Skip to main content
×
×
Home

A Geometric Morphometric Assessment of Hand Shape and Comparison to the 2D:4D Digit Ratio as a Marker of Sexual Dimorphism

  • Paul G. Sanfilippo (a1), Alex W. Hewitt (a1), Jenny A. Mountain (a2) and David A. Mackey (a3)
Abstract

Twin studies are extremely useful for investigating hypotheses of genetic influence on a range of behavioral and physical traits in humans. Studies of physical traits, however, are usually limited to size-related biological characteristics because it is inherently difficult to quantify the morphological counterpart – shape. In recent years, the development of geometry-preserving analytical techniques built upon multivariate statistical methodologies has produced a new discipline in biological shape analysis known as geometric morphometrics. In this study of hand shape analysis, we introduce the reader already familiar with the field of twin research to the potential utility of geometric morphometrics and demonstrate the cross-discipline applicability of methods. We also investigate and compare the efficacy of the 2D:4D ratio, a commonly used marker of sexual dimorphism, to the fully multivariate approach of shape analysis in discriminating between male and female sex. Studies of biological shape variation utilizing geometric morphometric techniques may be completed with software freely available on the Internet and time invested to master the small learning curve in concepts and theory.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      A Geometric Morphometric Assessment of Hand Shape and Comparison to the 2D:4D Digit Ratio as a Marker of Sexual Dimorphism
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      A Geometric Morphometric Assessment of Hand Shape and Comparison to the 2D:4D Digit Ratio as a Marker of Sexual Dimorphism
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      A Geometric Morphometric Assessment of Hand Shape and Comparison to the 2D:4D Digit Ratio as a Marker of Sexual Dimorphism
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Professor David A. Mackey, Lions Eye Institute, Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Western Australia, 2 Verdun St Nedlands WA 6009, Australia. E-mail: D.Mackey@utas.edu.au
References
Hide All
Adams D. C., Rohlf F. J., & Slice D. (2004). Geometric morphometrics: Ten years of progress following the ‘revolution’. Italian Journal of Zoology, 71, 516.
Barut Ç., Demirel P., & Kiran S. (2008). Evaluation of hand anthropometric measurements and grip strength in basketball, volleyball and handball players. Anatomy, 2, 5559.
Buffa R., Marini E., Cabras S., Scalas G., & Floris G. (2007). Patterns of hand variation — New data on a Sardinian sample. Collegium Antropologicum, 31, 325330.
Dryden I. L., Oxborrow N., & Dickson R. (2008). Familial relationships of normal spine shape. Statistics in Medicine, 27, 19932003.
Fink B., Grammer K., Mitteroecker P., Gunz P., Schaefer K., Bookstein F. L., & Manning J. T. (2005). Second to fourth digit ratio and face shape. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 272, 19952001.
Galton F. (1875). The history of twins, as a criterion of the relative powers of nature and nurture. Fraser's Magazine, 12, 566576.
Kaymak B., Inanici F., Ozçakar L., Cetin A., Akinci A., & Hasçelik Z. (2008). Hand strengths in carpal tunnel syndrome. Journal of Hand Surgery, 33, 327331.
Klingenberg C. P. (2011). MorphoJ: An integrated software package for geometric morphometrics. Molecular Ecology Resources, 11, 353357.
Kulaksiz G., & Gözil R. (2002). The effect of hand preference on hand anthropometric measurements in healthy individuals. Annals of Anatomy – Anatomischer Anzeiger, 184, 257265.
Lee J.-Y., Choi J.-W., & Kim H. (2007). Determination of hand surface area by sex and body shape using alginate. Journal of Physiological Anthropology, 26, 475483.
Loehlin J. C., Medland S. E., & Martin N. G. (2009). Relative finger lengths, sex differences, and psychological traits. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 298305.
Manning J. T., Scutt D., Wilson J., & Lewis-Jones D. I. (1998). The ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length: A predictor of sperm numbers and concentrations of testosterone, luteinizing hormone and oestrogen. Human Reproduction, 13, 30003004.
Rohlf F. J. (2008a). tpsDig version 2.16. Stony Brook, NY: Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York. Accessed on 25 October, 2011. Retrieved from http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/.
Rohlf F. J. (2008b). tpsRelw version 1.46. Stony Brook, NY: Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York. Accessed on 25 October, 2011. Retrieved from http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/.
Rohlf F. J., & Slice D. (1990). Extensions of the Procrustes Method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Systematic Zoology, 39 (1), 4059.
Sanfilippo P. G., Cardini A., Hewitt A. W., Crowston J. G., & Mackey D. A. (2009). Optic disc morphology — Rethinking shape. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, 28, 227248.
Vanco C., Kasai K., Sergi R., Richards L. C., & Townsend G. C. (1995). Genetic and environmental influences on facial profile. Australian Dental Journal, 40, 104109.
Viscosi V., & Cardini A. (2011). Leaf morphology, taxonomy and geometric morphometrics: A simplified protocol for beginners. PLoS ONE, 6, e25630.
Zelditch M. L., Swiderski D. L., Sheets D. H., & Fink W. L. (2004). Geometric morphometrics for biologists. London: Academic Press.
Zheng Z., & Cohn M. J. (2011). Developmental basis of sexually dimorphic digit ratios. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 1628916294.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Twin Research and Human Genetics
  • ISSN: 1832-4274
  • EISSN: 1839-2628
  • URL: /core/journals/twin-research-and-human-genetics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 26
Total number of PDF views: 86 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 197 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 17th January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.