prioritize Human Rights during US-ASEAN Summit. 11 February. Available at: http://aseanmp.org/2016/02/11/open-letter-us-asean-summit/ (accessed on 4 October 2016).Google Scholar
ASEAN. 1988. Declaration of the Advancement of Women in the ASEAN Region. Bangkok, Thailand, 5 July. Available at: http://asean.org/?static_post=declaration-of-the-advancement-of-women-in-the-asean-region-bangkok-thailand-5-july-1988 (accessed on 5 October 2016).Google Scholar
ASEAN. 2004. Declaration on the Elimination of Violence Against Women in the ASEAN Region. Jakarta. Available at: https://cil.nus.edu.sg/2004/2004-declaration-on-the-elimination-of-violence-against-women-in-the-asean-region/ (accessed on 5 October 2016).Google Scholar
ASEAN. 2007. The ASEAN Charter. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat, 20 November.Google Scholar
ASEAN. 2009a. ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights (Terms of Reference). Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat. Available at: http://aichr.org/?dl_name=TOR-of-AICHR.pdf (accessed on 5 October 2016).Google Scholar
ASEAN. 2009b. ASEAN Terms of Reference on the Rights of Women and Children. Jakarta. ASEAN Secretariat. Available at: http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/research/Philippines/ASEAN%20TOR%20on%20the%20%20Rights%20of%20Women%20and%20Children.pdf (accessed on 4 October 2016).Google Scholar
ASEAN. 2015a. ASEAN 2025: Forging Ahead Together. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat, November. Available at http://www.asean.org/storage/2015/12/ASEAN-2025-Forging-Ahead-Together-final.pdf (accessed on 4 October 2016).Google Scholar
ASEAN. 2015b. Five-Year Work Plan of the ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights (2016–2020). Available at: http://aichr.org/?dl_name=AICHR_Five-Year_Work_Plan_2016-2020.pdf (accessed on 4 October 2016).Google Scholar
ASEAN. 2015c. Guidelines on the AICHR's Relations with Civil Society Organisations. Available at: http://aichr.org/?dl_name=Guidelines_On_The_AICHRS_Relations_With__CSOs.pdf (accessed on 4 October 2016).Google Scholar
Bell, Daniel A. 2000. East Meets West: Human Rights and Democracy in East Asia. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bellamy, Alex J. and Drummond, Catherine. 2011. The responsibility to protect in Southeast Asia: between non-interference and sovereignty as responsibility. Pacific Review 24(2), 179200.Google Scholar
Caballero-Anthony, Mely. 2014. Understanding ASEAN's centrality: bases and prospects in an evolving regional architecture. Pacific Review 27(4), 563584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capie, David. 2012. The responsibility to protect norm in Southeast Asia: framing, resistance and the localization myth. Pacific Review 25(1), 7593.Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2005. International institutions and socialization in Europe: introduction and framework. International Organization 59(4), 801826.Google Scholar
Davies, Mathew. 2013. ASEAN and human rights norms: constructivism, rational choice, and the action-identity gap. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 13(2), 207231.Google Scholar
Davies, Mathew. 2014. An agreement to disagree: the ASEAN Human Rights Declaration and the absence of regional identity in Southeast Asia. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 33(3), 107129.Google Scholar
Davies, Mathew. 2016. Women and development, not gender and politics: explaining ASEAN's failure to engage with the Women, Peace and Security agenda. Contemporary Southeast Asia 38(1), 106127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Sara E., Kimberly, Nackers, and Sarah, Teitt. 2014. Women, Peace and Security as an ASEAN priority. Australian Journal of International Affairs 68(3), 333355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djamin, Rafendi. 2012. Keynote speech at the 19th ASEAN Intergovernmental Colloquium on Human Rights. Manila, Philippines, 26 November. Available at: https://www.facebook.com/isdsphilippines/posts/489820414383606 (accessed on 4 October 2016).Google Scholar
Eldridge, Philip. 2002. Emerging roles of national human rights institutions in Southeast Asia. Pacifica Review 14(3), 209226.Google Scholar
Englehart, Neil A. 2000. Rights and cultures in the Asian values argument: the rise and fall of Confucian ethics in Singapore. Human Rights Quarterly 22(2), 548568.Google Scholar
European Parliament 2015. Resolution P8_TA-PROV(2015)0465. 17 December. Available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P8-TA-2015-0465+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN (accessed on 4 October 2016).Google Scholar
FIDH: Worldwide Movement for Human Rights. 2012. Civil Society Rejects Flawed ASEAN Human Rights Declaration. Press Release, 15 November. Available at: https://www.fidh.org/en/international-advocacy/other-regional-organisations/asean/Civil-society-rejects-flawed-ASEAN-12429 (accessed on 4 October 2016).Google Scholar
Gaer, Felice D. 2007. A voice not an echo: Universal Periodic Review and the UN treaty body system. Human Rights Law Review 7(1), 109139.Google Scholar
Gerard, Kelly. 2013. From the ASEAN People's Assembly to the ASEAN Civil Society Conference: the boundaries of civil society advocacy. Contemporary Politics 19(4), 411426.Google Scholar
Gerard, Kelly. 2014. ASEAN and civil society activities in “created spaces”: the limits of liberty. Pacific Review 27(2), 265287.Google Scholar
Ginbar, Yuval. 2010. Human rights in ASEAN – setting sail or treading water? Human Rights Law Review 10(3), 504518.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2012. Civil Society Denounces Adoption of Flawed ASEAN Human Rights Declaration. 19 November. Available at: https://www.hrw.org/news/2012/11/19/civil-society-denounces-adoption-flawed-asean-human-rights-declaration (accessed on 4 October 2016).Google Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew. 2007. One world? Many worlds? The place of regions in the study of international society. International Affairs 83(1), 127146.Google Scholar
