Hostname: page-component-5d84bcc8dc-qvhhc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-09-14T04:55:12.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Vegetable soybean tolerance to flumioxazin-based treatments for waterhemp control is similar to grain-type soybean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2019

Martin M. Williams II Open the ORCID record for Martin M. Williams II [Opens in a new window] ,
James L. Moody  and
Nicholas E. Hausman
Martin M. Williams II*
Affiliation:
Ecologist, US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Global Change and Photosynthesis Research, Urbana, ILUSA
James L. Moody
Affiliation:
Biological Science Technician (retired), US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Global Change and Photosynthesis Research, Urbana, ILUSA
Nicholas E. Hausman
Affiliation:
Agricultural Science Technician, US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Global Change and Photosynthesis Research, Urbana, ILUSA
*
Author for correspondence: Martin M. Williams II, Email: martin.williams@ars.usda.gov
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Herbicides registered in vegetable soybean often fail to control waterhemp. The objective of this research was to quantify vegetable soybean tolerance to preemergence herbicides for early-season waterhemp control, including flumioxazin applied alone PRE or in mixture with chlorimuron, metribuzin, or pyroxasulfone at use rates in grain-type soybean. Crop tolerance to the herbicides was tested in field trials with 20 vegetable soybean cultivars and four grain-type cultivars through 4 wk after treatment (WAT). Flumioxazin-based treatments were equally safe, resulting in only minor, transitory crop response (<5% injury 2 WAT) and no effect on crop emergence or early season growth. Flumioxazin mixtures provided greater than 99% control of waterhemp 4 WAT, as evidenced by reduced weed density from 29.7 plants m−2 in the nontreated control to no waterhemp. Flumioxazin applied alone or in tank mixture with chlorimuron, metribuzin, or pyroxasulfone were as safe in vegetable soybean as previously reported in grain-type soybean. Registration of these products in vegetable soybean would provide the industry with additional options for managing waterhemp.

Keywords

Amit Jhala, University of Nebraska, LincolnCrop injuryedamameherbicide toleranceminor cropwaterhempchlorimuronflumioxazinmetribuzinpyroxasulfonetall waterhemp, Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.) J.D. Sauer, AMATUsoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 33 , Issue 3 , June 2019 , pp. 530 - 534
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Baron, J, Holm, R, Kunkel, D, Schwartz, PH, Markle, G (2016) The IR-4 Project Over 50 Years of Sustained Success. Research Information Ltd. www.ir4project.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/S4.pdf. Accessed: February 4, 2019Google Scholar
Crawford, LE, Williams, MM II (2018) Role of edamame (Glycine max) seed size in early crop-weed interactions. Weed Sci 66:746–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, LE, Williams, MM II (2019) Planting depth and seed size affect edamame emergence individually. HortScience 54:92–94 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duppong, LM, Hatterman-Valenti, H (2005) Yield and quality of vegetable soybean cultivars for production in North Dakota. HortTechnology 15:896–900 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, CJ, Barrentine, WL, Kilen, TC (1975) Inheritance of sensitivity to metribuzin in soybean. Crop Sci 16:119–120 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, NE, Tranel, PJ, Riechers, DE, Maxwell, DJ, Gonzini, LC, Hager, AG (2013) Responses of an HPPD inhibitor-resistant waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) population to soil-residual herbicides. Weed Technol 27:704–711 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heap, I (2018) The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. www.weedscience.org. Accessed: March 20, 2018Google Scholar
McNaughton, KE, Shropshire, C, Robinson, DE, Sikkema, PH (2014) Soybean (Glycine max) tolerance to timing applications of pyroxasulfone, flumioxazin, and pyroxasulfone + flumioxazin. Weed Technol 28:494-500 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mentreddy, SR, Mohamed, AI, Joshee, N, Yadav, AK (2002) Edamame: a nutritious vegetable crop. Pages 432–438 in Janick, J, Whipkey, A, eds. Trends in New Crops and New Uses. Proceedings of the Fifth National Symposium New Crops and New Uses: Strength in Diversity. Alexandria, VA: ASHS Press Google Scholar
Neter, J, Kutner, MH, Nachtsheim, CJ, Wasserman, W (1996) Applied Linear Statistical Models. 4th ed. Chicago, IL: Irwin. 1, 408 pGoogle Scholar
Newsom, LJ, Shaw, DR (1992) Soybean (Glycine max) cultivar tolerance to chlorimuron and imazaquin with varying hydroponic solution pH. Weed Technol 6:382–388 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomeranke, GJ, Nickell, CD (1988) Inheritance of chlorimuron ethyl sensitivity in the soybean strains BSR 101 and M74-462. Crop Sci 28:59–60 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, MSS, Bhagsari, AS, Mohamed, AI (2002) Fresh green seed yield and seed nutritional traits of vegetable soybean genotypes. Crop Sci 42:1950–1958 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schryver, MG, Soltani, N, Hooker, DC, Robinson, DE, Tranel, PJ, Sikkema, PH (2017) Control of glyphosate-resistant common waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus var. rudis) in soybean in Ontario. Weed Technol 31:811–812 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, JL, Chatham, LA, Riggins, CW, Tranel, PJ, Bradley, KW. (2015) Distribution of herbicide resistances and molecular mechanisms conferring resistance in Missouri waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis Sauer) populations. Weed Sci 63:336–345 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spaunhorst, DJ, Siefert-Higgins, S, Bradley, KW (2014) Glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) and waterhemp (Ambrosia trifida) management in dicamba-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 28:131–141 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor-Lovell, S, Wax, LM, Nelson, R (2001) Phytotoxic response and yield of soybean (Glycine max) varieties treated with sulfentrazone or flumioxazin. Weed Technol 15:95–102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Wychen, L (2016) 2016 Survey of the Most Common and Troublesome Weeds in Broadleaf Crops, Fruits & Vegetables in the United States and Canada. Weed Science Society of America National Weed Survey Dataset. http://wssa.net/wp-content/uploads/2016-Weed-Survey_Broadleaf-crops.xlsx. Accessed: March 20, 2018Google Scholar
Wax, LM, Stoller, EW, Bernard, RL (1976) Differential response of soybean cultivars to metribuzin. Agron J 68:484–486 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westwood, JH, Charudattan, R, Duke, SO, Fennimore, SA, Marrone, P, Slaughter, DC, Swanton, C, Zollinger, R (2018) Weed management in 2050: perspectives on the future of weed science. Weed Sci 66:275–285 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, MM II (2015) Phenomorphological characterization of vegetable soybean germplasm lines for commercial production. Crop Sci 55:1274–1279 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, MM II, Bradley, CA (2017) Fludioxonil + mefenoxam seed treatment improves edamame seedling emergence. HortTechnology 27:846–851 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, MM II, Hausman, NE, Moody, JL (2017) Vegetable soybean tolerance to pyroxasulfone. Weed Technol 31:416–420 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, MM II, Nelson, RL (2014) Vegetable soybean tolerance to bentazon, fomesafen, imazamox, linuron, and sulfentrazone. Weed Technol 28:601–607 CrossRefGoogle Scholar