We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 September 2016
Height is rarely taken seriously by historians. Demographic and archaeological studies tend to explore height as a symptom of health and nutrition, rather than in its own right, and cultural studies of the human body barely study it at all. Its absence from the history of gender is surprising, given that it has historically been discussed within a highly gendered moral language. This paper therefore explores height through the lens of masculinity and focuses on the eighteenth century, when height took on a peculiar cultural significance in Britain. On the one hand, height could be associated with social status, political power and ‘polite’ refinement. On the other, it could connote ambition, militarism, despotism, foreignness and even castration. The article explores these themes through a case-study of John Montagu, earl of Sandwich, who was famously tall and was frequently caricatured as such. As well as exploring representations of the body, the paper also considers corporeal experiences and biometric realities of male height. It argues that histories of masculinity should study both representations of gender and their physical manifestations.
I would like to thank Michèle Cohen, the journal's referees and audiences in Northampton, Oxford and London for their feedback on this article.
1 Quoted in Nick Foulkes, Dancing into Battle: A Social History of the Battle of Waterloo (2007), 96.
2 Franklin, Andrea and Philp, Mark, Napoleon and the Invasion of Britain (Oxford, 2003)Google Scholar.
3 Robb, John and Harris, Oliver, The Body in History: Europe from the Palaeolithic to the Future (Cambridge, 2013), 35 Google Scholar.
4 It is ignored in Turner, Bryan’s pioneering The Body and Society (Oxford, 1984)Google Scholar and mentioned only in passing in Anthony Synott's The Body Social: Symbolism, Self and Society (1993). Tellingly, the key work here is in the genre of popular sociology: Keyes, Ralph, The Height of Your Life (Boston, MA, 1980)Google Scholar.
5 As noted by Roper, Lyndal: ‘Beyond Discourse Theory’, Women's History Review, 19 (2010), 307–19 at 316CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
6 Geiske, Sabine, ‘The Ideal Couple: A Question of Size?’, in Feminism and the Body, ed. Schiebinger, Londa (Oxford, 2000), 375–96Google Scholar.
7 Kuntz, Stephen, ‘Making a Long Story Short: A Note on Men's Height and Mortality in England from the First through the Nineteenth Centuries’, Medical History, 31 (1987), 269–80 at 270CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
8 Floud, Roderick, Wacher, Kenneth and Gregory, Annabel, Height, Health and History: Nutritional Status in the United Kingdom (Cambridge, 1990), 29, 151CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Nicholas, Stephen and Steckel, Richard, ‘Heights and Living Standards of English Workers during the Early Years of Industrialization’, Journal of Economic History, 51 (1991), 937–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Nicholas, Stephen and Oxley, Deborah, ‘The Living Standards of Women during the Industrial Revolution’, Economic History Review, 46 (1993), 723–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Koepke, Nikola and Baten, Jeorg, ‘The Biological Standard of Living in Europe during the Last Two Millennia’, European Review of Economic History, 9 (2005), 61–95 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
9 Floud, Wacher and Gregory, Height, Health and History, 10.
10 Ibid., 1.
11 The Gentleman's Magazine, July 1798, 626. I am grateful to Gillian Williamson for this reference.
12 Keyes, Height of Your Life, chs. 4 and 5.
13 Grose, Francis, A Classical Dictionary of the Vulgar Tongue (London, 1785), GIL, JAC, GIM, DUKGoogle Scholar.
14 As recently advocated by Tosh, John: ‘The History of Masculinity: An Outdated Concept?’, in What is Masculinity? Historical Dynamics from Antiquity to the Contemporary World, ed. Arnold, John and Brady, Sean (Basingstoke, 2011), 17–34 Google Scholar.
15 Orbach, Susie, Fat is a Feminist Issue (London, 1984)Google Scholar.
16 For example: Gilman, Sander, Obesity: The Biography (Oxford, 2010)Google Scholar; Forth, Christopher, ‘Fat, Desire and Disgust in the Colonial Imagination’, History Workshop Journal, 73 (2012), 211–39CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Fat: Culture and Materiality, ed. Christopher Forth and Alison Leitch (2014).
17 Hays, J. Daniel, ‘Reconsidering the Height of Golaith’, Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, 48 (2005), 702–15Google Scholar.
18 Every Man Entertained: Or, Select Histories: Giving an Account of Persons who have been Most Eminently Distinguish'd by their Virtues or Vices, their Perfections or Defects, either of Body or Mind (1756), 41.
19 ‘The true effigies of the German Giant, now to be seen at the Swan near Charing-Cross, whose Stature is nine foot and a half in height, and the Span of his Hand a Cubit compleat. He goes from place to place with his Wife, who is but of ordinary Stature, and takes Money for the Show of her Husband’ (handbill, 1668).
20 Robb and Harris, The Body in History, 177. Caroline Nielsen has pointed out to me that Byrne is a cause célèbre in heritage studies, regarding the ethics of displaying human remains.
21 Regimen Sanitatis Salerni: Or, The School of Salernes Regiment of Health (1649).
22 Laqueur, Thomas, Making Sex: Body and Gender from the Greeks to Freud (New Haven, 1990)Google Scholar.
23 A treatise of military medicine of 1797 noted that tall soldiers are more prone to leg ulcers and are less able to bear tropical climates: Everard Home, Practical Observations on the Treatment of Ulcers on the Legs, Considered as a Branch of Military Surgery (1797).
24 Keyes, Height of Your Life, 37–9.
25 Roy Porter, Flesh in the Age of Reason: How the Enlightenment Transformed the Way we See our Bodies and Souls (2003), 234.
26 David M. Turner, ‘The Body Beautiful’, in A Cultural History of the Human Body in the Enlightenment, ed. Carol Reeves (2010), 113–32 at 123.
27 Onania: Or, the Heinous Sin of Self-Pollution, and all its Frightful Consequences (in Both Sexes) Consider'd, 6th edn (1730), 145.
28 Porter, Flesh in the Age of Reason, 60.
29 Rauser, Amelia, ‘Hair, Authenticity and the Self-Made Macaroni’, Eighteenth-Century Studies, 38 (2004), 101–17 at 107CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
30 Quoted in John Brooke, The Chatham Administration, 1766–68 (1956), 71. Contemporary satires to this effect included John Combe's The Diaboliad: A Poem, Dedicated to the Worst Man in His Majesty's Dominions (1777), 4–5:
Note the allusion at the end to his stooping frame, also rendered in the caricature.
31 ‘Stolen or Strayed’ (handbill: Newcastle, 1820): British Library 8135.e.3(24).
32 Koepke and Baten, ‘Biological Standard of Living’, 83–4.
33 Nicholas and Steckel, ‘Heights and Living Standards’, 945.
34 Porter, Flesh in the Age of Reason, 246–7.
35 Mukerji, Chandra, Territorial Ambitions and the Gardens of Versailles (Cambridge, 1997), 245 Google Scholar.
36 Harvey, Karen, ‘Men of Parts: Masculine Embodiment and the Male Leg in Eighteenth-Century England’, Journal of British Studies, 54 (2015), 797–821 at 797CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
37 Kuchta, David, The Three-Piece Suit and Modern Masculinity: England 1550–1850 (Berkeley, 2002)Google Scholar.
38 For example, a pair of men's silk brocade mules from c. 1707 have heels measuring 60mm. Northampton Museum P.53.1971.
39 Elizabeth Semmelhack, Heights of Fashion: A History of the Elevated Shoe (Reading, 2008).
40 Turner, ‘The Body Beautiful’, 114.
41 Jane C. Desmond, ‘Embodying Difference: Issues in Dance and Cultural Studies’, Cultural Critique (Winter 1994), 33–63 at 38.
42 Stephen Philpott, An Essay on the Advantage of a Polite Education Joined with a Learned One (1747), 73, 28–9.
43 Alun Withey, Technology, Self-Fashioning and Politeness in Eighteenth-Century Britain: Refined Bodies (2016), 27.
44 Nicholas Andry, Orthopædia: Or, the Art of Correcting and Preventing Deformities in Children (1743), 77.
45 Withey, Technology, 28, 22.
46 Andry, Orthopædia, 63.
47 Shellabarger, Samuel, Lord Chesterfield and his World (New York, 1971), 109 Google Scholar.
48 Chesterfield to Stanhope, 30 Dec. 1748: Lord Chesterfield's Letters, ed. David Roberts (Oxford, 1992), 130.
49 Chesterfield to Stanhope, 27 Sept. 1749: Chesterfield's Letters, ed. Roberts, 165.
50 McCormack, Matthew, The Independent Man: Citizenship and Gender Politics in Georgian England (Manchester, 2005), ch. 5Google Scholar.
51 David Bell, The First Total War: Napoleon's Europe and the Birth of Modern Warfare (2007), ch. 1.
52 As noted by Nicholas and Steckel. They instead use data collected from transported convicts, which they argue is more representative of the wider population, not least because it includes women: ‘Heights and Living Standards’, 942.