Jetschke, Anja and Rüland, Jürgen. 2009. Decoupling rhetoric and practice: the cultural limits of ASEAN cooperation. Pacific Review 22(2), 179203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Lee. 2010. ASEAN's unchanged melody? The theory and practice of ‘non-interference’ in Southeast Asia. Pacific Review 23(4), 479502.Google Scholar
Jones, Lee. 2011. ASEAN, Sovereignty and Intervention in Southeast Asia. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Jong, Hans Nicholas. 2016. Komnas to launch rights guidelines for business. Jakarta Post. 20 January. Available at: http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2016/01/20/komnas-launch-rights-guidelines-business.html (accessed on 4 October 2016).Google Scholar
Katsumata, Hiro. 2009. ASEAN and human rights: resisting Western pressure or emulating the West? Pacific Review 22(5), 619637.Google Scholar
Katsumata, Hiro. 2014. What explains ASEAN's leadership in East Asian community building? Pacific Affairs 87(2), 247264.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E. and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Dongwook. 2013. International nongovernmental organizations and the global diffusion of national human rights institutions. International Organization 67(3), 505539.Google Scholar
Kraft, Herman. 2012. RtoP by increments: the AICHR and localizing the Responsibility to Protect in Southeast Asia. Pacific Review 25(1), 2749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1982. Structural causes and regime consequences: regimes as intervening variables. International Organization 36(2), 185205.Google Scholar
Kuhonta, Erik Martinez. 2006. Walking a tightrope: democracy versus sovereignty in ASEAN's illiberal peace. Pacific Review 19(3), 337358.Google Scholar
Linton, Suzannah. 2008. ASEAN states, their reservations to human rights treaties and the proposed ASEAN Commission on Women and Children. Human Rights Quarterly 30(2), 436493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, James. 2010. The relationship between the origins and regime design of the ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights (AICHR). International Journal of Human Rights 15(8), 130.Google Scholar
Muntarbhorn, Vitit. 2013. Unity in Connectivity?: Evolving Human Rights Mechanisms in the ASEAN Region. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
Narine, Shaun. 2012. Human rights norms and the evolution of ASEAN: moving without moving in a changing regional environment. Contemporary Southeast Asia 34(3), 365388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nischalke, Tobias Ingo. 2000. Insights from ASEAN's foreign policy co-operation: the ‘ASEAN way’, a real spirit or a phantom? Contemporary Southeast Asia 22(1), 89112.Google Scholar
Nuland, Victoria. 2012. ASEAN Declaration on Human Rights. US Department of State Press Statement, 20 November. Available at: http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2012/11/200915.htm (accessed on 4 October 2016).Google Scholar
Peou, Sorpong. 2002. Realism and constructivism in Southeast Asian security studies today: a review essay. Pacific Review 15(1), 119138.Google Scholar
Pillay, Navanethem. 2012. Strengthening the United Nations Human Rights Treaty Body System. New York: UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights.Google Scholar
Redondo, Elivira Dominguez. 2008. The Universal Periodic Review of the UN Human Rights Council: an assessment of the first session. Chinese Journal of International Law 7(3), 721734.Google Scholar
Renshaw, Catherine Shanahan. 2013. The ASEAN Human Rights Declaration 2012. Human Rights Law Review 13(3), 557579.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1999. The socialization of international human rights norms into domestic practices: introduction. In Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen C. and Sikkink, Kathryn (eds.), The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change, pp. 138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen C. and Sikkink, Kathryn. (eds.). 1999. The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ryu, Yongwook and Ortuoste, Maria. 2014. Democratization, regional integration, and human rights: the case of the ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights. Pacific Review 27(3), 357382.Google Scholar
Schimmelfennig, Frank and Sedelmeier, Ulrich. 2005. The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
SEANF (South East Asia National Human Rights Institution Forum). 2010. Paper on Migrant Workers. Kuala Lumpur: SEANF. Available at: http://apmigration.ilo.org/resources/resource-content/south-east-asia-national-human-rights-institution-forum-seanf-paper-on-migrant-workers (accessed on 4 October 2016).Google Scholar
UN (United Nations). 2014. Human Rights Council. Summary prepared by the office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights in Accordance with Paragraph 15/C of the Annex to Human Rights Council Resolution 5/1 and Paragraph 5 of the Annex to Council Resolution 16/21. Lao People's Democratic Republic. 24 October. Available at: https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G14/191/35/PDF/G1419135.pdf?OpenElement (accessed on 4 October 2016).Google Scholar
UN (United Nations). 2015. Human Rights Council. Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review: Myanmar. A/HRC/31/13. 23 December. Available at: https://www.upr-info.org/sites/default/files/document/myanmar/session_23_-_november_2015/a_hrc_31_13_e.pdf (accessed on 5 October 2016).Google Scholar