Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 10
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Heerkens, Jasper L. T. Delezie, Evelyne Kempen, Ine Zoons, Johan Ampe, Bart Rodenburg, T. Bas and Tuyttens, Frank A. M. 2015. Specific characteristics of the aviary housing system affect plumage condition, mortality and production in laying hens. Poultry Science, Vol. 94, Issue. 9, p. 2008.


    Matheson, Stephanie M. Donbavand, Jo Sandilands, Victoria Pennycott, Tom and Turner, Simon P. 2015. An ethological approach to determining housing requirements of gamebirds in raised laying units. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, Vol. 165, p. 17.


    Petrik, Mike T. Guerin, Michele T. and Widowski, Tina M. 2015. On-farm comparison of keel fracture prevalence and other welfare indicators in conventional cage and floor-housed laying hens in Ontario, Canada. Poultry Science, Vol. 94, Issue. 4, p. 579.


    Kasperbauer, T. J. 2013. Nussbaum and the Capacities of Animals. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, Vol. 26, Issue. 5, p. 977.


    Shields, Sara and Greger, Michael 2013. Animal Welfare and Food Safety Aspects of Confining Broiler Chickens to Cages. Animals, Vol. 3, Issue. 2, p. 386.


    Hannah, J. F. Wilson, J. L. Cox, N. A. Richardson, L. J. Cason, J. A. Bourassa, D. V. and Buhr, R. J. 2011. Horizontal Transmission of Salmonella and Campylobacter Among Caged and Cage-Free Laying Hens. Avian Diseases, Vol. 55, Issue. 4, p. 580.


    Van Hoorebeke, S. Van Immerseel, F. Haesebrouck, F. Ducatelle, R. and Dewulf, J. 2011. The Influence of the Housing System on Salmonella Infections in Laying Hens: A Review. Zoonoses and Public Health, Vol. 58, Issue. 5, p. 304.


    Shimmura, T. Hirahara, S. Azuma, T. Suzuki, T. Eguchi, Y. Uetake, K. and Tanaka, T. 2010. Multi-factorial investigation of various housing systems for laying hens. British Poultry Science, Vol. 51, Issue. 1, p. 31.


    Sandilands, V. Moinard, C. and Sparks, N.H.C. 2009. Providing laying hens with perches: fulfilling behavioural needs but causing injury?. British Poultry Science, Vol. 50, Issue. 4, p. 395.


    D’Eath, Richard B. and Keeling, Linda J. 2003. Social discrimination and aggression by laying hens in large groups: from peck orders to social tolerance. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, Vol. 84, Issue. 3, p. 197.


    ×

The pros and cons of cages

  • Ian J. H. Duncan (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/WPS20010027
  • Published online: 01 September 2007
Abstract

The main advantages of battery cages for laying hens over alternative husbandry systems are (1) increased hygiene resulting in a much lower incidence of diseases in which the infectious agent is spread through the droppings, (2) small group size resulting in a low incidence of social friction, (3) ease of management, (4) absence of litter problems, (5) better working conditions, and (6) a much lower cost of production. The disadvantages are (1) lack of physical and psychological space for the hens, (2) lack of exercise resulting in a higher incidence of metabolic disorders, (3) lack of nesting opportunities resulting in severe frustration for many birds each time an egg is laid, (4) lack of dust bathing opportunities which, although not a severe disadvantage, should still be charged to cages, (5) lack of other behavioural opportunities which again seem not to be a severe disadvantage and which await further elucidation, and (6) a higher incidence of foot lesions.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

J.R. Bareham (1976) A comparison of the behaviour and production of laying hens in experimental and conventional battery cages. Applied Animal Ethology 2: 291303

H.J. Blokhuis (1983) The relevance of sleep in poultry. World's Poultry Science Joiirnal 39: 3337

H.J. Blokhuis (1984) Rest in poultry. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 12: 289303

N.E. Collias , E.C. Collias , D. Hunsaker and L. Minning (1966) Locality fixation, mobility and social organization within an unconfined population of Red Jungle Fowl. Animal Behaviour 14: 550559

M.S. Dawkins (1981) Priorities in the cage size and flooring preferences of domestic hens. British Poultry Science 22: 255263

M.S. Dawkins (1982) Elusive concept of preferred group size in domestic hens. Applied Animal Ethology 8: 365375

M.S. Dawkins (1985) Cage height preference and use in battery-kept hens. Veterinary Record 116: 345347

M.S. Dawkins (1989) Time budgets in red jungle fowl as a basis for the assessment of welfare in domestic fowl. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 24: 7780

