Afifi, M, Swanton, CJ (2011) Maize seed and stem roots differ in response to neighbouring weeds. Weed Res.
51:442–450
Afifi, M, Swanton, CJ (2012) Early physiological mechanisms of weed competition. Weed Sci.
60:542–551
Araus, JL, Serret, MD, Edmeades, GO (2012) Phenotyping maize for adaptation to drought. Front Physiol.
3: (Article 305), 1–20
Bassetti, P, Westgate, ME (1993) Emergence, elongation, and senescence of maize silks. Crop Sci.
33:271–275
Bassetti, P, Westgate, ME (1994) Floral asynchrony and kernel set in maize quantified by image analysis. Agron J.
86:699–703
Bolaños, J, Edmeades, GO (1993) Eight cycles of selection for drought tolerance in lowland tropical maize. II. Responses in reproductive behavior. Field Crops Res.
31:253–268
Bolaños, J, Edmeades, GO (1996) The importance of the anthesis-silking interval in breeding for drought tolerance in tropical maize. Field Crops Res.
48:65–80
Borrás, L, Otegui, ME (2001) Maize kernel wt response to post flowering source–sink ratio. Crop Sci.
49:1816–1822
Borrás, L, Slafer, GA, Otegui, ME (2004) Seed dry wt response to source–sink manipulations in wheat, maize and soybean: a quantitative reappraisal. Field Crops Res.
86:131–146
Bosnić, A, Swanton, CJ (1997) Influence of barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) time of emergence and density on corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci.
45:276–282
Bruce, WB, Edmeades, GO, Barker, TC (2002) Molecular and physiological approaches to maize improvement for drought tolerance. J Exp Biol.
53:366 13–25
Buren, LL, Mock, JJ, Anderson, IC (1974) Morphological and physiological traits in maize associated with tolerance to high plant density. Crop Sci.
14:426–429
Campbell, GS, Norman, JM (1998) An introduction to environmental biophysics. New York
Springer-Verlag. Pp 28–34
Campos, H, Cooper, M, Habben, JE, Edmeades, GO, Schussler, JR (2004) Improving drought tolerance in maize: a view from industry. Field Crops Res.
90:19–34
Carcova, J, Andrieu, B, Otegui, ME (2003) Silk Elongation in Maize: Relationship with Flower Development and Pollination. Crop Sci.
43:914–920
Cerrudo, D, Page, ER, Tollenaar, M, Stewart, G, Swanton, CJ (2012) Mechanisms of yield loss in maize caused by weed competition. Weed Sci.
60:225–232
Cox, WJ, Hahn, RR, Stachowski, PJ (2006) Time of weed removal with glyphosate affects corn growth and yield components. Agron J.
98:349–353
Daynard, TB, Tanner, JW, Duncan, WG (1971) Duration of the grain filling period and its relation to grain yield in corn (Zea mays L.). Crop Sci.
11:45–48
Dow, EW, Daynard, TB, Muldoon, JF, Major, DJ, Thurtell, GW (1984) Resistance to drought and density stress in Canadian and European maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids. Can J Plant Sci.
64:575–585
Duvick, DN (1996) Review of the symposium on developing drought and low N tolerant maize. Pages 554–556
in
Developing Drought- and Low N-Tolerant Maize, Proceedings of a Symposium. El Batán, Mexico
CIMMYT
Edmeades, GO (1976) Aspects of plant-to-plant variability in maize (Zea mays L.). Ph.D Dissertation. Ontario, Canada
University of Guelph. 174 p
Edmeades, GO, Bolaños, J, Chapman, SC, Lafitte, HR, Bänziger, M (1999) Selection improves drought tolerance in tropical maize populations: I. Gains in biomass, grain yield, and harvest index. Crop Sci.
39:1306–1315
Edmeades, GO, Bolaños, J, Hernandez, M, Bello, S (1993) Causes for silk delay in a lowland tropical maize. Crop Sci.
33:1029–1035
Edmeades, GO, Daynard, TB (1979) The development of plant to plant variability in maize at different planting densities. Can J Plant Sci.
59:561–576
Evans, SP, Knezevic, SZ, Lindquist, JL, Shapiro, CA, Blankenship, EE (2003) Nitrogen application influences the critical period for weed control in corn. Weed Sci.
51:408–417
Fickett, ND, Boerboom, CM, Stoltenberg, DE (2013) Predicted corn yield loss due to weed competition prior to postemergence herbicide application on Wisconsin farms. Weed Tech.
27:54–62
Fuad-Hassan, A, Tardieu, F, Turc, O (2008) Drought-induced changes in anthesis-silking interval are related to silk expansion: a spatio-temporal growth analysis in maize plants subjected to soil water deficit. Plant Cell Environ.
