Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Investigating the Human Dimension of Weed Management: New Tools of the Trade

  • Doug Doohan (a1), Robyn Wilson (a2), Elizabeth Canales (a1) and Jason Parker (a1)
Abstract

The human dimension of weed management is most evident when farmers make decisions contrary to science-based recommendations. Why do farmers resist adopting practices that will delay herbicide resistance, or seem to ignore new weed species or biotypes until it is too late? Weed scientists for the most part have ignored such questions or considered them beyond their domain and expertise, continuing to focus instead on fundamental weed science and technology. Recent pressing concerns about widespread failure of herbicide-based weed management and acceptability of emerging technologies necessitates a closer look at farmer decision making and the role of weed scientists in that process. Here we present a circular risk-analysis framework characterized by regular interaction with and input from farmers to inform both research and on-farm risk-management decisions. The framework utilizes mental models to probe the deeply held beliefs of farmers regarding weeds and weed management. A mental model is a complex, often hidden web of perceptions and attitudes that govern how we understand and respond to the world. One's mental model may limit ability to develop new insights and adopt new ways of management, and is best assessed through structured, open-ended interviews that enable the investigator to exhaust the subjects inherent to a particular risk. Our assessment of farmer mental models demonstrated the fundamental attribution error whereby farmers attributed problems with weed management primarily to factors outside of their control, such as uncontrolled weed growth on neighboring properties and environmental factors. Farmers also identified specific processes that contribute to weed problems that were not identified by experts; specifically, the importance of floods and faulty herbicide applications in the spread of weeds. Conventional farmers expressed an overwhelming preference for controlling weeds with herbicides, a preference that was reinforced by their extreme dislike for weeds. These preferences reflect a typical inverse relationship between perceived risk and benefit, where an activity or entity we perceive as beneficial is by default perceived as low risk. This preference diminishes the ability of farmers to appreciate the risks associated with overreliance on herbicides. Likewise, conventional farmers saw great risk and little benefit in preventive measures for weed control. We expect that thorough two-way communication and a deeper understanding of farmer belief systems will facilitate the development of audience-specific outreach programs with an enhanced probability of affecting better weed management decisions.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Corresponding author's E-mail: Doohan.1@osu.edu
References
Hide All
Alhakami, A. S. and Slovic, P. 1994. A psychological study of the inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit. Risk Anal. 14:10851096.
Anderson, R. L. 2008. Diversity and no-till: keys for pest management in the US Great Plains. Weed Sci. 56:141145.
Andrews, P. W. 2001. The psychology of social chess and the evolution of attribution mechanisms: explaining the fundamental attribution error. Evol. Hum. Behav. 22:1129.
Bar-Shira, Z., Just, R., and Zilberman, D. 1997. Estimation of farmers' risk attitude: an econometric approach. Agric. Econ. 17:211221.
Beckie, H. J., Leeson, J. Y., Thomas, A. G., Brenzil, C. A., Hall, L. M., Holzgang, G., Lozinski, C., and Shirriff, S. 2008. Weed resistance monitoring in the Canadian prairies. Weed Technol. 22:530543.
Blackshaw, R. E., Harker, N. K., O'Donovan, J. T., Beckie, H. J., and Smith, E. J. 2008. Ongoing development of integrated weed management systems on the Canadian prairies. Weed Sci. 56:146150.
Bostrom, A., Fischhoff, B., and Morgan, M. G. 1992. Characterizing mental models of hazardous processes: a methodology and an application to radon. J. Soc. Issues. 48:85100.
Bostrom, A., Morgan, M. G., Fischhoff, B., and Read, D. 1994. What do people know about global climate change? 1. Mental models. Risk Anal. 14:959970.
Canales, E., Parker, J., Wilson, R., Tucker, M., and Doohan, D. 2008. Knowledge, perception and attitudes of organic farmers about weed management. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. Abstract 138.
Czapar, G. F., Curry, M. P., and Gray, M. E. 1995. Survey of integrated pest management practices in central Illinois. J. Prod. Agric. 8:483486.
Czapar, G. F., Curry, M. P., and Wax, L. M. 1997. Grower acceptance of economic thresholds for weed management in Illinois. Weed Technol. 11:828831.
Davis, G. B. and Olson, M. H. 1985. Management Information Systems: Conceptual Foundations, Structure, and Development, 2nd ed. New York McGraw Hill.
Eckert, E. and Bell, A. 2006. Continuity and change: themes of mental model development among small-scale farmers. J. Ext. [Online] 44.
Finnoff, D., Shogren, J. F., Leung, B., and Lodge, D. 2006. Take a risk: preferring prevention over control of biological invaders. Ecol. Econ. 62:216222.
Fischhoff, B. and Downs, J. 1997. Accentuate the relevant. Psychol. Sci. 8:154158.
Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., Reid, S., and Coombs, B. 1978. How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sci. 9:127152.
Gunsolus, J. L. and Buhler, D. D. 1999. A risk management perspective on integrated weed management. Pages 225238. In Buhler, D. ed. Expanding the Context of Weed Management. New York Haworth Press.
Hammond, C. L., Luschei, E. C., Boerboom, C. M., and Nowak, P. J. 2006. Adoption of integrated pest management tactics by Wisconsin farmers. Weed Technol. 20:756767.
