Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 2
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Moen, Ole Martin 2013. The Unity and Commensurability of Pleasures and Pains. Philosophia, Vol. 41, Issue. 2, p. 527.


    LABUKT, IVAR 2012. Hedonic Tone and the Heterogeneity of Pleasure. Utilitas, Vol. 24, Issue. 02, p. 172.


    ×

The Nature of Pleasure: A Critique of Feldman

  • ELINOR MASON (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0953820807002646
  • Published online: 01 September 2007
Abstract

In these remarks on Feldman's recent book, Pleasure and the Good Life, I concentrate on Feldman's account of pleasure as attitudinal. I argue that an account of pleasure according to which pleasure need not have any feel is implausible. I suggest that Feldman could avoid this problem but retain the advantages of his attitudinal hedonism by giving an account of the attitude ‘taking pleasure in’ such that the attitude has a feel.

Copyright
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Utilitas
  • ISSN: 0953-8208
  • EISSN: 1741-6183
  • URL: /core/journals/utilitas
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×