Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T03:07:33.698Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Occurrence and Molecular Characterization of Acetolactate Synthase (ALS) Inhibitor–Resistant Kochia (Kochia scoparia) in Western Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Hugh J. Beckie*
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), Saskatoon Research Centre, 107 Science Place, Saskatoon, SK S7N 0X2, Canada
Suzanne I. Warwick
Affiliation:
AAFC, Eastern Cereal and Oilseed Research Centre, K.W. Neatby Building, Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa, ON K1A 0C6, Canada
Connie A. Sauder
Affiliation:
AAFC, Eastern Cereal and Oilseed Research Centre, K.W. Neatby Building, Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa, ON K1A 0C6, Canada
Chris Lozinski
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), Saskatoon Research Centre, 107 Science Place, Saskatoon, SK S7N 0X2, Canada
Scott Shirriff
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), Saskatoon Research Centre, 107 Science Place, Saskatoon, SK S7N 0X2, Canada
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: hugh.beckie@agr.gc.ca

Abstract

A survey of 109 fields was conducted across western Canada in spring 2007 to determine the extent of ALS-inhibitor and dicamba (synthetic auxin) resistance in kochia. Weed seedlings were collected from fields in three provinces of western Canada and transplanted into the greenhouse. Seeds were harvested from selfed plants, and the F1 progeny were screened for resistance to the ALS-inhibitor mixture thifensulfuron–tribenuron or dicamba. All kochia populations were susceptible to dicamba. ALS inhibitor–resistant kochia was found in 85% of the fields surveyed in western Canada: 80 of 95 fields in Alberta, six of seven fields in Saskatchewan, and all seven fields in Manitoba. For the 93 ALS inhibitor–resistant populations, the mean frequency (±SE) of parental plants classified as resistant was 61 ± 3%. Most of the resistant populations (87%) were heterogeneous and contained both resistant and susceptible individuals. ALS sequence data (Pro197 and Asp376 mutations) and genotyping data (Trp574 mutation) obtained for 87 kochia parental (i.e., field-collected) plants confirmed the presence of all three target-site mutations as well as two mutational combinations (Pro197 + Trp574, Asp376 + Trp574) in resistant individuals.

En primavera de 2007, se llevó al cabo un estudio en 109 campos en el occidente de Canadá para determinar en Kochia scoparia el grado de resistencia a inhibidor de ALS y dicamba (auxina sintética). En campos de tres provincias del occidente de Canadá, se recolectaron plántulas de esta maleza y se trasplantaron en un invernadero. Las semillas producidas por esas plantas fueron cosechadas y la progenie F1 fue evaluada para determinar su resistencia a la mezcla de thifensulfurón y tribenurón (inhibidores de ALS) o dicamba. Todas las poblaciones de K. scoparia fueron susceptibles a dicamba. Kochia resistente al inhibidor ALS se encontró en el 85% de los campos muestreados en el occidente de Canadá: 80 de 95 campos en Alberta, seis de siete en Saskatchewan y todos los siete de Manitoba. Para las 93 poblaciones resistentes al inhibidor ALS, la frecuencia media (+SE) de plantas madres clasificadas como resistentes, fue 61+3%. La mayoría de las poblaciones resistentes (87%) fueron heterogéneas y contenían tanto individuos resistentes como susceptibles. Los datos de la secuencia ALS (mutaciones Pro197 y Asp376) y los del genotipo (mutación Trp574) obtenidos para las 87 plantas madres (i.e., colectadas en el campo), confirmaron la presencia de las mutaciones de tres lugares-objetivo, así como con dos combinaciones mutacionales (Pro197 + Trp574, Asp376 + Trp574) en individuos resistentes.