M.S. Dawkins and S. Hardie (1989) Space needs of laying hens. British Poultry Science 30: 413416

I.J.H. Duncan (1998) Behavior and behavioral needs. Poulty Science 77: 17661772

I.J.H. Duncan and V.G. Kite (1987) Some investigations into motivation in the domestic fowl. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 18: 387388

I.J.H. Duncan and V.G. Kite (1989) Nest site selection and nest building behaviour in domestic fowl. Animal Behaviour 37: 215231

I.J.H. Duncan , T.M. Widowski , A.E. Malleau , A.C. Lindberg and J.C. Petherick (1998) External factors and causation of dustbathing in domestic hens. Behavioural Processes 43: 219228

C.M. Hann (1980) Some system definitions and characteristics. In: The Laying Hen and its Environment (R. Moss , Ed.), Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, pp. 239250

B.O. Hughes (1977) Selection of group size by individual laying hens. British Poultry Science 18: 918

B.O. Hughes and M.C. Appleby (1989) Increase of bone strength of spent laying hens housed in modified cages with perches. Veterinary Record 124: 483484

L.J. Keeling and I.J.H. Duncan (1989) Interindividual distances and orientation in laying hens housed in groups of three in two different sized enclosures. Applied Animal Behuviour Science 24: 325342

A.C. Lindberg and C.J. Nicol (1996) Space and density effects on group size preferences in laying hens. British Poultry Science 37: 709721

M.M. Mashaly , M.L. Webb , S.L. Youtz , W.B. Roush and H.B. Graves (1984) Changes in serum corticosterone concentration of laying hens as a response to increased population density. Poultry Science 63: 22712274

G. McBride , I.P. Parer and F. Foenander (1969) The social organization and behaviour of the feral domestic fowl. Animal Behaviour Monographs 2: 125181

A.D. Mills , D.G.M. Wood-Gush and B.O. Hughes (1985a) Genetic analysis of strain differences in pre-laying behaviour in battery cages. British Poultry Science 26: 182197

A.D. Mills , I.J.H. Duncan , G.S. Slee and J.S.B. Clark (1985b) Heart rate and laying behaviour in two strains of domestic chicken. Physiology and Behaviour 35: 145147

C.J. Nicol (1987a) Effect of cage height and area on the behaviour of hens housed in battery cages. British Poultry Science 28: 327335

C.J. Nicol (1987b) Behavioural responses of laying hens following a period of spatial restriction. Animal Behaviour 35: 17091719

C. Riddell , C.F. Helmboldt , E.P. Singson and L.D. Matterson (1968) Bone pathology of birds affected with cage layer fatigue. Avian Diseases 12: 285297

L.O. Rowland , J.L. Fry , R.B. Christmas , A.W. Osheen and R.H. Harris (1972) Differences in tibia strength and bone ash among strains of layers. Poultry Science 51: 16121615

C.J. Savory , D.G.M. Wood-Gush and I.J.H. Duncan (1978) Feeding behaviour in a population of domestic fowls in the wild. Applied Animal Ethology 4: 1327

K. Vestergaard (1980) The regulation of dustbathing and other behaviour patterns in the layinghen: a Lorenzian approach. In: The Laying Hen and its Environment (R. Moss , Ed.), Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, pp.101120

K. Vestergaard (1982) Dust-bathing in the domestic fowl diurnal rhythm and dust deprivation. Applied Animal Ethology 8: 487495

K. Vestergaard , J.A. Hogan and J.P. Kruijt (1990) The development of a behaviour system: dustbathing in the Burmese red junglefowl. I. The influence of the rearing environment on the organization of dustbathing. Behaviour 112: 3552

T.M. Widowski and I.J.H. Duncan (2000) Working for a dustbath are hens increasing pleasure rather than reducing suffering? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 68: 3953

D.G.M. Wood-Gush (1972) Strain differences in response to sub-optimal stimuli in the fowl. Animal Behaviour 20: 7276

D.G.M. Wood-Gush and A.B. Gilbert (1964) The control of the nesting behaviour of the domestic hen. II. The role of the ovary. Animal Behaviour 12: 451453

D.G.M. Wood-Gush and A.B. Gilbert (1973) Some hormones involved in the nesting behaviour of hens. Ainimal Behaviour 21: 98103

R. Zayan and J. Doyen (1985) Spacing patterns of laying hens kept at different densities in battery cages. In: Social Space for Domestic Animals (R. Zayan , Ed.), Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, pp. 3770

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

World's Poultry Science Journal
  • ISSN: 0043-9339
  • EISSN: 1743-4777
  • URL: /core/journals/world-s-poultry-science-journal
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: