Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-b2xwp Total loading time: 0.435 Render date: 2022-09-26T01:27:24.614Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Article contents

Bursting Bubbles? QALYs and Discrimination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 September 2018

BEN DAVIES*
Affiliation:
The Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxfordbenjamin.davies@philosophy.ox.ac.uk

Abstract

The use of Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) in healthcare allocation has been criticized as discriminatory against people with disabilities. This article considers a response to this criticism from Nick Beckstead and Toby Ord. They say that even if QALYs are discriminatory, attempting to avoid discrimination – when coupled with other central principles that an allocation system should favour – sometimes leads to irrationality in the form of cyclic preferences. I suggest that while Beckstead and Ord have identified a problem, it is a misdiagnosis to lay it at the feet of an anti-discrimination principle. The problem in fact comes from a basic tension between respecting reasonable patient preferences and other ways of ranking treatment options. As such, adopting a QALY system does not solve the problem they identify.

Type
Reply
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Franklin, D., ‘Calibrating QALYs to Respect Equality of Persons’, Utilitas 29 (2017), pp. 6587CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 66.

2 Harris, J., ‘QALYfying the Value of Life’, Journal of Medical Ethics 13 (1987), pp. 117–23CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Menzel, P., Dolan, P. and Richardson, J., ‘The Role of Adaptation to Disability and Disease in Health State Valuation: A Preliminary Normative Analysis’, Social Science and Medicine 55 (2002), pp. 21492588CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Kamm, F., ‘Deciding Whom to Help, Health-Adjusted Life Years and Disability’, Public Health, Ethics, and Equity, ed. Anand, S., Peter, F. and Sen, A. (Oxford, 2004), pp. 225–42Google Scholar; Brock, D., ‘Cost-effectiveness and Disability Discrimination’, Economics and Philosophy 25 (2009), pp. 2747CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Persad, G., Wertheimer, A. and Emanuel, E. J., ‘Principles for Allocation of Scarce Medical Interventions’, The Lancet 373 (2009) pp. 423–31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed, at 427.

4 Harris, ‘QALYfying’, pp. 119–20.

5 Barnes, E., The Minority Body: A Theory of Disability (Oxford, 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Cubbon, J., ‘The Principle of QALY Maximisation as the Basis for Allocating Health Care Resources’, Journal of Medical Ethics 17 (1991), pp. 181–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Singer, P., McKie, J., Kuhse, H. and Richardson, J., ‘Double Jeopardy and the Use of QALYs in Healthcare Allocation’, Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (1995), pp. 144–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rawlins, M. and Dillon, A., ‘NICE Discrimination’, Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (2005), pp. 683–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

7 Beckstead, N. and Ord, T., ‘Bubbles under the Wallpaper: Healthcare Rationing and Discrimination’, Bioethics: An Anthology, 3rd edn., ed. Kuhse, H., Schüklenk, U. and Singer, P. (Oxford, 2016), pp. 406–12Google Scholar. See also Beckstead, N. and Ord, T., ‘Rationing and Rationality: The Cost of Avoiding Discrimination’, Inequalities in Health: Concepts, Measures, and Ethics, ed. Eyal, N., Hurst, S., Norheim, O. and Wikler, D. (Oxford, 2013), pp. 232–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Beckstead and Ord, ‘Bubbles’, p. 407.

9 Beckstead and Ord, ‘Bubbles’, p. 407.

10 Beckstead and Ord, ‘Bubbles’, p. 407.

11 Beckstead and Ord, ‘Bubbles’, p. 410.

12 For instance, there may be egalitarian reasons to prioritize worse-off patients. See John, T.., Millum, J. and Wasserman, D., ‘How to Allocate Scarce Health Resources without Discriminating against People with Disabilities’, Economics and Philosophy 33 (2016), pp. 161–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 167–8.

13 Beckstead and Ord, ‘Bubbles’, p. 407.

14 Beckstead and Ord, ‘Bubbles’, p. 407.

15 This aligns to some extent with public views on parents’ rights to choose substandard treatments for children, with a recent survey of public attitudes showing a majority tolerating substandard treatments that increased the risk of death by up to 5 per cent. See Nair, T., Savulescu, J., Everett, J., Tonkens, R. and Wilkinson, D.Settling for Second Best: When Should Doctors Agree to Parental Demands for Suboptimal Medical Treatment?’, Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (2017), pp. 831–40CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

16 Beckstead and Ord, ‘Bubbles’, pp. 408–9.

17 Thanks to participants in the King's College London summer seminar (2017), Dale Miller, and to two anonymous referees for feedback on this article.

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Bursting Bubbles? QALYs and Discrimination
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Bursting Bubbles? QALYs and Discrimination
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Bursting Bubbles? QALYs and Discrimination
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *