Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T17:16:35.847Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ALS-Inhibitor Resistance in Populations of Eastern Black Nightshade (Solanum ptycanthum) from Ontario

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jamshid Ashigh
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
François J. Tardif*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: ftardif@uoguelph.ca

Abstract

Populations of eastern black nightshade suspected of being resistant to acetolactate synthase (ALS) inhibitors have been reported since 1999 in different locations in Ontario, Canada. This event has threatened the use of ALS inhibitors for control of this species. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the spectrum of resistance to different ALS-inhibiting herbicides and to examine the effectiveness of alternative modes of action herbicides. Growth room experiments were conducted to determine the response to imazethapyr and atrazine in seven suspected ALS inhibitor– resistant populations. One resistant and one susceptible population were further characterized for their response to ALS inhibitors and chloroacetamides. Seven populations were able to survive imazethapyr at 100 g ai/ha, while there was no resistance to atrazine. Compared to a susceptible (S) population, resistant (R) population SOLPT 1 had 726-, 31-, 6-, and 4-fold resistance to postemergence (POST) applied imazethapyr, imazamox, primisulfuron, and flumetsulam, respectively. Preemergence (PRE) application of imazethapyr, flumetsulam, cloransulam, nicosulfuron, prosulfuron, and rimsulfuron did not provide control of the R population, whereas they totally controlled the S population. The chloroacetamide herbicides metolachlor, dimethenamid, and flufenacet all provided at least 90% control of both R and S populations when applied PRE at the recommended field rates. The ALS inhibitors will not provide adequate control of these resistant populations, but acceptable control could be achieved with chloroacetamides or with atrazine.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bassett, I. J. and Munro, D. B. 1985. The biology of Canadian weeds. 67. Solanum ptycanthum Dun., S. nigrum L. and S. sarrachoides Sendt. Can. J. Plant Sci. 65:401414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernasconi, P., Woodworth, A. R., Rosin, B. A., Subramanian, M. V., and Siehl, D. L. 1995. A naturally occurring point mutation confers broad range tolerance to herbicides that target acetolactate synthase. J. Biol. Chem. 270:1738117385.Google Scholar
Boutsalis, P. and Powles, S. B. 1995. Inheritance and mechanism of resistance to herbicides inhibiting acetolactate synthase in Sonchus oleraceus L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 91:242247.Google Scholar
Christopher, J. T., Powles, S. B., Liljegren, D. R., and Holtum, J. A. M. 1991. Cross resistance to herbicides in annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum). II. Chlorsulfuron resistance involves a wheat-like detoxification system. Plant Physiol. 95:10361043.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cotterman, J. C. and Saari, L. L. 1992. Rapid metabolic inactivation is the basis for cross-resistance to chlorsulfuron in diclofop-methyl-resistant rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) SR4/84. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 43:182192.Google Scholar
Heap, I. 2005. International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. Web page:http://www.weedscience.com. Accessed: February 10, 2005.Google Scholar
Hermanutz, L. A. and Weaver, S. E. 1994. Variability in metribuzin tolerance among ruderal and agrestal populations of Solanum ptycanthum Dun. Can. J. Plant Sci. 74:395401.Google Scholar
Jasieniuk, M., Brulé-Babel, A. L., and Morrison, I. N. 1996. The evolution and genetics of herbicide resistance in weeds. Weed Sci. 44:176193.Google Scholar
Kemp, M. S., Moss, S. R., and Thomas, T. H. 1990. Herbicide resistance in Alopecurus myosuroides . in Green, M. B., LeBaron, H. M., and Moberg, W. K., eds. Managing Resistance to Agrochemicals. From Fundamental Research to Practical Strategies. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society. Pp. 376393.Google Scholar
Mallory-Smith, C., Hendrickson, P., and Mueller-Warrant, G. 1999. Cross-resistance of primisulfuron-resistant Bromus tectorum L. (downy brome) to sulfosulfuron. Weed Sci. 47:256257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, B. D. and Mortimer, A. M. 1994. Selection of herbicide resistance. in Powles, S. B. and Holtum, J.A.M., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants, Biology and Biochemistry. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis. Pp. 127.Google Scholar
McGiffen, M. E. Jr. and Masiunas, J. B. 1992. Prediction of eastern black nightshade (Solanum ptycanthum) growth using degree days. Weed Sci. 40:8689.Google Scholar
Milliman, L. D., Riechers, D. E., Wax, L. M., and Simmons, F. W. 2003. Characterization of two biotypes of imidazolinone-resistant eastern black nightshade (Solanum ptycanthum). Weed Sci. 51:139144.Google Scholar
Moss, S. R. and Cussans, G. W. 1991. The development of herbicide resistant populations of Alopecurus myosuroides (black-grass) in England. in Caseley, J. C., Cussans, G. W., and Atkin, R. K., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Weeds and Crops. Oxford, U.K.: Butterworth-Heinemann. Pp. 445456.Google Scholar
Ogg, A. G. Jr. 1986. Variation in response of four nightshades (Solanum spp.) to herbicides. Weed Sci. 34:765772.Google Scholar
Quakenbush, L. S. and Andersen, R. N. 1984. Distribution and biology of two nightshades (Solanum spp.) in Minnesota. Weed Sci. 32:529533.Google Scholar
Saari, L. L., Cotterman, J. C., and Thill, D. C. 1994. Resistance to acetolactate synthase inhibiting herbicides. in Powles, S. B. and Holtum, J.A.M., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants, Biology and Biochemistry. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis. Pp. 141170.Google Scholar
Seefeldt, D. L., Jensen, J. E., and Fuerst, E. P. 1995. Log-logistic analysis of herbicide dose–response relationships. Weed Technol. 9:218227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprague, C. L., Stoller, E. W., and Wax, L. M. 1997. Response of an acetolactate synthase (ALS)-resistant biotype of Amaranthus rudis to selected ALS inhibiting and alternative herbicides. Weed Res. 37:93101.Google Scholar
Stoller, E. W. and Myers, R. A. 1989. Response of soybeans (Glycine max) and four broadleaf weeds to reduced irradiance. Weed Sci. 37:570574.Google Scholar
Tardif, F. J., Holtum, J. A. M., and Powles, S. B. 1993. Occurrence of a herbicide-resistant acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase mutant in annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) selected by sethoxydim. Planta 190:176181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tranel, P. J. and Wright, T. R. 2002. Resistance of weeds to ALS-inhibiting herbicides: what have we learned? Weed Sci. 50:700712.Google Scholar
Volenberg, D. S., Stoltenberg, D. E., and Boerboom, C. M. 2000. Solanum ptycanthum resistance to acetolactate synthase inhibitors. Weed Sci. 48:399401.Google Scholar
Ward, K. I. and Weaver, S. E. 1996. Response of eastern black nightshade (Solanum ptycanthum) to low rates of imazethapyr and metolachlor. Weed Sci. 44:897902.Google Scholar
Whaley, C. M., Wilson, H. P., and Westwood, J. H. 2004. Characterization of a new ALS-inhibitor resistance mutation from the ALS gene of smooth pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus). Weed Sci. Soc. Amer. Abstr. 44:161.Google Scholar