Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T12:56:31.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quo vadis, Tommotian?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 November 2019

Dmitriy V. Grazhdankin*
Affiliation:
Precambrian Palaeontology and Stratigraphy Laboratory, Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics, Koptyuga 3, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia Earth Sciences Division, Novosibirsk State University, Pirogova 1, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
Vasiliy V. Marusin
Affiliation:
Precambrian Palaeontology and Stratigraphy Laboratory, Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics, Koptyuga 3, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia Earth Sciences Division, Novosibirsk State University, Pirogova 1, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
Olga P. Izokh
Affiliation:
Earth Sciences Division, Novosibirsk State University, Pirogova 1, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia Isotope Analytical Geochemistry Laboratory, Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, Koptyuga 3, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
Galina A. Karlova
Affiliation:
Precambrian Palaeontology and Stratigraphy Laboratory, Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics, Koptyuga 3, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
Boris B. Kochnev
Affiliation:
Precambrian Palaeontology and Stratigraphy Laboratory, Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics, Koptyuga 3, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia Earth Sciences Division, Novosibirsk State University, Pirogova 1, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
Georgiy E. Markov
Affiliation:
Precambrian Palaeontology and Stratigraphy Laboratory, Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics, Koptyuga 3, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
Konstantin E. Nagovitsin
Affiliation:
Precambrian Palaeontology and Stratigraphy Laboratory, Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics, Koptyuga 3, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia Earth Sciences Division, Novosibirsk State University, Pirogova 1, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
Zhiger Sarsembaev
Affiliation:
Precambrian Palaeontology and Stratigraphy Laboratory, Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics, Koptyuga 3, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia Earth Sciences Division, Novosibirsk State University, Pirogova 1, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
Sara Peek
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA Menlo Park Stable Isotope and Tritium Laboratories, United States Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA
Huan Cui
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA Research Group of Analytical, Environmental and Geo-Chemistry, Division of Earth System Science, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels 1050, Belgium ET-HOME (Evolution and Tracers of the Habitability of Mars and Earth) Astrobiology Research Consortium, Belgium
Alan J. Kaufman
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
*

Abstract

The concept of the Tommotian Regional Stage of the Siberian Platform has been closely linked to the idea of the ‘Cambrian Explosion’ of animals and protists when the entire Earth system shifted rapidly into Phanerozoic mode. We conducted a multidisciplinary study of an informal ‘synstratotype’ of the lower Tommotian boundary in the upper Mattaia Formation, Kessyusa Group in the Olenek Uplift, NE of the Siberian Platform. The Mattaia Formation characterizes an upper shoreface to inner-shelf depositional setting and provides important faunal ties and correlation with carbonate-dominated and aliminosiliciclastic open-shelf areas. A section of the upper Mattaia Formation at Boroulakh, Olenek River is suggested here as a model for the Global Boundary Stratotype Section and Point for the base of the Cambrian Stage 2. This level contains the lowermost occurrence of the cosmopolitan fossil helcionelloid mollusc Aldanella attleborensis. Section global markers near the base of the stage include a positive excursion of δ13C values reaching +5.4‰, a U–Pb zircon date of 529.7 ± 0.3 Ma, massive appearance of diverse small skeletal fossils (including Watsonella crosbyi), a sudden increase in diversity and abundance of trace fossils, as well as a conspicuous increase in depth and intensity of bioturbation. Coincidently, it is this level that has always been regarded as the lower Tommotian boundary on the Olenek Uplift.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arkell, WJ (1933) The Jurassic System in Great Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press, xii + 681 pp.Google Scholar
