Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Partition as a Solution to Ethnic War: An Empirical Critique of the Theoretical Literature

  • Nicholas Sambanis (a1)

Theorists of ethnic conflict have argued that the physical separation of warring ethnic groups may be the only possible solution to civil war. They argue that without territorial partition and, if necessary, forced population movements the war cannot end and genocide is likely. Other scholars have counterargued that partition only replaces internal war with international war, that it creates undemocratic successor states, and that it generates tremendous human suffering. This debate has so far been informed by very few important case studies. This article uses a new data set on civil wars to identify the main determinants of war-related partitions and estimate their impact on democratization, on the probability that war will recur, and on low-level ethnic violence. This is the first large-N quantitative analysis of this topic, testing the propositions of partition theory and weighing heavily on the side of its critics. Most assertions of partition theorists fail to pass rigorous empirical tests. The article also identifies some determinants of democratization after civil war, as well as the determinants of recurring ethnic violence. These empirical findings are used to formulate an alternative proposal for ending ethnic violence.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Chaim Kaufmann , “Possible and Impossible Solutions to Ethnic Civil Wars,” International Security 20 (Spring 1996)

Robert Jervis , “Cooperation under the Security Dilemma,” World Politics 30 (January 1978).

Barry Posen , “The Security Dilemma and Ethnic Conflict,” Survival 35 (Spring 1993).

Daniel L. Byman , “Divided They Stand: Lessons about Partition from Iraq and Lebanon,” Security Studies 7 (Autumn 1997).

Barbara F. Walter , “The Critical Barrier to Civil War Settlement,” International Organization 51 (Summer 1997).

Radha Kumar , “The Troubled History of Partition,” Foreign Affairs 76 (January-February 1997).

David A. Lake and Donald Rothchild , “Containing Fear: The Origins and Management of Ethnic Conflict,International Security 21 (Fall 1996)

Geoffrey Blainey , The Causes of War (New York: Free Press, 1973)

James Fearon , “Rationalist Explanations for War,” International Organization 49 (Summer 1995).

David Mason and Patrick Fett , “How Civil Wars End: A Rational Choice Approach,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 40 (December 1996)

J. Hausman , “Specification Tests in Econometrics,” Econometrica 46 (1978), 1251–71.

D. Rivers and Q. Vuong , “Limited Information Estimators and Exogeneity Tests for Simultaneous Probit Models,” Journal of Econometrics 39 (1988).

Kenneth A. Bollen , D. K. Guilkey , and T. A. Mroz , “Binary Outcomes and Endogenous Explanatory Variables: Tests and Solutions with an Application to the Demand for Contraceptive Use in Tunisia,” Demography 32 (February 1995).

Jeffrey Herbst , “Responding to State Failure in Africa,” International Security 21 (Winter 1996–97).

G. Tauchen , “Diagnostic Testing and Evaluation of Maximum Likelihood Models,” Journal of Econometrics 30 (1985).

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

World Politics
  • ISSN: 0043-8871
  • EISSN: 1086-3338
  • URL: /core/journals/world-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 72 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 710 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.