Skip to main content
×
Home

“NEUTRAL PHYSIOGNOMY”: THE UNREADABLE FACES OF MIDDLEMARCH

  • Josh Epstein (a1)
Abstract

Mr. Brooke himself has already been described by the narrator as having a “neutral physiognomy,” and that neutrality itself identified as one of few “striking points in his appearance” (503). Part of the effigy's menace, clearly, is its uncanny similarity to the original. As described, however, the effigy is unlikely to be a piece of skilled imitative craftsmanship; indeed, it is the very shoddiness of the thing that makes it eerie. Unlike the banality and apparent harmlessness of this vaguely empty caricature, a rag-doll in waistcoat and monocle, the “parrot-like, Punch-voiced echo of [Mr. Brooke's] words” threatens because it offers no legible meaning, instead forcing interpretive agency onto the reader. Indeed, the “neutral physiognomy” must foreground interpretive agency, otherwise it would be impossible for a non-trait such as neutrality, either in Brooke or in his effigy, to be a “striking point” at all.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Beer Gillian. Darwin's Plots: Evolutionary Narrative in Darwin, George Eliot and Nineteenth-Century Fiction. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2000.
Berland K. J. H.Reading Character in the Face: Lavater, Socrates, and Physiognomy.” Word and Image 9.3 (1993): 252–69.
Butler Judith. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge, 1999.
Darwin Charles. The Autobiography of Charles Darwin, 1809–1882. Ed. Barlow Nora. London: Harcourt, 1958.
Deresiewicz William. “Heroism and Organicism in the Case of Lydgate.” Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900 38.4 (1998): 723–40.
Derrida Jacques. “Living On.” Trans. James Hulbert. Deconstruction and Criticism. New York: Seabury, 1979. 75176.
Dever Carolyn. Death and the Mother from Dickens to Freud. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1998.
Easley Alexis. “Authorship, Gender, and Identity: George Eliot in the 1850s.” Women's Writing: The Elizabethan to the Victorian Period 3.2 (1996): 145–60.
Elam Diane. Feminism and Deconstruction: Ms. en Abyme. New York: Routledge, 1994.
Eliot George. Daniel Deronda. 1876. London: Penguin, 1995.
Eliot George. Middlemarch. 1872. London: Penguin, 1994.
Gilbert Sandra, and Gubar Susan. The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Imagination. 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale UP, 2000.
Ginsburg Michal Peled. “Pseudonym, Epigraphs, and Narrative Voice: Middlemarch and the Problem of Authorship.” ELH 47.3 (1980): 542–58.
Graham John. “Lavater's Physiognomy in England.” Journal of the History of Ideas 22.4 (1961): 561–72.
Hartley Lucy. Physiognomy and the Meaning of Expression in Nineteenth-Century Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2001.
Hertz Neil. George Eliot's Pulse. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2003.
Irigaray Luce. “This Sex Which Is Not One.” Trans. Claudia Reeder. New French Feminisms: An Anthology. Ed. Marks Elaine and Courtivron Isabelle de. Amherst: U of Massachusetts P, 1980. 99110.
Irigaray Luce. To Speak Is Never Neutral. 1985. Trans. Gail Schwab. New York: Routledge, 2002.
Johnson Patricia E. “The Gendered Politics of the Gaze: Henry James and George Eliot.” Mosaic: A Journal for the Interdisciplinary Study of Literature 30.1 (1997): 3954.
Lavater Johann Caspar. Essays on Physiognomy; for the Promotion of the Knowledge and the Love of Mankind. 1789. Trans. Thomas Holcroft. Boston, 1794. Early American Imprints, Series I: Evans. Vanderbilt U., Nashville. 10 May 2005<http://infoweb.newsbank.com.proxy.library.vanderbilt.edu/>.
Lavater Johann Caspar. Essays on Physiognomy. 4th ed. London, 1844. Digital Lavater. Ed. Ross Woodrow. U. of Newcastle. 2002. 12 May 2005<http://www.newcastle.edu.au/discipline/fine-art/pubs/lavater>.
Logan Peter M.“Conceiving the Body in Middlemarch.” History of the Human Sciences 4.2 (1991): 197222.
Mason Michael York. Middlemarch and Science: Problems of Life and Mind.” The Review of English Studies 22.86 (1971): 151–69.
Menke Richard. “Fiction as Vivisection: G. H. Lewes and George Eliot.” ELH 67.2 (2000): 617–53.
Miller J. Hillis. “Narrative and History.” ELH 41.3 (1974): 455–73.
Miller J. Hillis. “Optic and Semiotic in Middlemarch.” The Worlds of Victorian Fiction. Ed. Buckley Jerome H.. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1975. 125–48.
Nardo Anna K. George Eliot's Dialogue with John Milton. Columbia: U of Missouri P, 2003.
Phelan Peggy. Unmarked: The Politics of Performance. New York: Routledge, 1993.
Postlethwaite Diana. “When George Eliot Reads Milton: The Muse in a Different Voice.” ELH 57.1 (1990): 197221.
Rischin Abigail S.“Beside the Reclining Statue: Ekphrasis, Narrative, and Desire in Middlemarch.” PMLA 111 (1996): 1121–32.
Rivers Christopher. Face Value: Physiognomical Thought and the Legible Body in Marivaux, Lavater, Balzac, Gautier, and Zola. Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 1994
Shakespeare William. The Complete Works of Shakespeare. Ed. Bevington David. 4th ed. New York: Harper Collins, 1992.
Shookman Ellis. “Pseudo-Science, Social Fad, Literary Wonder: Johann Caspar Lavater and the Art of Physiognomy.” The Faces of Physiognomy: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Johann Caspar Lavater. Ed. Shookman . Columbia: Camden House, 1993. 124.
Shuttleworth Sally. George Eliot and Nineteenth-Century Science: The Make-Believe of a Beginning. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1984.
Tytler Graeme. “‘The Lines and Lights of the Human Countenance’: Physiognomy in George Eliot's Fiction.” George Eliot-George Henry Lewes Studies 36–37 (1999): 2958.
Tytler Graeme. Physiognomy in the European Novel: Faces and Fortunes. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1982.
Wright T. R.From Bumps to Morals: The Phrenological Background to George Eliot's Moral Framework.” Review of English Studies 33.129 (1982): 3446.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Victorian Literature and Culture
  • ISSN: 1060-1503
  • EISSN: 1470-1553
  • URL: /core/journals/victorian-literature-and-culture
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 41 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 196 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.