31:1349–1360
Glenn, FB, Daynard, TB (1974) Effects of genotype, planting pattern, and plant density onplant-to-plant variability and grain yield corn. Can J Plant Sci.
54:323–330
Hall, MR, Swanton, CJ, Anderson, GW (1992) The critical period of weed control in grain corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci.
40:441–447
Jacobs, BC, Pearson, CJ (1991) Potential yield of maize, determined by rates of growth and development of ears. Field Crops Res.
27:281–298
Kiniry, JR, Wood, CA, Spanel, DA, Bockholt, AJ (1990) Seed wt response to decreased seed number in maize. Agron J.
54:98–102
Knezevic, SF, Weise, SF, Swanton, CJ (1994) Interference of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) in corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci.
42:568–573
Kropff, MJ, Spitters, CJT (1991) A simple model of crop loss by weed competition from early observations on relative leaf area of the weeds. Weed Res.
31:97–105
Lafitte, HR, Edmeades, GO (1994) Improvement for tolerance to low soil nitrogen in tropical maize I. Selection criteria. Field Crops Res.
39:1–14
Lejeune, P, Bernier, G (1996) Effect of environment on the early steps of ear initiation in maize (Zea mays L.). Plant Cell Environ.
19:217–224
Lemcoff, JH, Loomis, RS (1986) Nitrogen influences on yield determination in maize. Crop Sci.
26:1017–1022
Liu, JG, Mahoney, KJ, Sikkema, PH, Swanton, CJ (2009) The importance of light quality in crop–weed competition. Weed Res.
49:217–224
McCully, ME (1999) Roots in soil: unearthing the complexities of roots and their rhizospheres. Ann Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol.
50:695–718
Monneveux, P, Zaidi, PH, Sanchez, C (2005) Population density and low nitrogen affects yield-associated traits in tropical maize. Crop Sci.
45:535–545
Moriles, J, Hansen, S, Horvath, DP, Reicks, G, Clay, DE, Clay, SA (2012) Microarray and Growth Analyses Identify Differences and Similarities of Early Corn Response to Weeds, Shade, and Nitrogen Stress. Weed Sci.
60:158–166
Padilla, JM, Otegui, ME (2005) Co-ordination between leaf initiation and leaf appearance in field-grown maize (Zea mays): genotypic differences in response of rates to temperature. Ann Bot.
96:997–1007
Page, ER, Cerrudo, D, Westra, P, Loux, M, Smith, K, Foresman, C, Wright, H, Swanton, CJ (2012) Why early season weed control is important in maize. Weed Sci.
60:423–430
Page, ER, Tollenaar, M, Lee, EA, Lukens, L, Swanton, CJ (2009) Does the shade avoidance response contribute to the critical period for weed control in maize (Zea mays)?
Weed Res.
49:563–571
Parry, MAJ, Flexas, J, Medrano, H (2005) Prospects for crop production under drought: research priorities and future directions. Ann Appl Biol.
147:211–226
Passioura, JB (1996) Drought and drought tolerance. Plant Growth Regul.
20:79–83
Ribaut, J, Betran, J, Monneveux, P, Setter, T (2009) Drought tolerance in maize. Pages 311–344
in
Bennetzen, JL and Hake, SC, eds. Handbook of Maize: Its Biology. New York
Springer
Reid, A (2013) Timing of weed control influences the anthesis-silking interval in maize. . University of Guelph. 57 p
Ritchie, SW, Hanway, JJ, Benson, GO (1992) How a corn plant grows. Iowa State Univ Sci Tech Coop Ext Serv Rep.
48
Swanton, CJ, Mahoney, KJ, Chandler, K, Gulden, RH (2008) Integrated weed management: knowledge-based weed management systems. Weed Sci.
56:168–172
Tollenaar, M (1977) Sink–source relationships during reproductive development in maize. A review. Maydica.
22:49–75
Tollenaar, M, Aguilera, A, Nissanka, SP (1997) Grain Yield is Reduced More by Weed Interference in an Old than in a New Maize Hybrid. Agron J.
89:239–246
Tollenaar, M, Daynard, TB, Hunter, RB (1979) Effect of temperature on rate of leaf appearance and flowering date in maize. Crop Sci.
19:363–366
Tollenaar, M, Lee, EA (2006) Dissection of physiological processes underlying grain yield in maize by examining genetic improvement and heterosis. Maydica.
51:399–408
Vega, CRC, Andrade, FH, Sadras, VO (2001) Reproductive partitioning and seed set efficiency in soybean, sunflower and maize. Field Crops Res.
72:163–175
Weiner, J (1990) Asymmetric competition in plant populations. Trends Ecol Evol.
5:360–364
