Bhagwati Jagdish. 1981. Import Competition and Response. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Deardorff Alan. 1987. Safeguards Policy and the Conservative Social Welfare Function. In Kierzkowski Henryk, Protection and Competition in International Trade: Essays in Honor ofW. M. Corden. Blackwell: Oxford.
Dixit Avinash. 1987. Trade and Insurance with Moral Hazard. Journal of International Economics, 23: 201–20.
Dixit Avinash. 1989a. Trade and Insurance with Imperfectly Observed Outcomes. Quarterly Journal of Economics, February: 195–203. 1989b. Trade and Insurance with Adverse Selection. Review of Economic Studies, 56: 235–48.
Eaton Jonathan and Grossman Gene. 1985. Tariff as Insurance: Optimal Commercial Policy when Domestic Markets are Incomplete. Canadian Journal of Economics, 18: 258–72.
Grossman Gene. 1986. Imports as a Cause of Injury: the Case of the U.S. Steel Industry. Journal ofInternational Economics 121.
Irwin Douglas A. 2002. Causing Problems? The WTO Review of Causation and Injury Attribution in U.S. Section 201 Cases. Mimeo.
Kelly Kenneth. 1988. The Analysis of Causality in Escape Clause Cases. Journal of Industrial Economics, 37: 187–207.
Mussa Michael. 1981. Government Policy and the Adjustment Process. Pp. 73–120 in Bhagwati Jagdish, Import Competition and Response. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Neary Peter. 1981. Inter-Sectoral Capital Mobility, Wage Stickiness, and the Case for Adjustment Assistance. Pp. 39–67 in Bhagwati Jagdish, Import Competition and Response. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Newbery David M. G. and Stiglitz Joseph E.. 1981. The Theory of Commodity Price Stabilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pindyck Robert and Rotemberg Julio. 1987. Are Imports to Blame? Attribution of Injury under the 1974 Trade Act. Journal of Law and Economics, 30: 101–22.
Sykes Alan. 1990. GATT Safeguards Reform: the Injury Test. In Trebilcock Michael and York R., Fair Exchange: Reforming Trade Remedy Laws. Policy Study 11. C. D. Toronto: Howe Institute. 1991. Protectionism as a “Safeguard”: a Positive Analysis of GATT Article XIX with Normative Speculations. University ofChicago Law Review, Winter.