Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 6
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Chowdhury, Tamgid Ahmed and Mukhopadhaya, Pundarik 2014. Multidimensional poverty approach and development of poverty indicators: the case of Bangladesh. Contemporary South Asia, Vol. 22, Issue. 3, p. 268.

    Qizilbash, Mozaffar 2014. IDENTITY, REASON AND CHOICE. Economics and Philosophy, Vol. 30, Issue. 01, p. 11.

    Syed, Jawad and Van Buren, Harry J. 2014. Global Business Norms and Islamic Views of Women’s Employment. Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 24, Issue. 02, p. 251.

    Barr, A. and Clark, D. 2010. Do the Poor Adapt to Low Income, Minimal Education and Ill-health?. Journal of African Economies, Vol. 19, Issue. 3, p. 257.

    Clark, David A. 2009. Adaptation, Poverty and Well‐Being: Some Issues and Observations with Special Reference to the Capability Approach and Development Studies1. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Vol. 10, Issue. 1, p. 21.

    Davies, Bleddyn 2007. Social Planning: Classics in Planning I - Edited by Jessie P. H. Poon, Kenneth Button and Peter Nijkamp. Social Policy & Administration, Vol. 41, Issue. 5, p. 525.


Capability, Happiness and Adaptation in Sen and J. S. Mill

  • DOI:
  • Published online: 16 February 2006

While there is much common ground between the writings of Amartya Sen and John Stuart Mill – particularly in their advocacy of freedom and gender equality – one is a critic, while the other is an advocate, of utilitarianism. In spite of this contrast, there are strong echoes of Sen's capability approach in Mill's writings. Inasmuch as Mill sees the capability to be happy as important he holds a form of capability approach. He also thinks of happiness as constituted by the exercise of certain capabilities (including the higher faculties). Furthermore, Mill addresses the possibility that people can adapt to limited opportunity, which is central to Sen's critique of some ‘utility’-based views. By contrasting contentment and happiness Mill suggests one way in which a utilitarian might address cases of adaptation. His discussions of capabilities and of adaptation are consistent with his utilitarianism.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

  • ISSN: 0953-8208
  • EISSN: 1741-6183
  • URL: /core/journals/utilitas
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *