Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T15:49:29.364Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Characterization of Fluazifop-P-butyl Activity on Bristly Starbur (Acanthospermum hispidum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Travis C. Teuton ,
Gregory E. MacDonald ,
Christopher L. Main  and
Barry J. Brecke
Travis C. Teuton*
Affiliation:
University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
Gregory E. MacDonald
Affiliation:
University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
Christopher L. Main
Affiliation:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996
Barry J. Brecke
Affiliation:
University of Florida, West Florida Research and Education Center, Milton, FL 32583
*
E-mail address: teutont@missouri.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

During routine use of fluazifop-P-butyl for grass control, county extension agents in Georgia observed control of bristly starbur in grower fields. Experiments to characterize the activity of fluazifop-P-butyl on bristly starbur were conducted under greenhouse conditions in Gainesville, FL, during 2001 and 2002. Fluazifop-P-butyl activity was characterized as a function of herbicide rate and time after application. Commercially available fluazifop-P-butyl was compared to technical fluazifop-P-butyl as a function of herbicide rate and bristly starbur height. Finally, injury to bristly starbur was evaluated when clethodim, diclofop, fluazifop-P-butyl, haloxyfop, quizalofop-p, and sethoxydim were applied at two growth stages. Fluazifop-P-butyl caused >90% injury to bristly starbur with all other post graminicides displaying <8% injury. Nonlinear regression revealed a sigmoidal response of bristly starbur injury to fluazifop-P-butyl. Estimates for 50 and 90% bristly starbur injury (I50 and I90) were 0.07 and 0.14 kg ai/ha, respectively. There was no difference in activity of technical and commercial fluazifop-P-butyl formulations. There was a differential response of bristly starbur to fluazifop-P-butyl over time as a function of plant height at the time of treatment. However, 14 days after treatment (DAT) all treatments displayed >89% injury. Bristly starbur response to fluazifop-P-butyl was similar to injury associated with contact-type herbicides.