53 Circular from the Adjutant General's Office, 10 Dec. 1792: The National Archives, Kew, London, WO3/11 fo. 15.
54 Floud, Wacher and Gregory, Height, Health and History, 201.
55 C. E. Warnery, quoted in Christopher Duffy, The Military Experience in the Age of Reason (1987), 94–6.
56 Quoted in ibid., 94.
57 McCormack, Matthew, ‘Dance and Drill: Polite Accomplishments and Military Masculinities in Georgian Britain’, Cultural and Social History, 8 (2011), 315–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
58 Bennett Cuthbertson, A System for the Compete Interior Management and Oeconomy of a Battalion of Infantry (1779), 52.
59 Hollander, Anne, Seeing through Clothes (Berkeley, 1993), 227 Google Scholar.
60 Quoted in F. L. Carsten, ‘British Diplomacy and the Giant Grenadiers of Frederick William I’, History Today (Nov. 1951), 55–60 at 57.
61 London Magazine, Or Gentleman's Monthly Intelligencer, 28 (1759), 723.
62 Duffy, Michael, The Englishman and the Foreigner (Cambridge, 1986), 15 Google Scholar.
63 Joncus, Berta, ‘One God, so many Farinellis: Mythologizing the Star Castrato’, British Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies, 28 (2005), 437–96 at 440CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
64 Clapton, Nicholas, ‘Carol Broschi Farinelli: Aspects of his Technique and Performance’, British Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies, 28 (2005), 323–38 at 325CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
65 Roger Pickering, Reflections upon Theatrical Expression in Tragedy (1754), 63.
66 [Attr. William Hogarth,] ‘Berenstadt, Cuzzoni and Senesino’ (1723): British Museum Satires 1768.
67 Freitas, Roger, ‘The Eroticism of Emasculation: Confronting the Baroque Body of the Castrato’, Journal of Musicology, 20 (2003), 196–249 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
68 Berry, Helen, The Castrato and his Wife (Oxford, 2011)Google Scholar.
69 It is worth noting that the height of manual workers today is lower than that of non-manual workers: Walker, M., Shaper, A. and Wannamethee, G., ‘Height and Social Class in Middle-Aged British Men’, Journal of Epidemiol Public Health, 43 (1988), 299–303 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
70 J. K. Laughton, ‘Montagu, John, Fourth Earl of Sandwich (1718–1792)’, in Dictionary of National Biography, ed. Sidney Lee (1894): www.oxforddnb.com/view/olddnb/19026, accessed 21 July 2015.
71 ‘Public opinion rightly condemned the men who for mere party ends thus sacrificed the ties of friendship.’ Laughton, ‘Montagu’.
72 N. A. M. Rodger, The Insatiable Earl: A Life of John Montagu, 4th Earl of Sandwich (1993), xvi; see also John Brewer, Sentimental Murder: Love and Madness in the Eighteenth Century (2004), 101.
73 Laughton, ‘Montagu’.
74 Horace Walpole, Memoirs and Portraits, ed. Mathew Hodgart (1963), 27.
75 J. Cradock, Literary and Miscellaneous Memoirs (4 vols., 1828), iv, 165–6.
76 Ibid., iv, 163.
77 Eileen Harris, The Townshend Album (1974), figs. 23 and 24a.
78 Rodger, Insatiable Earl, caption to fig. 6.
79 P. J. Grosley, A Tour to London, trans. T. Nugent (2 vols., 1772), i, 149.
80 Rodger, Insatiable Earl, 79.
81 Ibid., 320.
82 Brewer, Sentimental Murder, 112.
83 The North Briton from No. I to No. XLVI Inclusive (1769), 161.
84 Brewer, Sentimental Murder.
85 McCormack, The Independent Man, 110.
86 Robert Dighton, ‘The Contrast – A Park Scene’ (1780): British Museum Satires 9665.
87 Geiske, ‘The Ideal Couple’.
88 Tosh, John, ‘Gentlemanly Politeness and Manly Simplicity in Victorian England’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 12 (2002), 455–72CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.
89 Joanne Begiato, ‘Manly Bodies in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century England’, Royal Historical Society website, 4 Sept. 2015: http://royalhistsoc.org/joanne-bailey-manly-bodies-in-eighteenth-and-nineteenth-century-england/, accessed 31 Mar. 2016. See also Begiato, Joanne, ‘Between Poise and Power: Embodied Manliness in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-century British Culture’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 26 (2016), 125–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
90 Edward L. Munson, The Theory and Practice of Military Hygiene (1901), 1, 12–13.
91 Tosh, ‘History of Masculinity’, 20.
