Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 91
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Golosov, Grigorii V. Gushchina, Kristina and Kononenko, Pavel 2016. Russia’s local government in the process of authoritarian regime transformation: incentives for the survival of local democracy. Local Government Studies, Vol. 42, Issue. 4, p. 507.

    Horowitz, Shale and Tyburski, Michael 2016. When are similar regimes more likely to form alliances? Institutions and ideologies in the post-communist world. Post-Soviet Affairs, Vol. 32, Issue. 2, p. 176.

    Schwarz, Oliver 2016. Two steps forward one step back: what shapes the process of EU enlargement in South-Eastern Europe?. Journal of European Integration, p. 1.

    Atikcan, Ece Özlem 2015. Diffusion in Referendum Campaigns: The Case of EU Constitutional Referendums. Journal of European Integration, Vol. 37, Issue. 4, p. 451.

    Bandelj, Nina Finley, Katelyn and Radu, Bogdan 2015. Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe: test of early impact. East European Politics, Vol. 31, Issue. 2, p. 129.

    Freyburg, Tina 2015. Transgovernmental Networks as an Apprenticeship in Democracy? Socialization into Democratic Governance through Cross-national Activities. International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 59, Issue. 1, p. 59.

    Grizzle, Cleopatra Stewart, LaShonda and Phillips, Jeremy 2015. Rainy day fund adoption in U.S. states: a case of learning or emulation. International Review of Public Administration, Vol. 20, Issue. 1, p. 17.

    Lafleur, Jean-Michel 2015. The enfranchisement of citizens abroad: variations and explanations. Democratization, Vol. 22, Issue. 5, p. 840.

    Pollock, Gary Brock, Tom and Ellison, Mark 2015. Populism, ideology and contradiction: mapping young people's political views. The Sociological Review, Vol. 63, p. 141.

    Rožič, Peter and Nisnevich, Yuliy A. 2015. Lustration Matters: a Radical Approach to the Problem of Corruption. Studies in Comparative International Development,

    Way, Lucan A. 2015. The limits of autocracy promotion: The case of Russia in the ‘near abroad’. European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 54, Issue. 4, p. 691.

    Conant, Lisa 2014. Compelling criteria? Human rights in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 21, Issue. 5, p. 713.

    Epstein, Rachel A. and Jacoby, Wade 2014. Eastern Enlargement Ten Years On: Transcending the East-West Divide?. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 52, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Greenhill, Brian and Strausz, Michael 2014. Explaining Nonratification of the Genocide Convention: A Nested Analysis. Foreign Policy Analysis, Vol. 10, Issue. 4, p. 371.

    Jacoby, Wade 2014. The EU Factor in Fat Times and in Lean: Did the EU Amplify the Boom and Soften the Bust?. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 52, Issue. 1, p. 52.

    Kartal, Mert 2014. Accounting for the bad apples: the EU's impact on national corruption before and after accession. Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 21, Issue. 6, p. 941.

    O'Dwyer, Conor 2014. What Accounts for Party System Stability? Comparing the Dimensions of Party Competition in Postcommunist Europe. Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 66, Issue. 4, p. 511.

    Pop-Eleches, Grigore and Robertson, Graeme 2014. After the Revolution. Problems of Post-Communism, Vol. 61, Issue. 4, p. 3.

    Dolšak, Nives 2013. Climate Change Policies in the Transitional Economies of Europe and Eurasia: The Role of NGOs. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, Vol. 24, Issue. 2, p. 382.

    Grittersová, Jana 2013. The international dimensions of democratization in Slovakia and Croatia. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, Vol. 13, Issue. 1, p. 1.


Geographic Diffusion and the Transformation of the Postcommunist World

  • Jeffrey S. Kopstein (a1) and David A. Reilly (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 June 2011

Since the collapse of communism the states of postcommunist Europe and Asia have defined for themselves, and have had defined for them, two primary tasks: the construction of viable market economies and the establishment of working institutions of representative democracy. The variation in political and economic outcomes in the postcommunist space makes it, without question, the most diverse “region” in the world. What explains the variation? All of the big winners of postcommunism share the trait of being geographically close to the former border of the noncommunist world. Even controlling for cultural differences, historical legacies, and paths of extrication, the spatial effect remains consistent and strong across the universe of postcommunist cases. This suggests the spatially dependent nature of the diffusion of norms, resources, and institutions that are necessary to the construction of political democracies and market economies in the postcommunist era. The authors develop and adduce evidence for the spatial dependence hypothesis, test it against rival hypotheses, and illustrate the relationships at work through three theoretically important case studies.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Joel S. Hellman , “Winners Take All: The Politics of Partial Reform in Postcommunist Transitions,” World Politics 50 (January 1998)

Jeffrey S. Kopstein and David A. Reilly , “Explaining the Why of the Why: A Comment on Fish's ‘Determinants of Economic Reform in the Post-Communist World,’” East European Politics and Societies 13, no. 3 (1999), 613–26

Keith Jaggers and Ted R. Gurr , “Tracking Democracy's Third Wave with the Polity III Data,” Journal of Peace Research 32, no. 2 (1995)

Michael Stohl , “State Violation of Human Rights: Issues and Problems of Measurement,” Human Rights Quarterly 8, no. 1 (1986), 592606

R. Koopmans , “The Dynamics of Protest Waves: West Germany, 1965 to 1989,” American Sociological Review 58 (1993)

Ray Barrell and Nigel Pain , “Foreign Direct Investment, Technological Change, and Economic Growth within Europe,” Economic Journal 107, no. 445 (1997)

Jonathon Eaton and Samuel S. Kortum , “International Technology Diffusion: Theory and Measurement,” International Economic Review 40, no. 3 (1999)

John O'Loughlin , Colin Flint , Luc Anselin , “The Geography of the Nazi Vote: Context, Confession, and Class in the Reichstag Election of 1930,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 84, no. 2 (1994)

Saul B. Cohen , “Global Geopolitical Change in the Post-Cold War Era,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 81, no. 2 (1991)

M. Steven Fish , “Mongolia: Democracy without Prerequisites,” Journal of Democracy 9, no. 3 (1998)

Rudolf Tokes , “Party Politics and Participation in Postcommunist Hungary,” in Karen Dawisha and Bruce Parrott , eds., The Consolidation of Democracy in East-Central Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997)

Eugene Huskey , “Kyrgyzstan: The Fate of Political Liberalization,” in Karen Dawisha and Bruce Parrott , eds., Conflict, Cleavage, and Change in Central Asia and the Caucasus (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997)

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

World Politics
  • ISSN: 0043-8871
  • EISSN: 1086-3338
  • URL: /core/journals/world-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *