Skip to main content
×
Home

US – Lamb: United States – Safeguard Measures on Imports of Fresh, Chilled or Frozen Lamb Meat from New Zealand and Australia: What Should be Required of a Safeguard Investigation?*

Abstract

The United States (US) imposed, in July 1999, a safeguard on lamb meat, in the form of tariff rate import quotas, which were to be applied for a period of three years. The measure was based on findings by the US International Trade Commission that increased imports of lamb meat were a substantial cause of threat of serious injury to the US industry producing the like product. Following complaints by New Zealand and Australia that the measure was inconsistent with Articles I, II and XIX of GATT 1994, and several provisions of the Agreement on Safeguards, the World Trade Organization (WTO) Dispute Settlement Body established, in November 1999, a panel to review the consistency of the US measure with the mentioned WTO rules.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Bhagwati Jagdish. 1981. Import Competition and Response. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Deardorff Alan. 1987. Safeguards Policy and the Conservative Social Welfare Function. In Kierzkowski Henryk, Protection and Competition in International Trade: Essays in Honor ofW. M. Corden. Blackwell: Oxford.
Dixit Avinash. 1987. Trade and Insurance with Moral Hazard. Journal of International Economics, 23: 201–20.
Dixit Avinash. 1989a. Trade and Insurance with Imperfectly Observed Outcomes. Quarterly Journal of Economics, February: 195203. 1989b. Trade and Insurance with Adverse Selection. Review of Economic Studies, 56: 235–48.
Eaton Jonathan and Grossman Gene. 1985. Tariff as Insurance: Optimal Commercial Policy when Domestic Markets are Incomplete. Canadian Journal of Economics, 18: 258–72.
Grossman Gene. 1986. Imports as a Cause of Injury: the Case of the U.S. Steel Industry. Journal ofInternational Economics 121.
Irwin Douglas A. 2002. Causing Problems? The WTO Review of Causation and Injury Attribution in U.S. Section 201 Cases. Mimeo.
Kelly Kenneth. 1988. The Analysis of Causality in Escape Clause Cases. Journal of Industrial Economics, 37: 187207.
Mussa Michael. 1981. Government Policy and the Adjustment Process. Pp. 73120 in Bhagwati Jagdish, Import Competition and Response. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Neary Peter. 1981. Inter-Sectoral Capital Mobility, Wage Stickiness, and the Case for Adjustment Assistance. Pp. 3967 in Bhagwati Jagdish, Import Competition and Response. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Newbery David M. G. and Stiglitz Joseph E.. 1981. The Theory of Commodity Price Stabilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pindyck Robert and Rotemberg Julio. 1987. Are Imports to Blame? Attribution of Injury under the 1974 Trade Act. Journal of Law and Economics, 30: 10122.
Sykes Alan. 1990. GATT Safeguards Reform: the Injury Test. In Trebilcock Michael and York R., Fair Exchange: Reforming Trade Remedy Laws. Policy Study 11. C. D. Toronto: Howe Institute. 1991. Protectionism as a “Safeguard”: a Positive Analysis of GATT Article XIX with Normative Speculations. University ofChicago Law Review, Winter.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

World Trade Review
  • ISSN: 1474-7456
  • EISSN: 1475-3138
  • URL: /core/journals/world-trade-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 32 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 351 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 14th December 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.