Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T00:29:52.964Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Herbicide Cross-Resistance in Triazine-Resistant Biotypes of Four Species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

E. Patrick Fuerst
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop and Soil Sci., Pestic. Res. Ctr., Michigan State Univ., E. Lansing, MI 48824
Charles J. Arntzen
Affiliation:
Dep. Biochem., D.O.E. Plant Res. Lab., Michigan State Univ., E. Lansing, MI 48824
Klaus Pfister
Affiliation:
Dep. Biochem., D.O.E. Plant Res. Lab., Michigan State Univ., E. Lansing, MI 48824
Donald Penner
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop and Soil Sci., Pestic. Res. Ctr., Michigan State Univ., E. Lansing, MI 48824

Abstract

The cross-resistance of triazine-resistant biotypes of smooth pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus L. # AMACH), common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L. # CHEAL), common groundsel (Senecio vulgaris L. # SENVU), and the crop canola (Brassica napus L. var. Atratower) to a selection of herbicides was evaluated at both the whole plant and chloroplast level. The triazine-resistant biotypes of all four species showed a similar pattern of cross-resistance, suggesting that a similar mutation had occurred in each species. The four triazine-resistant biotypes were resistant to injury from atrazine [6-chloro-N-ethyl-N′-(1-methylethyl)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine], bromacil [5-bromo-6-methyl-3-(1-methylpropyl)-2,4-(1H,3H)pyrimidinedione], and pyrazon [5-amino-4-chloro-2-phenyl-3(2H)-pyridazinone] and were slightly resistant to buthidazole {3-[5-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl]-4-hydroxy-1-methyl-2-imidazolidinone}. The triazine-resistant biotypes were more sensitive to dinoseb [2-(1-methylpropyl)-4,6-dinitrophenol]. Triazine-resistant smooth pigweed showed resistance to cyanazine {2-[[4-chloro-6-(ethylamino)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl] amino]-2-methylpropanenitrile} and metribuzin [4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(methylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5(4H)-one] with slight resistance to linuron [N′-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-N-methoxy-N-methylurea] and desmedipham {ethyl [3-[[(phenylamino)carbony] oxy] phenyl] carbamate}. There was little or no resistance to diuron [N′-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-N,N-dimethylurea], bromoxynil (3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitrile), bentazon [3-(1-methylethyl)-(1H)-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxide], or dicamba (3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acid). Parallel studies at the chloroplast level indicated that the degree of resistance to inhibition of photosynthetic electron transport was highly correlated with the degree of resistance to herbicidal injury. This correlation indicates that atrazine, cyanazine, metribuzin, pyrazon, bromacil, linuron, desmedipham, and buthidazole cause plant injury by inhibition of photosynthesis. This correlation also indicates that triazine resistance and cross-resistance at the whole plant level is due to decreased sensitivity at the level of photosynthetic electron transport. Cross-resistance to numerous additional herbicides was evaluated on isolated chloroplast thylakoid membranes and these results are discussed. 14C-atrazine was displaced from thylakoid membranes by several herbicides, indicating that these herbicides compete for a common binding site.

Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ahrens, W. H. and Stoller, E. W. 1983. Competition, growth rate, and CO2 fixation in triazine-susceptible and -resistant smooth pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus). Weed Sci. 31:438444.Google Scholar
2. Arntzen, C. J., Ditto, C. L., and Brewer, P. E. 1979. Chloroplast membrane alterations in triazine resistant Amaranthus retroflexus biotypes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 76:278282.Google Scholar
3. Arntzen, C. J., Pfister, K., and Steinback, K. E. 1982. The mechanism of chloroplast triazine resistance: Alterations in the site of herbicide action. Pages 185214 in LeBaron, H. M. and Gressel, J., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
4. Ashton, F. M. and Crafts, A. S. 1981. Mode of action of herbicides. 2nd. ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
5. Bartels, P. G. and Watson, C. W. 1978. Inhibition of carotenoid biosynthesis by fluridone and norflurazon. Weed Sci. 26:198203.Google Scholar
6. Boger, P. 1981. Resistance against herbicides inhibiting photosynthesis. Plant Res. Devel. 13:4051.Google Scholar
7. Brewer, P. E., Arntzen, C. J., and Slife, F. W. 1979. Effects of atrazine, cyanazine, and procyazine on the photochemical reactions of isolated chloroplasts. Weed Sci. 27:300308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Brown, A.W.A. 1971. Pest resistance in pesticides. Pages 457552 in White-Stevens, R., ed. Pesticides in the Environment. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
9. Burke, J. J., Wilson, R. F., and Swafford, J. R. 1982. Characterization of chloroplasts isolated from triazine-susceptible and triazine-resistant biotypes of Brassica campestris L. Plant Physiol. 70:2429.Google Scholar
10. Dekker, J. 1976. Acquired resistance to fungicides. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 14:405428.Google Scholar
11. Ducruet, J. M. and DePrado, R. 1982. Comparison of inhibitory activity of amides derivatives in triazine-resistant and -susceptible chloroplasts from Chenopodium album and Brassica campestris . Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 18:253261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Eshel, Y. 1969. Effect of pyrazon on photosynthesis of various plant species. Weed Res. 9:167172.Google Scholar
13. Finney, D. J. 1979. Bioassay and the practice of statistical inference. Int. Stat. Rev. 47:112.Google Scholar
14. Fuerst, E. P., Barrett, M., and Penner, D. 1985. Control of triazine-resistant common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) and two pigweed species (Amaranthus spp.) in corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 34:440443.Google Scholar
15. Fuerst, E. P., Penner, D., and Arntzen, C. J. 1983. Relationship of carbohydrate levels to dinoseb tolerance in two Amaranthus hybridus biotypes. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 38: 4647.Google Scholar
16. Galloway, R. E. and Mets, L. J. 1984. Atrazine, bromacil, and diuron resistance in Chlamydamonas. A single non-Mendelian genetic locus controls the structure of the thylakoid binding site. Plant Physiol. 74:469474.Google Scholar
17. Hilton, J. L., Scharen, A. L., St. John, J. B., Moreland, D. E., and Norris, K. H. 1969. Modes of action of pyridazinone herbicides. Weed Sci. 17:541547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Hilton, J. L., Monaco, T. J., Moreland, D. E., and Gentner, W. A. 1964. Mode of action of substituted uracil herbicides. Weeds 12:129131.Google Scholar
19. Hirschberg, J. and McIntosh, L. 1983. Molecular basis of herbicide resistance in Amaranthus hybridus . Science 222:13461349.Google Scholar
20. Holt, J. S., Stemler, A. J., and Radosevich, S. R. 1981. Differential light responses of photosynthesis by triazine-resistant and triazine-susceptible Senecio vulgaris biotypes. Plant Physiol. 67:744748.Google Scholar
21. Izawa, S. 1977. Inhibitors of electron transport. Pages 266282 in Trebst, A. and Avron, M., eds. Photosynthesis. I. Photosynthetic Electron Transport and Photophosphorylation. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
22. Janatkova, H. and Wildner, G. F. 1982. Isolation and characterization of metribuzin-resistant Chlamydomonas reinhardii cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 682:227233.Google Scholar
23. Lavel-Martin, D., Grizeau, D., and Calvayrac, R. 1983. Characterization of diuron-resistant Euglena: greater tolerance for various phenylurea herbicides and increased sensitivity of thylalkoids to ethyl-s-dipropyl thiocarbamate. Plant Sci. Lett. 29: 155167.Google Scholar
