Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Trade and Agricultural Disease: Import Restrictions in the Wake of the India–Agricultural Products Dispute

  • KAMAL SAGGI (a1) and MARK WU (a2)

Trade in agricultural products raises sensitivities, particularly when imports originate from a trading partner experiencing an outbreak of some type of agricultural disease. In this article, we explain why despite the negative externalities associated with diseased imports, an importing country is generally not permitted to ban such imports outright under WTO law. Rather, it is allowed to do so only under specific circumstances. We also highlight how the recent India–Agricultural Products ruling contributes to the jurisprudence of two issues concerning the SPS Agreement: the interpretation of international standards, and the relationship between the risk assessment and scientific evidence requirements.

Corresponding author
Hide All
Bhagwati J. and Ramaswami V. K. (1963), ‘Domestic Distortions, Tariffs, and the Theory of Optimum Subsidy’, Journal of Political Economy, 71(1): 4450.
Bown C. and Hillman J. A. (2016), ‘Bird Flu, the OIE, and National Regulation: The WTO's India – Agricultural Products Dispute’, World Trade Review, 15(2): 235257.
Grossman G. and Helpman E. (1995), ‘Protection for Sale’, American Economic Review, 84(4): 833850.
Margolis M., Shogren J. F., and Fischer C. (2005), ‘How Trade Politics Affect Invasive Species Control’, Ecological Economics, 52(3): 305313.
McAusland C. and Costello C. (2004), ‘Avoiding Invasives: Trade Related Policies for Controlling Unintentional Exotic Species Introductions’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 48(2): 954977.
McLachlan C. (2005), ‘The Principle of Systemic Integration and Article 31(3)(C) of the Vienna Convention’, International Comparative Law Quarterly, 53: 279320.
Nedumpara J., Chandra A., and Deepak G. (2016), ‘ India – Agricultural Products: Defending India's First SPS Dispute’, in Das A. and Nedumpara J. (eds.), WTO Dispute Settlement at Twenty: Insiders’ Reflections on India's Participation, New Delhi: Centre for WTO Studies & Springer.
Olson L. J. and Roy S. (2010), ‘Dynamic Sanitary and Phytosanitary Trade Policy’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 60: 2130.
Paarlberg P. L. and Lee J. G. (1998), ‘Import Restrictions in the Presence of a Health Risk: An Illustration Using FMD’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80(1): 175183.
Robinson T. et al. (2011), Global Livestock Production Systems, Rome: Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations and International Livestock Research Institute.
Rodrik D. (2011), The Globalization Paradox, New York, W. W. Norton.
Salve P. (2014) ‘How Many Farmers Does India Really Have’, Hindustan Times, 11 August 2014.
Wilson N. L. W. and Anton J. (2006), ‘Combining Risk Assessment and Economics in Managing a Sanitary-Phytosanitary Risk’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88(1): 194202.
World Trade Organization (2015), International Trade Statistics 2015.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

World Trade Review
  • ISSN: 1474-7456
  • EISSN: 1475-3138
  • URL: /core/journals/world-trade-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 92 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 237 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 10th March 2017 - 23rd October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.