Keywords

Clethodimdiclofopfluazifop-P-butyl, Fusilade DXhaloxyfopquizalofop-psethoxydimbristly starbur, Acanthospermum hispidum DC #3 ACNHIACCasearyloxyphenoxycyclohexanedioneprotoporhyrinogen oxidasePROTOXArachis hypogaea L., Gossypium hirsutum L.ACCase, acetyl-CoA carboxylasePOST, postemergenceWAE, weeks after emergence
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , September 2006 , pp. 717 - 721
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Askew, S. D., Shaw, D. R., and Street, J. E. 2000. Graminicide application timing influences red rice (Oryza sativa) control and seedhead reduction in soybean (Gycine max). Weed Technol. 14:176–181.Google Scholar
Becerril, J. M. and Duke, S. O. 1989. Protoporphyrin IX content correlates with activity of photobleaching herbicides. Plant Physiol. 90:1175–1181.Google Scholar
Bradley, K. W. and Hagood, E. S. 2001. Identification of a johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) biotype resistant to aryloxypenoxypropionate and cyclohexanedione herbicides in Virginia. Weed Technol. 15:623–627.Google Scholar
Burton, J. D., Gronwald, J. W., Somers, D. A., Gengenbach, B. G., and Wyse, D. L. 1989. Inhibition of corn acetyl-CoA carboxylase by cyclohexanedione and aryloxyphenoxy propionate herbicides. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 34:76–85.Google Scholar
Bus, J. S., Aust, S. D., and Gibson, J. E. 1974. Superoxide and singlet oxygen catalyzed lipid peroxidation as a possible mechanism for PQ (methyl-viologen) toxicity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 58:749–755.Google Scholar
Devine, M., Duke, S. O., and Fedtke, C. 1993a. Physiology of Herbicide Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Pp. 230–233.Google Scholar
Devine, M., Duke, S. O., and Fedtke, C. 1993b. Physiology of Herbicide Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Pp. 152–156.Google Scholar
Devine, M., Duke, S. O., and Fedtke, C. 1993c. Physiology of Herbicide Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Pp. 163–166.Google Scholar
Di Tomaso, J. M., Stone, A. E., and Brown, P. H. 1993. Inhibition of lipid synthesis by diclofop-methyl is age dependent in roots of oat and corn. Pestic. Biochem. Phys. 45:210–219.Google Scholar
Evers, G. W. 2001. Herbicides for desiccating dallisgrass (Paspalum dilatatum)–bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) pasture sod prior to overseeding with annual ryegrass (Lolium muliflorum). Weed Technol. 16:235–238.Google Scholar
Grichar, G. W., Besler, B. A., Brewer, K. D., and Lemon, R. G. 2003. Interaction of pyrithiobac and graminicides for weed control in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 17:461–466.Google Scholar
Hall, D. W. and Vandiver, V. V. 2003. Bristly Starbur, Acanthospermum hispidum D.C. University of Florida Cooperative Extension Service: Web page: http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/BODY_FW004. Accessed: January 20, 2004.Google Scholar
Luo, X. Y. and Matsumoto, H. 2002. Susceptability of a broadleaf weed, Acanthospermum hispidum, to the grass herbicide fluazifop-butyl. Weed Biol. Manage. 2:98–103. DOI:101046/j.1445-664.2002.00053.x.Google Scholar
Manley, B. S., Wilson, H. P., and Hines, T. E. 2002. Management programs and crop rotations influence populations of annual grass weeds and yellow nutsedge. Weed Sci. 50:112–119.Google Scholar
Moss, S. R., Cocker, K. M., Brown, A. C., Hall, L., and Field, L. M. 2003. Characterization of target-site resistance to ACCase-inhibiting herbicides in the weed Alopecurus myosuroides (black-grass). Pest Manage. Sci. 59:190–201.Google Scholar
Paulsgrove, M. D. and Wilcut, J. W. 1999. Weed management in bromoxynil-resistant Gossypium hirsutum . Weed Sci. 47:596–601.Google Scholar
Porter, W. C. 1993. Postemergence grass control in sweet potatoes (Ipomoea batatas). Weed Technol. 7:812–815.Google Scholar
Rabinowitch, H. D. and Fridovich, I. 1983. Superoxide radicals, superoxide dismutases and oxygen toxicity in plants. Photochem. PhotoBiol. 37:679–690.Google Scholar
Rendina, A. R. and Felts, J. M. 1988. Cyclohexanedione herbicides are selective and potent inhibitors of acetyl-CoA carboxylase from grasses. Plant Physiol. 86:983–986.Google Scholar
[SAS] SAS Institute. 1999. SAS/STAT User's Guide (Version 8). Cary, NC: SAS Institute. Pp. 2083–2226.Google Scholar
Scott, R. C., Shaw, D. R., Ratliff, R. L., and Newsom, L. J. 1998. Synergism of grass weed control with postemergence combinations of SAN 582 and fluazifop-P, imazethapyr, or sethoxydim. Weed Technol. 12:268–274.Google Scholar
Secor, J. and Cseke, C. 1988. Inhibition of acetyl-CoA carboxylase activity by haloxyfop and tralkoxydim. Plant Phys. 86:10–12.Google Scholar
Seefeldt, S. S., Jensen, J. E., and Fuerst, E. P. 1995. Log-logistic analysis of herbicide dose–response relationships. Weed Technol. 9:218–227.Google Scholar
Vencill, W. K. ed. 2002a. Fluazifop-P-butyl. in Herbicide Handbook. 8th ed. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America. Pp. 188–190.Google Scholar
Vencill, W. K. ed. 2002b. Lactofen. in Herbicide Handbook. 8th ed. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America. Pp. 269–270.Google Scholar
Vencill, W. K. ed. 2002c. Paraquat. in Herbicide Handbook. 8th ed. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America. Pp. 333–335.Google Scholar
Volenberg, D. and Stoltenberg, D. 2002. Altered acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase confers resisistance to clethodim, fluazifop-P-butyl, and sethoxydim in Setaria faberi and Digitaria sanguinalis . Weed Res. 42:342–350.Google Scholar
Walker, R. H., Wells, L. W., and McGuire, J. A. 1989. Bristly starbur (Acanthospermum hispidum) interference with peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci. 37:196–200.Google Scholar
Webster, T. M. 2001. Weed survey—southern states. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 54:244–259.Google Scholar
Webster, T. M., Wilcut, J. W., and Coble, H. D. 1997. Influence of AC 263,222 rate and application method on weed management in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol. 11:520–526.Google Scholar
Yasin, J. Z., Althahabi, S., Abuirmaileh, B. E., Saxena, M. C., and Haddad, N. I. 1995. Chemical weed control in chickpea and lentil. Int. J. Pest Manage. 41:60–65.Google Scholar