Skip to main content
×
×
Home

United States – Anti-Dumping Measures on Oil Country Tubular Goods (OCTG) from Mexico: a legal-economic assessment of sunset reviews

  • CHAD P. BOWN (a1) and JASPER WAUTERS (a2)
Abstract

This paper reviews the WTO Appellate Body Report on United States – Anti-Dumping Measures on Oil Country Tubular Goods (OCTG) from Mexico (WT/DS282/AB/R 2 November 2005). This dispute concerns the disciplines imposed by the Anti-Dumping Agreement on WTO Members seeking to extend their anti-dumping measures beyond the original five-year period through a so-called sunset review. Our analysis focuses on the Appellate Body's finding in this case that no causation analysis is required in sunset reviews, and addresses the AB's approach towards the legal instrument that provides for the US policy in terms of sunset reviews, the Sunset Policy Bulletin. We conclude that the Anti-Dumping Agreement, as interpreted by the Appellate Body in this and other similar cases, imposes only minimal disciplines of a general nature on Members wishing to extend the anti-dumping measure beyond its original five-year period. We argue that the ‘textual’ argument relied on to support this deferential approach is weak and has resulted in undermining the practical effect of, what was considered to be, one of the major achievements of the Uruguay Round Anti-Dumping Agreement: limiting the life span of an anti-dumping measure to five years. From an economic perspective, Panels and the Appellate Body are simply debating the wrong type of questions. The prospective nature required by a sunset review analysis raises questions such as why exporters engaged in dumping in the first place, and what the conditions of the industry were so that the dumped imports caused injury. At the moment, sunset reviews seem adrift as panels and the Appellate Body fail to give guidance to Members on how to do a more economically sound and informed review.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      United States – Anti-Dumping Measures on Oil Country Tubular Goods (OCTG) from Mexico: a legal-economic assessment of sunset reviews
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      United States – Anti-Dumping Measures on Oil Country Tubular Goods (OCTG) from Mexico: a legal-economic assessment of sunset reviews
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      United States – Anti-Dumping Measures on Oil Country Tubular Goods (OCTG) from Mexico: a legal-economic assessment of sunset reviews
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
Blonigen, Bruce A. and Ohno, Yuka (1998), ‘Endogenous Protection, Foreign Direct Investment, and Protection-Building Trade’, Journal of International Economics, 46: 205227.
Blonigen, Bruce A. and Park, Jee-Hyeong (2004), ‘Dynamic Pricing in the Presence of Anti-dumping Policy: Theory and Evidence’, American Economic Review, 94: 134154.
Cadot, Olivier, de Melo, Jaime, and Tumurchudur, Bolormaa (2007), ‘Anti-Dumping Sunset Reviews: The Uneven Reach of WTO Disciplines’, University of Geneva manuscript, February.
Durling, James P. and McCullough, Matthew P. (2004), ‘Teaching Old Laws New Tricks: The Legal Obligation of Non-Attribution and the Need for Economic Rigor in Injury Analyses under US Trade Law’, in Hartigan, James and Choi, E. Kwan (eds) Handbook of International Trade, Vol. II, New York: Blackwell.
Francois, Joseph and Hall, Keith (1993), ‘COMPAS: Commercial Policy Analysis System’, US International Trade Commission, May.
Grossman, Gene M. (1986), ‘Imports as a Cause of Injury: The Case of the US Steel Industry’, Journal of International Economics, 20: 201223.
Gupta, Poonam and Panagariya, Arvind (2006), ‘Injury Investigations in Antidumping and the Super-Additivity Effect: A Theoretical Explanation’, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv/Review of World Economics, 142: 151164.
Hansen, Wendy L. and Prusa, Thomas J. (1996), ‘Cumulation and ITC Decision-Making: The Sum of the Parts is Greater Than the Whole’, Economic Inquiry, 34: 746769.
Howse, Robert and Staiger, Robert W. (2006), ‘United States – Sunset Review of Anti-Dumping Duties on Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products From Japan: A Legal and Economic Analysis of the Appellate Body Ruling’, in Mavroidis, Petros C. and Horn, Henrik (eds) The WTO Case Law of 2003, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Irwin, Douglas A. (2003), ‘Causing Problems? The WTO Review of Causation and Injury Attribution in US Section 201 Cases’, World Trade Review, 2: 297325.
Kelly, Kenneth (1988), ‘The Analysis of Causality in Escape Clause Cases’, The Journal of Industrial Economics, 37: 187207.
Moore, Michael O. (2006), ‘An Econometric Analysis of US Antidumping Sunset Review Decisions’, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv/Review of World Economics, 142: 122150.
Pindyck, Robert S. and Rotemberg, Julio J. (1987), ‘Are Imports to Blame? Attribution of Injury under the 1974 Trade Act’, Journal of Law and Economics, 30: 101122.
Prusa, Thomas J. and Sharp, David C. (2001), ‘Simultaneous Equations in Antidumping Investigations’, Journal of Forensic Economics, 14: 6378.
Tharakan, P. K. M., Greenaway, D., and Tharakan, J. (1998), ‘Cumulation and Injury Determination of the European Community in Antidumping Cases’, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv/Review of World Economics, 134: 320339.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

World Trade Review
  • ISSN: 1474-7456
  • EISSN: 1475-3138
  • URL: /core/journals/world-trade-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 29 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 488 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 26th September 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.