24. MacKinney, G. 1941. Absorption of light by chlorophyll solutions. J. Biol. Chem. 140:315322.Google Scholar
25. Matoo, A. K., St. John, J. B., and Wergin, W. P. 1984. Adaptive reorganization of protein and lipid components in chloroplast membranes as associated with herbicide binding. J. Cell Biochem. 24:163175.Google Scholar
26. Moreland, D. E. 1980. Mechanism of action of herbicides. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 31:597638.Google Scholar
27. Oettmeier, W., Masson, K., Fedtke, C., Konze, J., and Schmidt, R. R. 1982. Effect of photosystem II inhibitors on chloroplasts isolated from species either susceptible or resistant towards s-triazine herbicides. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 18:357367.Google Scholar
28. Ort, D. R., Ahrens, W. H., Martin, B., and Stoller, E. W. 1983. Comparison of photosynthetic performance in triazine-resistant and susceptible biotypes of Amaranthus hybridus . Plant Physiol. 72:925930.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29. Paterson, D. R. and Arntzen, C. J. 1982. Detection of altered inhibition of photosystem II reactions in herbicide resistant mutants. Pages 109118 in Edelman, M., Hallick, R. B., and Chua, N. H., eds. Methods in Chloroplast Molecular Biology. Elsevier Biomedical Press, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
30. Pfister, K. and Arntzen, C. J. 1979. The mode of action of photosystem II-specific inhibitors in herbicide-resistant weed biotypes. Z. Naturforsch. 34c:9961009.Google Scholar
31. Pfister, K., Radosevich, S. R., and Arntzen, C. J. 1979. Modification of herbicide binding to photosystem II in two biotypes of Senecio vulgaris L. Plant Physiol. 64:995999.Google Scholar
32. Pfister, K., Steinback, K. E., Gardner, G., and Arntzen, C. J. 1981. Photoaffinity labelling of an herbicide receptor protein in chloroplast membranes. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78:981985.Google Scholar
33. Pillai, P. and St. John, J. B. 1981. Lipid composition of chloroplast membranes from weed biotypes differentially sensitive to triazine herbicides. Plant Physiol. 68:585587.Google Scholar
34. Radosevich, S. R., Steinback, K. E., and Arntzen, C. J. 1979. Effect of photosystem II inhibitors on thylakoid membranes of two common groundsel (Senecio vulgaris) biotypes. Weed Sci. 27:216218.Google Scholar
35. Ryan, G. F. 1970. Resistance of common groundsel to simazine and atrazine. Weed Sci. 18:614616.Google Scholar
36. Shimabukuro, R. H., Frear, D. S., Swanson, H. R., and Walsh, W. C. 1971. Glutathione combination. An enzymatic basis for atrazine resistance in corn. Plant Physiol. 47:1014.Google Scholar
37. Shimabukuro, R. H., Swanson, H. R., and Walsh, W. C. 1970. Glutathione conjugation. Atrazine detoxication mechanism in corn. Plant Physiol. 46:103107.Google Scholar
38. Steinback, K. E., Pfister, K., and Arntzen, C. J. 1981. Trypsinmediated removal of herbicide binding site within the photosystem II complex. Z. Naturforsch. 36c:98108.Google Scholar
39. Suwanketnikom, R., Hatzios, K. K., Penner, D., and Bell, D. 1982. The site of electron transport inhibition by bentazon [3 isopropyl-1H-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-(4)3H-one-2,2-dioxide] in isolated chloroplasts. Can. J. Bot. 60:409412.Google Scholar
40. Tellenbach, M., Gerber, A., and Boschetti, A. 1983. Herbicide binding to thylakoid membranes of DCMU-resistant mutant of Chlamydomonas reinhardii . FEBS Lett. 158:147150.Google Scholar
41. Tischer, W. and Strotmann, H. 1977. Relationship between inhibitor binding to chloroplasts and inhibition of photosynthetic electron transport. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 460:113125.Google Scholar
42. Valsberg, A. J. and Schiff, J. A. 1976. Events surrounding the early development of Euglena chloroplasts. 7. Inhibition of carotenoid biosynthesis by the herbicide SAN 9789 (4-chloro-5-(methylamino)-2-(α,α,α-trifluoro-m-tolyl)-3(2H)pyridazinone) and its developmental consequences. Plant Physiol. 57:260269.Google Scholar
43. Van Tuyl, J. M. 1977. Genetics of fungal resistance to systemic fungicides. Medel. Landbouwhogesch., Wageningen 77–2:1136.Google Scholar
44. Vaughn, K. C. and Duke, S. O. 1984. Ultrastructural alterations to chloroplasts in triazine-resistant weed biotypes. Physiol. Plant. 62:510520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
45. Weed Science Society of America. 1983. Herbicide Handbook. 5th ed. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
46. York, A. C., Arntzen, C. J., and Slife, F. W. 1981. Photosynthetic electron transport inhibition by buthidazole. Weed Sci. 29:5964.Google Scholar