Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T16:44:33.360Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of tillage and Triticum aestivum cover crop on herbicide efficacy in Oryza sativa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David L. Jordan ,
Patrick K. Bollich ,
Michael P. Braverman  and
Dearl E. Sanders
Patrick K. Bollich
Affiliation:
Rice Research Station, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, P.O. Box 1429, Crowley, LA 70527
Michael P. Braverman
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology and Crop Physiology, 302 Life Sciences Building, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Dearl E. Sanders
Affiliation:
Louisiana Cooperative Extension Service, 261 Knapp Hall, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Field experiments were conducted from 1994 through 1996 in dry-seeded and water-seeded Oryza sativa to compare weed control and O. sativa yield in conventional tillage and reduced tillage (stale seedbed and Triticum aestivum cover crop) systems with no in-season herbicide, propanil applied early postemergence (EPOST), and propanil EPOST followed by propanil plus molinate (dry-seeded production) or granular molinate (water-seeded production). The T. aestivum cover crop reduced Echinochloa crus-galli, Heteranthera limosa, Ammania coccinea, and Cyperus esculentus infestation and reduced the need for in-season herbicides in some but not all experiments. Oryza sativa grain yield was affected by both tillage systems and herbicide programs; however, these treatment factors influenced yield independently. Increasing the number of in-season herbicide applications increased weed control and O. sativa yield in some but not all experiments.

Keywords

MolinateEchinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv. ECHCG, barnyardgrassHeteranthera limosa (L.) Willd. HETLI, ducksaladAmmania coccinea Rottb. AMMCO, purple ammaniaCyperus esculentus L. CYPES, yellow nutsedgeOryza sativa L. ‘Cypress,’ riceTriticum aestivum L., wheatAllelopathyweed managementAMMCOCYPESECHCGHETLI
Type
Weed Management
Information
Weed Science , Volume 47 , Issue 3 , June 1999 , pp. 332 - 337
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Current address: EPL Bio Analytical Services, P.O. Box 771084, Winter Garden, FL 34777

References

Literature Cited

Barghassa, P., Hons, F. M., and Turner, F. T. 1994. Ammonia volitilization in minimum tillage rice production. Proc. Rice Tech. Work. Group 25:146–147.Google Scholar
Bollich, P. K. and Feagley, S. E. 1994. Characterization of drainage water from four water-seeded rice management systems. Proc. Rice Tech. Work. Group 25:36.Google Scholar
Bryson, C. T. 1996. Purple nutsedge control in reduced tillage cotton. Page 1564 in Dugger, P. and Richter, D. A., eds. 1996 Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference, January 9–12, 1996, Nashville, TN. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council of America.Google Scholar
Bryson, C. T. and Smeda, R. J. 1995. Cover crop residues for weed control in cotton. Page 617 in Richter, D. A. and Armour, J., eds. 1996 Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference, January 4–7, 1995, San Antonio, TX. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council of America.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D. 1992. Population dynamics and control of annual weeds in corn (Zea mays) as influenced by tillage system. Weed Sci. 40:241–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhler, D. D. and Daniel, T. C. 1988. Influence of tillage systems on giant foxtail, Setaria faberi, and velvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti, density and control in corn. Weed Sci. 36:642–647.Google Scholar
Burgos, N. R. and Talbert, R. E. 1996. Weed control and sweet corn (Zea mays var. rugosa) response to a no-till system with cover crops. Weed Sci. 44:355–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartwright, R. D., Lee, F. N., Eason, R., Cripper, D. L., and Templeton, G. E. 1995. Effect of reduced tillage practices on stem and sheath diseases of rice in Arkansas. Page 108–114 in Wells, B. R., ed. Arkansas Rice Research Studies 1994. Fayetteville, AR: Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Ser. 446.Google Scholar
Egley, G. H. and Williams, R. D. 1990. Decline of weed seeds and seedling emergence over five years as affected by soil disturbance. Weed Sci. 38:504–510.Google Scholar
Fink, R. J. and Wesley, D. 1974. Corn yield as affected by fertilization and tillage system. Agron. J. 66:70–71.Google Scholar
Groth, D. E. and Sanders, D. E. 1996. Cause of the delayed phytotoxicity syndrome in rice. Proc. Louisiana Plant Prot. Assoc. 6:22.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. C. III and Mullinix, B. G. Jr. 1995. Weed management in peanut using stale seedbed techniques. Weed Sci. 43:293–297.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L. and Sanders, D. E. 1999. Weed management. Pages 37–50 in Hollier, C. A., ed. Louisiana Rice Production Manual. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Agricultual Center, Louisiana State University Pub. 2321. 116 pp.Google Scholar
Lavy, T. L., Dewell, R. A., Beard, C. R., Mattice, J. D., and Skulman, B. W. 1995. Environmental implications of pesticides in rice production. Pages 52–59 in Wells, B. R., ed. Arkansas Rice Research Studies 1994. Fayetteville, AR: Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Series 446.Google Scholar
Leonard, B. R. and Huthinson, R. L. 1995. Effects of tillage systems on selected insect pests in southern row crops. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 48:71–72.Google Scholar
Nelson, L. R., Gallaher, R. N., Bruce, R. R., and Holmes, M. R. 1977. Production of corn and sorghum grain in double-cropping systems. Agron. J. 69:41–45.Google Scholar
Sanders, D. E., Groth, D. E., and Strahan, R. E. 1996. Rice injury and injury prevention resulting from interactions between soil borne fungi and selected herbicides and fungicides. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 49:44.Google Scholar
Sanford, J. O., Myhre, D. L., and Merwine, N. C. 1973. Double cropping systems involving no-tillage and conventional tillage. Agron. J. 65:978–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, D. R. 1996. Development of stale seedbed weed control programs for southern row crops. Weed Sci. 44:413–416.Google Scholar
Sholar, J. R., Mozingo, R. W., and Beasley, J. P. Jr. 1995. Peanut cultural practices. Pages 354–382 in Pattee, H. E. and Stalker, H. T., eds. Advances in Peanut Science. Stillwater, OK: American Peanut Research and Education Society.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J. Jr. 1993. Conservation tillage systems and stale seedbed production in rice in Arkansas. Pages 51–57 in Wells, B. R., ed. Arkansas Rice Research Studies 1992. Fayetteville, AR: Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Ser. 431.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J. Jr., Baltazar, A. M., and Nastasi, P. 1993. Conservation tillage systems and stale seedbed practices in rice and soybean in Arkansas. Pages 77–84 in McClelland, M. R., Keisling, T. C., and Frans, R. E., eds. Conservation Technology in Arkansas Agriculture 1992. Fayetteville, AR: Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Ser. 432.Google Scholar
Webster, T. M., Cardina, J., and Norquay, H. M. 1998. Tillage and seed depth affects on velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) emergence. Weed Sci. 46:76–82.Google Scholar
Worsham, A. D. 1991. Allelopathic cover crops reduce herbicide input. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 44:69.Google Scholar
Yenish, J. P., Worsham, A. D., and York, A. C. 1996. Cover crops for herbicide replacement on no-tillage corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 10:815–821.Google Scholar
Zadasa, I. A., Linker, H. M., and Coble, H. D. 1997. Initial weed densities affect weed management with a rye (Secale cereale) cover crop. Weed Technol. 11:473–477.Google Scholar