Johnson, W. G. and Gibson, K. D. 2006. Glyphosate-resistant weeds and resistance management strategies: an Indiana grower perspective. Weed Technol. 20:768772.
Jones, E. E. and Nisbett, R. E. 1971. The actor and the observer: divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. Pages 7994. In Jones, E. E., et al eds. Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior. Morristown, NJ General Learning Press.
Jones, R. and Monjardino, M. 2006. The economic benefits of adopting integrated weed management. Pages 110. In McGillion, T. and Storrie, A. eds. Integrated Weed Management in Australian Cropping Systems—A Training Resource for Farm Advisors. Adelaide, Australia: CRC for Australian Weed Management.
Kelley, H. H. and Michela, J. L. 1980. Attribution theory and research. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 31:457501.
Leung, B., Lodge, D., Finnoff, D., Shogren, J. F., Lewis, M. A., and Lamberti, G. 2002. An ounce of prevention or a pound of cure: bioeconomic risk analysis of invasive species. Proc. R. Soc. Bio. Sci. 269:24072413.
Llewellyn, R. S. and Allen, D. M. 2006. Expected mobility of herbicide resistance via weed seeds and pollen in a Western Australian cropping region. Crop Prod. 25:520526.
Llewellyn, R. S., Lindner, R. K., Pannell, D. J., and Powles, S. B. 2002. Resistance and the herbicide resource: perceptions of Western Australian grain growers. Crop Prot. 21:10671075.
Llewellyn, R. S., Pannell, D. J., Lindner, R. K., and Powles, S. B. 2005. Targeting key perceptions when planning and evaluating extension. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 45:16271633.
Luschei, E. C., Hammond, C. M., Boerboom, C. M., and Nowak, P. J. 2009. Convenience sample of on-farm research cooperators representative of Wisconsin farmers. Weed Technol. 23:300307.
Maharik, M. and Fischhoff, B. 1993. Risk knowledge and risk attitudes regarding nuclear energy sources in space. Risk Anal. 13:345353.
Morgan, M. G., Fischhoff, B., Bostrom, A., and Atman, C. J. 2002. Risk Communication: A Mental Models Approach. Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press.
Morgan, M. G., Fischhoff, B., Bostrom, A., Lave, L., and Atman, C. J. 1992. Communicating risk to the public. Environ. Sci. Technol. 11:20482056.
Moss, S. R. 2008. Weed research: is it delivering what it should? Weed Res. 48:389393.
[NAAS] National Agricultural Statistics Service 2009. U.S. Crop Acreage Down Slightly in 2009, but Corn and Soybean Acres Up. http://www.nass.usda.gov/Newsroom/2009/06_30_2009.asp. Accessed: December 8, 2009.
Neve, P. and Powles, S. B. 2005. Recurrent selection with reduced herbicide rates results in the rapid evolution of herbicide resistance in Lolium rigidum . Theor. Appl. Genet. 110:11541166.
Nisbett, R. E. and Borgida, E. 1975. Attribution and the psychology of prediction. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 32:932943.
Nowak, P. J. and Cabot, P. E. 2004. The human dimension of resource management programs. J. Soil Water Conserv. 59:128135.
Owen, M. D. K. 1998. Producer attitudes and weed management. Pages 4359. In Hatfield, J. L., et al eds. Integrated Weed Management. Chelsea, MI Ann Arbor.
Padel, S. 2001. Conversion to organic farming: a typical example of the diffusion of an innovation? Sociol. Ruralis. 41 (1):4061.
Poweles, S. B., Preston, C., Bryan, I. B., and Jutsum, A. R. 1997. Herbicide resistance: impact and management. Pages 5793. In Sparks, D. L. ed. Advances in Agronomy. Vol. 58. San Diego, CA: Academic.
Rogers, E. M. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th ed. New York Free Press.
Sanyal, D., Bhowmik, P. C., Anderson, R. L., and Shrestha, A. 2008. Revisiting the perspective and progress of integrated weed management. Weed Sci. 56:161167.
Simon, H. A. 1990. Invariants in human behavior. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 41:119.
Storrie, A. 2006. Case studies. Pages 211248. In McGillion, T. and Storrie, A. eds. Integrated Weed Management in Australian Cropping Systems—A Training Resource for Farm Advisors. Adelaide, Australia: CRC for Australian Weed Management.
Strotz, R. H. 1956. Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. Rev. Econ. Stud. 23:165180.
Swanton, C. J. and Weise, S. F. 1991. Integrated weed management: the rationale and approach. Weed Technol. 5:657663.
Vanclay, F. 1992. Barriers to adoption: a general overview of the issues. Rural Sociol. 2:1012.
Wilson, R. S., Tucker, M. A., Hooker, N., LeJeune, J., and Doohan, D. 2008. Perceptions and beliefs about weed management: perspectives of Ohio grain and produce farmers. Weed Technol. 22:339350.
Wszelaki, A. and Doohan, D. 2003. Comparing weed communities in organic and conventional vegetable farms across Ohio. Proceedings of the OFFER Horticulture Workshop. 24th Annual OEFFA conference, March 8–9, 2003, Johnstown, OH.
Zaksek, M. and Arvai, J. L. 2004. Toward improved communication about wildland fire: mental models research to identify information needs for natural resource management. Risk Anal. 24:15031514.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Weed Science
  • ISSN: 0043-1745
  • EISSN: 1550-2759
  • URL: /core/journals/weed-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed