Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 152
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Apolte, Thomas 2016. Gordon Tullock’s theory of revolution and dictatorship. Constitutional Political Economy, Vol. 27, Issue. 2, p. 158.


    Beger, Andreas Dorff, Cassy L. and Ward, Michael D. 2016. Irregular leadership changes in 2014: Forecasts using ensemble, split-population duration models. International Journal of Forecasting, Vol. 32, Issue. 1, p. 98.


    Cheng, Edmund W. 2016. Street Politics in a Hybrid Regime: The Diffusion of Political Activism in Post-colonial Hong Kong. The China Quarterly, Vol. 226, p. 383.


    Colgan, Jeff D. and R. Lucas, Edward 2016. Revolutionary Pathways: Leaders and the International Impacts of Domestic Revolutions. International Interactions, p. 1.


    Croke, Kevin 2016. Tools of single party hegemony in Tanzania: evidence from surveys and survey experiments. Democratization, p. 1.


    Frye, Timothy Gehlbach, Scott Marquardt, Kyle L. and Reuter, Ora John 2016. Is Putin’s popularity real?. Post-Soviet Affairs, p. 1.


    Gehlbach, Scott Sonin, Konstantin and Svolik, Milan W. 2016. Formal Models of Nondemocratic Politics. Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 19, Issue. 1, p. 565.


    Kalinin, Kirill 2016. The social desirability bias in autocrat's electoral ratings: evidence from the 2012 Russian presidential elections. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, Vol. 26, Issue. 2, p. 191.


    Lang, J.C. and De Sterck, H. 2016. A hierarchy of linear threshold models for the spread of political revolutions on social networks. Journal of Complex Networks, p. cnv030.


    Lawrence, Adria K. 2016. Repression and Activism among the Arab Spring’s First Movers: Evidence from Morocco’s February 20th Movement. British Journal of Political Science, p. 1.


    Lemos, Carlos Lopes, Rui Jorge and Coelho, Helder 2016. On Legitimacy Feedback Mechanisms in Agent-Based Modeling of Civil Violence. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, Vol. 31, Issue. 2, p. 106.


    Lowrance, Sherry 2016. Was the Revolution Tweeted? Social Media and the Jasmine Revolution in Tunisia. Digest of Middle East Studies, Vol. 25, Issue. 1, p. 155.


    Morgenbesser, Lee 2016. The autocratic mandate: elections, legitimacy and regime stability in Singapore. The Pacific Review, p. 1.


    von Soest, Christian and Grauvogel, Julia 2016. Politics and Legitimacy in Post-Soviet Eurasia.


    Wallace, Jeremy L. 2016. Juking the Stats? Authoritarian Information Problems in China. British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 46, Issue. 01, p. 11.


    Welzel, Christian Inglehart, Ronald and Kruse, Stefan 2016. Pitfalls in the Study of Democratization: Testing the Emancipatory Theory of Democracy. British Journal of Political Science, p. 1.


    Ash, Konstantin 2015. The election trap: the cycle of post-electoral repression and opposition fragmentation in Lukashenko's Belarus. Democratization, Vol. 22, Issue. 6, p. 1030.


    Aslam, Ghazia Grandvoinnet, Helene Plummer, Janelle Gandhi, Jennifer and Van Wicklin, Warren 2015. Opening the Black Box: The Contextual Drivers of Social Accountability.


    Athukorala, Prema-chandra and Jayasuriya, Sisira 2015. Victory in War and Defeat in Peace: Politics and Economics of Post-Conflict Sri Lanka*. Asian Economic Papers, Vol. 14, Issue. 3, p. 22.


    Berman, Eli and Matanock, Aila M. 2015. The Empiricists' Insurgency. Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 18, Issue. 1, p. 443.


    ×

Now out of Never: The Element of Surprise in the East European Revolution of 1989

  • Timur Kuran (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2010422
  • Published online: 01 June 2011
Abstract

Like many major revolutions in history, the East European Revolution of 1989 caught its leaders, participants, victims, and observers by surprise. This paper offers an explanation whose crucial feature is a distinction between private and public preferences. By suppressing their antipathies to the political status quo, the East Europeans misled everyone, including themselves, as to the possibility of a successful uprising. In effect, they conferred on their privately despised governments an aura of invincibility. Under the circumstances, public opposition was poised to grow explosively if ever enough people lost their fear of exposing their private preferences. The currently popular theories of revolution do not make clear why uprisings easily explained in retrospect may not have been anticipated. The theory developed here fills this void. Among its predictions is that political revolutions will inevitably continue to catch the world by surprise.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Baruch Fischhoff and Ruth Beyth , “‘I Knew It Would Happen’—Remembered Probabilities of Once-Future Things,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 13 (February 1975), 116

Tismaneanu, “Personal Power and Political Crisis in Romania,” Government and Opposition 24 (Spring 1989), 193

Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman , “Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability,” Cognitive Psychology 5 (September 1973), 207

James C. Davies , “Toward a Theory of Revolution,” American Sociological Review 27 (February 1962), 519

Timur Kuran , “Private and Public Preferences,” Economics and Philosophy 6 (April 1990), 126

Timur Kuran , “Spark and Prairie Fires: A Theory of Unanticipated Political Revolution,” Public Choice 61 (Aprf 1989), 4174

“Threshold Models of Collective Behavior,” American Journal of Sociology 83 (May 1978), 1420

Steven E. Finkel , Edward N. Muller , and Karl Dieter Opp, “Personal Influence, Collective Rationality, and Mass Political Action,” American Polit-al teence Review 83 (September 1989), 885903

Barrington Moore Jr., Injustice: The Social Bases of Obedience and Revolt (White Plains, N.Y.:M. E. Sharpe, 1978

Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman , “The Framing [of Decisions and the Rationality of Choice,” Science 211 (January 1981), 453

Elizabeth Teague , “Perestroika and the Soviet Worker,” Government and Opposition 25 (Spring 1990), 192

Said Amir Arjomand , “Iran's Islamic Revolution in Comparative Perspective,” World Politics 38 (April 1986), 383414

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

World Politics
  • ISSN: 0043-8871
  • EISSN: 1086-3338
  • URL: /core/journals/world-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×