Skip to main content
×
Home

Comparison of Glyphosate Salts (Isopropylamine, Diammonium, and Potassium) and Calcium and Magnesium Concentrations on the Control of Various Weeds

  • Thomas C. Mueller (a1), Christopher L. Main (a1), M. Angela Thompson (a1) and Lawrence E. Steckel (a1)
Abstract

Greenhouse and field experiments were conducted near Knoxville, TN, during 2002 and 2003 to investigate the effects of calcium and magnesium ions on the performance of three glyphosate formulations with and without diammonium sulfate (AMS). Weed species investigated in the greenhouse were broadleaf signalgrass, pitted morningglory, Palmer amaranth, and yellow nutsedge. Three glyphosate formulations (isopropylamine salt, diammonium salt, and potassium salt) and two glyphosate application rates (0.42 and 0.84 kg ae/ha) were applied to weeds in water fortified with either calcium or magnesium at concentrations of 0, 250, 500, 750, and 1,000 ppm. In all comparisons, there were no differences in the three glyphosate formulations. Glyphosate activity was reduced only when cation concentration was >250 ppm, and this antagonism was not observed when 2% w/ w AMS was added to the spray solution. A chemical analysis of the calcium and magnesium concentrations in water collected from farmers indicated that water samples from eight different producers contained relatively low amounts of cations, with calcium at <40 ppm and magnesium at <8 ppm. In the field results using these and other waters as the herbicide carrier, broadleaf signalgrass control was greater with the 0.84 kg ae/ha than 0.42 kg ae/ha glyphosate rate regardless of water source or addition of AMS. Pitted morningglory responded similarly to glyphosate with water from all farms and with AMS added, and the addition of AMS gave similar results for both glyphosate rates. In 2003, common cocklebur was evaluated and control was >93% regardless of glyphosate rate, water source, or AMS addition. Based on these results, the addition of AMS-based adjuvants to many glyphosate applications may not be warranted.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Corresponding author's E-mail: tmueller@tk.edu
References
Hide All
Bouman P. W. 1987. Inductively Coupled Plasma Emission Spectroscopy, Part 1. New York: Wiley-Interscience. Pp. 156.
Buhler and Burnside. 1983. Effect of water quality, carrier volume and acid on glyphosate phytotoxicity. Weed Sci. 31:163169.
Carmer S. G., Nyquist W. E., and Walker W. M. 1989. Least significant differences for combined analysis of experiments with two- or three-factor treatment designs. Agron. J. 81:665672.
Faircloth W. H., Monks C. D., Patterson M. G., Wehtje G. R., Delaney D. R., and Sanders J. C. 2004. Cotton and weed response to glyphosate applied with sulfur-containing additives. Weed Technol. 18:404411.
Gauvrit C. 2003. Glyphosate response to calcium, ethoxylated amine surfactant, and ammonium sulfate. Weed Technol. 17:799804.
Glass R. L. 1984. Metal complex formation by glyphosate. J. Agric. Food Chem. 32:12491253.
Hatzios K. K. and Penner D. 1985. Interaction of herbicides with other agricultural chemicals in higher plants. Rev. Weed Sci. 1:164.
Jordan D. L., York A. C., Griffin J. L., Clay P. A., Vidrin P. R., and Reynolds D. B. 1997. Influence of application variables on efficacy of glyphosate. Weed Technol. 11:354362.
McIntosh M. S. 1983. Analysis of combined experiments. Agron. J. 75:153155.
Nalewaja J. D. and Matysiak R. 1991. Salt antagonism of glyphosate. Weed Sci. 39:622628.
Nalewaja J. D. and Matysiak R. 1992a. 2,4-D and salt combinations affect glyphosate phytotoxicity. Weed Technol. 6:322327.
Nalewaja J. D. and Matysiak R. 1992b. Species differ in response to adjuvants with glyphosate. Weed Technol. 6:561566.
Nalewaja J. D. and Matysiak R. 1993a. Optimizing adjuvants to overcome glyphosate antagonistic salts. Weed Technol. 7:337342.
Nalewaja J. D. and Matysiak R. 1993b. Influence of diammonium sulfate and other salts on glyphosate phytotoxicity. Pesticide Sci. 38:7784.
Nalewaja J. D., Matysiak R., and Freeman T. P. 1992. Spray droplet residual of glyphosate in various carriers. Weed Sci. 40:576589.
O'Sullivan P. A., O'Donovan J. T., and Hamman W. M. 1981. Influence of nonionic surfactants, ammonium sulfate, water quality and spray volume on phytotoxicity of glyphosate. Can. J. Plant Sci. 61:391400.
Pratt D., Kells J. J., and Penner D. 2003. Substitutes for ammonium sulfate as additives for glyphosate and glufosinate. Weed Technol. 17:576581.
Sandberg C. L., Meggitt W. F., and Penner D. 1978. Effect of volume and calcium on glyphosate phytotoxicity. Weed Sci. 26:476479.
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 2000. SAS User's guide Version 8.1. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. Pp. 235237.
Schonherr J. and Schreiber L. 2004. Interactions of calcium ions with weakly acidic active ingredients slow cuticular penetration: A case study with glyphosate. J. Agric. & Food Chem. 52:65466551.
Shaw D. R. and Arnold J. C. 2002. Weed control from herbicide combinations with glyphosate. Weed Technol. 16:16.
Shey P. J. and Tupy D. R. 1984. Reversal of cation-induced reduction in glyphosate activity with EDTA. Weed Sci. 32:802806.
Shillevg D. G. and Waller W. T. 1989. Interaction effects of diluent pH and calcium content of glyphosate activity on Panicum repens L. (torpedograss). Weed Res. 29:441448.
Thelen K. D., Jackson E. P., and Penner D. 1995. The basis for the hard-water antagonism of glyphosate activity. Weed Sci. 43:541548.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Weed Technology
  • ISSN: 0890-037X
  • EISSN: 1550-2740
  • URL: /core/journals/weed-technology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 4 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 111 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 20th January 2017 - 13th December 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.