Type
Notes
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Beckie, H. J., Leeson, J. Y., Thomas, A. G., Brenzil, C. A., Hall, L. M., Holzgang, G., Lozinski, C., and Shirriff, S. 2008. Weed resistance monitoring in the Canadian Prairies. Weed Technol. 22:530543.Google Scholar
Beckie, H. J., Weiss, R. M., Leeson, J. Y., and Olfert, O. O. 2010. Range expansion of kochia (Kochia scoparia) in North America under a changing climate. In. Proceedings of the 2009 National Meeting, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC: Canadian Weed Science Society. http://www.weedscience.ca. Accessed: October 1, 2010.Google Scholar
Foes, M. J., Liu, L., Vigue, G., Stroller, E. W., Wax, L. M., and Tranel, P. J. 1999. A kochia (Kochia scoparia) biotype resistant to triazine and ALS-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Sci. 47:2027.Google Scholar
Forcella, F. 1985. Spread of kochia in the northwestern United States. Weeds Today 16:46.Google Scholar
Friesen, L. F., Beckie, H. J., Warwick, S. I., and Van Acker, R. C. 2009. The biology of Canadian weeds. 138. Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad. Can. J. Plant Sci 89:141167.Google Scholar
Guttieri, M. J., Eberlein, C. V., Mallory-Smith, C. A., Thill, D. C., and Hoffman, D. L. 1992. DNA sequence variation in Domain A of the acetolactate synthase genes of herbicide-resistant and -susceptible weed biotypes. Weed Sci. 40:670676.Google Scholar
Guttieri, M. J., Eberlein, C. V., and Thill, D. C. 1995. Diverse mutations in the acetolactate synthase gene confer chlorsulfuron resistance in kochia (Kochia scoparia) biotypes. Weed Sci. 43:175178.Google Scholar
Heap, I. M. 2010. International Survey of Herbicide-Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.com. Accessed: April 2010.Google Scholar
Lassmann, T. and Sonnhammer, E. L. 2005. Kalign—an accurate and fast multiple sequence alignment algorithm. BMC Bioinformatics 6:298.Google Scholar
Leeson, J. Y., Thomas, A. G., Hall, L. M., Brenzil, C. A., Andrews, T., Brown, K. R., and Van Acker, R. C. 2005. Prairie Weed Surveys of Cereal, Oilseed and Pulse crops from the 1970s to the 2000s. Weed Survey Series Publication 05-1. Saskatoon, SK Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. 395 p.Google Scholar
Légère, A., Beckie, H. J., Warwick, S. I., Stevenson, F. C., Hrynewich, B., Lozinski, C., and Johnson, E. 2010. Kochia growth according to ALS (AHAS) mutation. In. Proceedings of the 2010 Annual Meeting, Las Cruces, NM: Western Society of Weed Science. http://wsweedscience.org. Accessed: 1 October 2010.Google Scholar
Morrison, I. N. and Devine, M. D. 1994. Herbicide resistance in the Canadian prairie provinces: five years after the fact. Phytoprotection 75 (Suppl.):516.Google Scholar
Primiani, M. M., Cotterman, J. C., and Saari, L. L. 1990. Resistance of kochia (Kochia scoparia) to sulfonylurea and imidazolinone herbicides. Weed Technol. 4:169172.Google Scholar
Saari, L. L., Cotterman, J. C., and Primiani, M. M. 1990. Mechanism of sulfonylurea herbicide resistance in the broadleaf weed, Kochia scoparia . Plant Physiol 93:5561.Google Scholar
Salava, J., Chodová, D., and Mikulka, J. 2004. Molecular basis of acetolactate synthase-inhibitor resistance in Czech biotypes of kochia. J. Plant Dis. Prot 19:915919.Google Scholar
Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture 2010. Guide to Crop Protection: Weeds, Plant Diseases, Insects. Regina, SK Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture. 440 p. http://www.agriculture.gov.sk.ca/Guide_to_Crop_Protection. Accessed: April 2010.Google Scholar
Sathasivan, K., Haughn, G. W., and Murai, N. 1990. Nucleotide sequence of a mutant acetolactate synthase gene from imidazolinone resistant Arabidopsis thaliana var. Columbia. Nucleic Acids Res 18:2188.Google Scholar
Stallings, G. P., Thill, D. C., Mallory-Smith, C. A., and Shafi, B. 1995. Pollen-mediated gene flow of sulfonylurea-resistant kochia (Kochia scoparia). Weed Sci. 43:95102.Google Scholar
Thomas, A. G. and Leeson, J. Y. 2007. Tracking long-term changes in the arable weed flora of Canada. Pages 4369. In Clements, D. R. and Darbyshire, S. J. eds. Invasive Plants: Inventories, Strategies and Action. Topics in Canadian Weed Science Vol 5. Sainte Anne de Bellevue, QC Canadian Weed Science Society.Google Scholar
Thompson, C. R., Thill, D. C., Mallory-Smith, C. A., and Shafii, B. 1994. Characterization of chlorosulfuron resistant and susceptible kochia (Kochia scoparia). Weed Technol. 8:470476.Google Scholar
Tranel, P. J., Jiang, W., Patzoldt, W. L., and Wright, T. R. 2004. Intraspecific variability of the acetolactate synthase gene. Weed Sci. 52:236241.Google Scholar
Warwick, S. I., Xu, R., Sauder, C., and Beckie, H. J. 2008. Acetolactate synthase target-site mutations and single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping in ALS-resistant kochia (Kochia scoparia). Weed Sci. 56:797806.Google Scholar