Astashkin, VA , Pegel, TV , Shabanov, YuYa , Sukhov, SS , Sundukov, VM , Repina, LN , Rozanov, AYu and Zhuravlev, AYu (1991) The Cambrian System on the Siberian Platform: Correlation Chart and Explanatory Notes. International Union of Geological Sciences Publication 27. Herdon: IUGS, 133 pp.Google Scholar
Babcock, LE, Peng, S, Zhu, M, Xiao, S and Ahlberg, P (2014) Proposed reassessment of the Cambrian GSSP. Journal of African Earth Sciences 98, 310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balini, M, Ferretti, A, Finney, S and Monechi, S (2017) The contribution of fossils to chronostratigraphy, 150 years after Albert Oppel. Lethaia 50, 323–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowring, SA, Grotzinger, JP, Isachsen, CE, Knoll, AH, Pelechaty, SM and Kolosov, P (1993) Calibrating rates of Early Cambrian evolution. Science 261, 1293–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brasier, MD, Khomentovsky, VV and Corfield, RM (1993) Stable isotopic calibration of the earliest skeletal fossil assemblages in eastern Siberia (Precambrian–Cambrian boundary). Terra Nova 5, 225–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brasier, MD, Rozanov, AYu, Zhuravlev, AYu, Corfield, RM and Derry, LA (1994) A carbon isotope reference scale for the Lower Cambrian succession in Siberia: report of IGCP Project 303. Geological Magazine 131, 767–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowie, JW (1978) I.U.G.S./I.G.C.P. Project 29 Precambrian-Cambrian Boundary Working group in Cambridge, 1978. Geological Magazine 115, 151–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowie, JW and Rozanov, AYu (1974) I.U.G.S. Precambrian/Cambrian Boundary Working Group in Siberia, 1973. Geological Magazine 111, 237–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowie, JW, Ziegler, W, Boucot, AJ, Bassett, MG and Remane, J (1986) Guidelines and statutes of the international commission on stratigraphy. Courier des Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 83, 114.Google Scholar
Demidenko, YuE and Parkhaev, PYu (2014) On the problem of recognition of the lower Tommotian boundary using the SSF. IGCP Project 591 Field Workshop 2014, Extended Summary, 2631 pp. Nanjing University Press, Nanjing, China.Google Scholar
Geyer, G and Shergold, JH (2000) The quest for internationally recognized divisions of Cambrian time. Episodes 23, 188–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grazhdankin, DV, Kontorovich, AE, Kontorovich, VA, Saraev, SV, Filippov, YuF, Efimov, AS, Karlova, GA, Kochnev, BB, Nagovitsin, KE, Terleev, AA and Fedyanin, GO (2015) Vendian of the Fore-Yenisei sedimentary basin (southeastern West Siberia). Russian Geology and Geophysics 56, 560–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gusev, AI (1950) The Geology, Coal- and Oil-Bearing Capacity in the Lower Reaches of the Olenek River. Leningrad, Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Glavsevmorputi, 100 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Hedberg, HD (1954) Procedure and terminology in stratigraphical classification. Congres Geologique International. Comptes rendus de la XIX Session, Alger 1952. Section XIII, 1, 205–33.Google Scholar
Hedberg, HD (1976) International Stratigraphic Guide. New York: Wiley & Sons, 200 pp.Google Scholar
Kaufman, AJ, Knoll, AH, Semikhatov, MA, Grotzinger, JP, Jacobsen, SB and Adams, W (1996) Integrated chronostratigraphy of Proterozoic-Cambrian boundary beds in the western Anabar region, northern Siberia. Geological Magazine 133, 509–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaufman, AJ, Peek, S, Martin, AJ, Cui, H, Grazhdankin, D, Rogov, V, Xiao, S, Buchwaldt, R and Bowring, S (2012) A shorter fuse for the Cambrian Explosion? Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs 44, 326.Google Scholar
Khomentovsky, VV (1976) The Vendian. Novosibirsk: Nauka, Siberian Branch, Transactions of the Institute of Geology and Geophysics no. 243, 271 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Khomentovsky, VV (1986) The Vendian System of Siberia and a standard stratigraphic scale. Geological Magazine 123, 333–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khomentovsky, VV and Karlova, GA (1992) Lower boundary of the Cambrian and its rationale in Siberia. Geologiya i Geofizika 11, 326 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Khomentovsky, VV and Karlova, GA (1993) Biostratigraphy of the Vendian-Cambrian beds and the lower Cambrian boundary in Siberia. Geological Magazine 130, 2945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khomentovsky, VV and Karlova, GA (1994) Ecological peculiarities of the Vendian–Cambrian small shelly fauna in the Siberian Platform. Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation 2, 206–15.Google Scholar
