Skip to main content

The Logic of Party Collusion in a Democracy: Evidence from Mali

  • Jessica Gottlieb

A credible opposition is necessary for democratic accountability. However, in a multiparty democracy, a credible opposition may fail to emerge when it is in the strategic interest of political parties to collude rather than compete, effectively extinguishing all credible opposition. The author argues that illicit collusion among parties on a representative council is more likely when all viable parties win seats and are thus able to enter into a self-binding commitment to jointly engage in misconduct without risk of exposure. Conversely, when at least one party fails to win representation on the council, there is a credible opposition with the incentive and ability to threaten exposure of rent seeking among council members. The theory is tested using a regression discontinuity design where the electoral threshold to win a single seat is, within a narrow band, an exogenous determinant of whether or not there is an out-party or credible opposition. Exploiting the fact that Mali's decentralization produces within-country variation in both electoral and governance outcomes, the author uses data from commune council elections alongside local-level public goods provision as a measure of rent seeking. Poorer public goods provision is indeed more likely when all political parties in a district win seats on the council. To show that collusion is the mechanism driving this relationship, the author tests several observable implications in the data and uses qualitative evidence as illustration. This examination of when it is in the strategic interest of parties to engage in uncompetitive behavior contributes to the literature on when elections fail to produce democratic accountability.

Hide All

* I would like to thank the three anonymous reviewers for constructive advice. For helpful comments on previous versions of this work, I thank James Fearon, Beatriz Magaloni, Jeremy Weinstein, Saumitra Jha, Katherine Casey, Jonathan Wand, Eric Kramon, Amanda Robinson, and Adrienne LeBas, as well as members of the Working Group on African Political Economy and participants in the Stanford Comparative Politics Workshop. For freely sharing data and answering questions about it, I am especially grateful to three agencies in Mali and the statisticians who work for them: the Agence Nationale d'Investissement des Collectivités Territoriales, Observatoire du Développement Humain Durable, and Direction National des Collectivités Territoriales. I thank Sidi Zeda and Abdoul Razak Sangaré for superb research assistance in the field. Generous support for this field research was provided by the Center for African Studies at, Stanford University. All errors are my own.

** Quote from Malian writer Moussa Konaté in Jeune Afrique, March 23, 2012, translated by the author. Available at

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

World Politics
  • ISSN: 0043-8871
  • EISSN: 1086-3338
  • URL: /core/journals/world-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 95 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 398 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th March 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.