Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T07:07:00.984Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analysis and computation of gravity-induced migration in porous media

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2011

R. DE LOUBENS
Affiliation:
Schlumberger-Doll Research Center, One Hampshire Street, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
T. S. RAMAKRISHNAN*
Affiliation:
Schlumberger-Doll Research Center, One Hampshire Street, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
*
Email address for correspondence: ramakrishnan@slb.com

Abstract

Motivated by the problem of gravity segregation in an inclined porous layer, we present a theoretical analysis of interface evolution between two immiscible fluids of unequal density and mobility, both in two and three dimensions. Applying perturbation theory to the appropriately scaled problem, we derive the governing equations for the pressure and interface height to leading order, obtained in the limit of a thin gravity tongue and a slightly dipping bed. According to the zeroth-order approximation, the pressure profile perpendicular to the bed is in equilibrium, a widely accepted assumption for this class of problems. We show that for the inclined bed two-dimensional problem, in the reference frame moving with the mean gravity-induced advection velocity, the interface motion is dictated by a degenerate parabolic equation, different from those previously published. In this case, the late-time behaviour of the gravity tongue can be derived analytically through a formal expansion of both the solution and its two moving boundaries. In three dimensions, using a moving coordinate along the dip direction, we obtain an elliptic–parabolic system of partial differential equations where the fluid pressure and interface height are the two dependent variables. Although analytical results are not available for this case, the evolution of the gravity tongue can be investigated by numerical computations in only two spatial dimensions. The solution features are identified for different combinations of dimensionless parameters, showing their respective influence on the shape and motion of the interface.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Present address: Total, avenue Larribau, 64018 Pau CEDEX, France.

References

REFERENCES

Barenblatt, G. I. 1996 Scaling, Self-Similarity, and Intermediate Asymptotics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bear, J. 1972 Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Doll, H. G. 1955 Filtrate invasion in highly permeable sands. The Petroleum Engineer, January.Google Scholar
Dussan, E. B. & Auzerais, F. M. 1993 Buoyancy-induced flow in porous media generated near a drilled oil well. Part 1. The accumulation of filtrate at a horizontal impermeable boundary. J. Fluid Mech. 254, 283311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farcas, A. & Woods, A. W. 2009 The effect of drainage on the capillary retention of CO2 in a layered permeable rock. J. Fluid Mech. 618, 349359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fayers, F. J. & Muggeridge, A. H. 1990 Extensions to Dietz theory and behavior of gravity tongues in slightly tilted reservoirs. SPE Reservoir Engineering 5, 487494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilding, B. H. 1977 Properties of solutions of an equation in the theory of infiltration. Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 65, 203225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilding, B. H. & Peletier, L. A. 1976 The Cauchy problem for an equation in the theory of infiltration. Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 61, 127140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grundy, R. E. 1983 Asymptotic solution of a model non-linear convective diffusion equation. IMA J. Appl. Math. 31, 121137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesse, M. A., Orr, F. M. Jr & Tchelepi, H. A. 2008 Gravity currents with residual trapping. J. Fluid Mech. 611, 3560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesse, M. A., Tchelepi, H. A., Cantwell, B. J. & Orr, F. M. Jr. 2007 Gravity currents in horizontal porous layers: transition from early to late self-similarity. J. Fluid Mech. 577, 363383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huppert, H. E. & Woods, A. W. 1995 Gravity-driven flows in porous layers. J. Fluid Mech. 292, 5569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juanes, R., MacMinn, C. W. & Szulczewski, M. L. 2010 The footprint of the CO2 plume during carbon dioxide storage in saline aquifers: storage efficiency for capillary trapping at the basin scale. Trans. Porous Med. 82, 1930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kevorkian, J. & Cole, J. D. 1981 Perturbation Methods in Applied Mathematics. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochina, I. N., Mikhailov, N. N. & Filinov, M. V. 1983 Groundwater mound damping. Intl J. Engng Sci. 21, 413421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurençot, P. & Simondon, F. 1998 Long-time behaviour for porous medium equations with convection. Proc. R. Soc. Edin. A 128, 315336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenoach, B., Ramakrishnan, T. S. & Thambynayagam, R. K. M. 2004 Transient flow of a compressible fluid in a connected layered permeable medium. Trans. Porous Med. 57, 153169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Loubens, R. & Ramakrishnan, T. S. 2011 Asymptotic solution of a nonlinear advection–diffusion equation. Q. Appl. Math. (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramakrishnan, T. S. 2007 On reservoir fluid-flow control with smart completions. SPE Prod. Oper. 22 (1), 412.Google Scholar
Sheldon, J. W. & Fayers, F. J. 1962 The motion of an interface between two fluids in a slightly dipping porous medium. Soc. Petrol. Engng J. 2, 275282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vella, D. & Huppert, H. E. 2006 Gravity currents in a porous medium at an inclined plane. J. Fluid Mech. 555, 353362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, A. W. & Farcas, A. 2009 Capillary entry pressure and the leakage of gravity currents through a sloping layered permeable rock. J. Fluid Mech. 618, 361379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yortsos, Y. C. 1995 A theoretical analysis of vertical flow equilibrium. Trans. Porous Med. 18 (2), 107129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar