Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T11:27:41.778Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy by Dani Rodrik New York: Norton, 2011

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2011

Simon Lester
Simon Lester
Affiliation:
Worldtradelaw.net
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
World Trade Review , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , July 2011 , pp. 409 - 417
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barfield, Claude (2001), Free Trade, Sovereignty, Democracy: The Future of the World Trade Organization, AEI Press.Google Scholar
Bown, Chad (2004), ‘On the Economic Success of GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(3): 811–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davey, William (2006), ‘The WTO: Looking Forwards’, Journal of International Economic Law, 9(1): 18–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durling, James (2003), ‘Deference, But Only When Due: WTO Review of Anti-Dumping Measures’, Journal of International Economic Law, 6(1): 125–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehring, Lothar (2002), ‘De Facto Discrimination in World Trade Law: National and Most-Favoured-Nation-Treatment or Equal Treatment?’, Journal of World Trade, 36(5): 921–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudec, Robert (1993), Enforcing International Trade Law: The Evolution of the Modern GATT Legal System, Butterworth.Google Scholar
Hudec, Robert (1998), ‘GATT/WTO Constraints on National Regulation: Requiem for An Aims and Effects Test’, The International Lawyer, 32: 619–649.Google Scholar
Posner, Eric and Yoo, John (2005), ‘Judicial Independence in International Tribunals’, California Law Review, 93(1): 46–51.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani (2007), ‘How to Save Globalization from its Cheerleaders’, September 2007, KSG Working Paper No. RWP07-038.Google Scholar
Porges, Amelia and Trachtman, Joel (2003), ‘Robert Hudec and Domestic Regulation: The Resurrection of “Aim and Effects”’, Journal of World Trade, 37(4): 783–799.Google Scholar
WTO Tariff Profile of China, http://stat.wto.org/TariffProfile/WSDBTariffPFView.aspx?Language=E&Country=CNGoogle Scholar
WTO Tarff Data for China, http://stat.wto.org/idbdata/idb_chn_last_e.zipGoogle Scholar
WTO/ITC/UNCTAD, (World Tariff Profiles 2010.Google Scholar