Khomentovsky, VV and Karlova, GA (2002) The boundary between Nemakit-Daldynian and Tommotian stages (Vendian–Cambrian Systems) of Siberia. Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation 10, 217–38.Google Scholar
Khomentovsky, VV and Karlova, GA (2005) The Tommotian Stage base as the Cambrian lower boundary in Siberia. Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation 13, 2134.Google Scholar
Khudoley, A, Chamberlain, K, Ershova, V, Sears, J, Prokopiev, A, MacLean, J, Kazakova, G, Malyshev, S, Molchanov, A, Kullerud, K, Toro, J, Miller, E, Veselovskiy, R, Li, A and Chipley, D (2015) Proterozoic supercontinental restorations: constraints from provenance studies of Mesoproterozoic to Cambrian clastic rocks, eastern Siberian Craton. Precambrian Research 259, 7894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirschvink, JL, Magaritz, M, Ripperdan, RL, Zhuravlev, AYu and Rozanov, AYu (1991) The Precambrian/Cambrian boundary: magnetostratigraphy and carbon isotopes resolve correlation problems between Siberia, Morocco, and South China. GSA Today 1, 6988.Google Scholar
Kir’yanov, VV (1987) A succession of acritarch assemblages in the Precambrian–Cambrian boundary strata on the East European and Siberian platforms. In Proceedings of Third All-Union Symposium on Precambrian and Early Cambrian Palaeontology, Petrozavodsk, 11–14 May 1987, Abstracts. Petrozavodsk, Karelian Branch of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, pp. 44–5 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Kir’yanov, VV (2006) Stratigraphy of the oldest Cambrian sediments of the East European and Siberian platforms. Heolohichnyi Zhurnal 2–3, 115–22.Google Scholar
Knoll, AH, Grotzinger, JP, Kaufman, AJ and Kolosov, P (1995a) Integrated approaches to terminal Proterozoic stratigraphy: an example from the Olenek Uplift, north-eastern Siberia. Precambrian Research 73, 251–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knoll, AH, Kaufman, AJ, Semikhatov, MA, Grotzinger, JP and Adams, W (1995b) Sizing up the sub-Tommotian unconformity in Siberia. Geology 23, 1139–43.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Korovnikov, IV (2002) New data on biostratigraphy of the Lower and Middle Cambrian series in the northeastern Siberian Platform (section of the Khorbosuonka River, Olenek uplift). Russian Geology and Geophysics 43, 826–36.Google Scholar
Korovnikov, IV and Novozhilova, NV (2012) New biostratigraphical constraints on the Lower and lower Middle Cambrian of the Kharaulakh Mountains (northeastern Siberian Platform, Chekurovka anticline). Russian Geology and Geophysics 53, 776–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kouchinsky, A, Bengtson, S, Gallet, Y, Korovnikov, I, Pavlov, V, Runnegar, B, Shields, G, Veizer, J, Young, E and Ziegler, K (2008) The SPICE carbone isotope excursion in Siberia: a combined study of the Middle Cambrian–lowermost Ordovician Kulyumbe River section, northwestern Siberian Platform. Geological Magazine 145, 609–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kouchinsky, A, Bengtson, S, Landing, E, Steiner, M, Vendrasco, M and Ziegler, K (2017) Terreneuvian stratigraphy and faunas from the Anabar Uplift, Siberia. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 62, 311440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kouchinsky, A, Bengtson, S, Missarzhevsky, VV, Pelechaty, S, Torssander, P and Val’kov, AK (2001) Carbon isotope stratigraphy and the problem of a pre-Tommotian Stage in Siberia. Geological Magazine 138, 387–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kouchinsky, A, Bengtson, S, Pavlov, V, Runnegar, B, Torssander, P, Young, E and Ziegler, K (2007) Carbon isotope stratigraphy of the Precambrian-Cambrian Sukharikha River section, northwestern Siberian platform. Geological Magazine 144, 609–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kouchinsky, A, Bengtson, S, Pavlov, V, Runnegar, B, Val’kov, A and Young, E (2005) Pre-Tommotian age of the lower Pestrotsvet Formation in the Selinde section on the Siberian platform: carbon isotopic evidence. Geological Magazine 142, 319–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasnov, VI , Savitsky, VE , Tesakov, YuI and Khomentovsky, VV (eds) (1983) Resolutions of the All-Union Meeting on Precambrian, Palaeozoic, and Quaternary Stratigraphy of Central Siberia (Novosibirsk, 1979), Part 1 (Upper Precambrian, Lower Palaeozoic). Novosibirsk: USSR Interdepartmental Stratigraphic Committee, 216 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Landing, E (1988) Lower Cambrian of Eastern Massachusetts: stratigraphy and small shelly fossils. Journal of Paleontology 62, 661–95.Google Scholar
Landing, E, Geyer, G, Brasier, MD and Bowring, SA (2013) Cambrian evolutionary radiation: context, correlation, and chronostratigraphy – overcoming deficiencies of the first appearance datum (FAD) concept. Earth-Science Reviews 123, 133–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landing, E and Kouchinsky, A (2016) Correlation of the Cambrian evolutionary radiation: geochronology, evolutionary stasis of earliest Cambrian (Terreneuvian) small shelly fossil (SSF) taxa, and chronostratigraphic significance. Geological Magazine 153, 750–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landing, E, Myrow, P, Benus, AP and Narbonne, GM (1989) The Placentian Series: appearance of the oldest skeletized faunas in southeastern Newfoundland. Journal of Paleontology 63, 739–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, D, Ling, H-F, Shields-Zhou, GA, Chen, X, Cremonese, L, Och, L, Thirlwall, M and Manning, CJ (2013) Carbon and strontium isotope evolution of seawater across the Ediacaran-Cambrian transition: Evidence from the Xiaotan section, NE Yunnan, South China. Precambrian Research 225, 128–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magaritz, M (1989) δ13C minima follow extinction events: a clue to faunal radiation. Geology 17, 337–40.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magaritz, M, Holser, WT and Kirschvink, JL (1986) Carbon isotope events across the Precambrian/Cambrian boundary on the Siberian Platform. Nature 320, 258–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magaritz, M, Kirshvink, JL, Latham, AJ, Zhuravlev, AYu and Rozanov, AYu (1991) Precambrian/Cambrian boundary problem: carbon isotope correlations for Vendian and Tommotian time between Siberia and Morocco. Geology 19, 847–50.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maloof, AC, Porter, SM, Moore, JL, Dudás, FӦ., Bowring, SA, Higgins, JA, Fike, DA and Eddy, MP (2010a) The earliest Cambrian record of animals and ocean geochemical change. GSA Bulletin 122, 1731–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maloof, AC, Ramezani, J, Bowring, SA, Fike, DA, Porter, SM and Mazouad, M (2010b) Constraints on early Cambrian carbon cycling from the duration of the Nemakit-Daldynian–Tommotian boundary δ13C shift, Morocco. Geology 38, 623–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mángano, MG and Buatois, LA (2014) Decoupling of body-plandiversification and ecological structuring during the Ediacaran-Cambrian transition: evolutionary and geobiological feedbacks. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 281, 20140038.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mángano, MG and Buatois, LA (2017) The Cambrian revolutions: trace-fossil record, timing, links and geobiological impact. Earth-Science Reviews 173, 96108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marusin, VV and Grazhdankin, DV (2018) Enigmatic large-sized tubular fossils from the Terreneuvian of Arctic Siberia. PalZ 92, 557–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesezhnikov, MS (1969) Zonal stratigraphy and zoogeography of marine basins. Geologiya i Geofuzika 7, 4553 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Meshkova, NP , Zhuravleva, IT and Luchinina, VA (1973) Lower Cambrian and the lower part of the Middle Cambrian of the Olenek Uplift. In Problems of Palaeontology and Biostratigraphy in the Lower Cambrian of Siberia and the Far-East (ed. Zhuravleva, IT), pp. 194214. Novosibirsk: Nauka (in Russian).Google Scholar
Missarzhevsky, VV (1980) Precambrian–Cambrian boundary strata in the western slope of the Olenek Uplift (Olenek River). Byulleten’ Moskovskogo Obshchestva Ispytatelei Prirody (Otdel Geologicheskii) 55, 2334 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Missarzhevsky, VV (1982) Subdivision and correlation of Precambrian–Cambrian boundary strata based on various ancient groups of skeletal organisms. Byulleten’ Moskovskogo Obshchestva Ispytatelei Prirody (Otdel Geologicheskii) 57, 5267 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Missarzhevsky, VV (1983) Stratigraphy of the oldest Phanerozoic strata of the Anabar Massif. Sovetskaya Geologiya 9, 6273 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Missarzhevsky, VV (1989) Oldest Skeletal Fossils and Stratigraphy of Precambrian and Cambrian Boundary Strata. Moscow: Nauka, 237 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Missarzhevsky, VV and Rozanov, AYu (1965) Fossil biota of the Precambrian/Cambrian boundary strata and the criteria for definition of the lower Cambrian and lower Palaeozoic boundary. In Proceedings of the All-Union Symposium on Precambrian and Early Cambrian Palaeontology, Novosibirsk, 25–30 October 1965, Abstracts. Novosibirsk, pp. 92–3. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Moczydłowska, M (1991) Acritarch biostratigraphy of the Lower Cambrian and the Precambrian–Cambrian boundary in the southeastern Poland. Fossils and Strata 29, 1127.Google Scholar
Moczydłowska, M and Vidal, G (1988) How old is Tommotian? Geology 16, 166–8.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, AM and Salvador, A (1999) International stratigraphic guide – an abridged version. Episodes 22, 255–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagovitsin, KE, Rogov, VI, Marusin, VV, Karlova, GA, Kolesnikov, AV, Bykova, NV and Grazhdankin, DV (2015) Revised Neoproterozoic and Terreneuvian stratigraphy of the Lena-Anabar Basin and north-western slope of the Olenek Uplift, Siberian Platform. Precambrian Research 270, 226–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogurtsova, RN (1975) Lontova acritarchs in Tommotian strata of the Olenek Uplift. Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR. Seriya Geologicheskaya 11, 84–9 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Oppel, A (1856–1858) Die Juraformation Englands, Frankreichs und des Südweslichen Deutschlands. Stuttgart: Bner and Seubert, 857 pp.Google Scholar
Page, K (2017) From Oppel to Callomon (and beyond): building a high-resolution ammonite-based biochronology for the Jurassic System. Lethaia 50, 336–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palacios, T, Jensen, S, Barr, SM, White, CE and Miller, RF (2011) New biostratigraphical constraints on the Lower Cambrian Ratcliffe Brook Formation, southern New Brunswick, Canada, from organic-walled microfossils. Stratigraphy 8, 4560.Google Scholar
Parkhaev, PYu and Karlova, GA (2011) Taxonomic revision and evolution of Cambrian mollusks of the genus Aldanella Vostokova, 1962 (Gastropoda: Archaeobranchia). Paleontological Journal 45, 1145–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkhaev, PYu, Karlova, GA and Rozanov, AYu (2011) Taxonomy, stratigraphy and biogeography of Aldanella attleborensis – a possible candidate for defining the base of Cambrian Stage 2. Museum of Northern Arizona Bulletin 67, 298300.Google Scholar
Peng, S and Babcock, LE (2011) Continuing progress on chronostratigraphic subdivision of the Cambrian System. Bulletin of Geosciences 86, 391–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, S , Babcock, LE and Cooper, RA (2012) The Cambrian Period. In The Geologic Time Scale 2012 (eds Gradstein, FM, Ogg, JG, Schmitz, MD and Ogg, GM), pp. 437–88. Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokopiev, AV, Khudoley, AK, Koroleva, OV, Kazakova, GG, Lokhov, DK, Malyshev, SV, Zaitsev, AI, Roev, SP, Sergeev, SA, Berezhnaya, NG and Vasiliev, DA (2016) The Early Cambrian bimodal volcanism in the northeastern Siberian Craton. Russian Geology and Geophysics 57, 155–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remane, J, Bassett, MG, Cowie, JW, Gohrbandt, KH, Lane, HR, Michelsen, O and Naiwen, W (1996) Revised guidelines for the establishment of global chronostratigraphic standards by the International Commission on Stratigraphy (ICS). Episodes 19, 7781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Repina, LN , Lazarenko, NP , Meshkova, NP , Korshunov, VI , Nikiforov, NI and Aksarina, NA (1974) Lower Cambrian Biostratigraphy and Fauna of the Kharaulakh Ranges (Tuora-Sis Range). Moscow: Nauka, 299 pp.Google Scholar
Rogov, VI, Karlova, GA, Marusin, VV, Kochnev, BB, Nagovitsin, KE and Grazhdankin, DV (2015) Duration of the first biozone in the Siberian hypostratotype of the Vendian. Russian Geology and Geophysics 56, 501–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozanov, AYu, Khomentovsky, VV, Shabanov, YuYa, Karlova, GA, Varlamov, AI, Luchinina, VA, Pegel’, TV, Demidenko, YuE, Parkhaev, PYu, Korovnikov, IV and Skorlotova, NA (2008) To the problem of stage subdivision of the Lower Cambrian. Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation 16, 119.Google Scholar
Rozanov, AYu and Missarzhevsky, VV (1966) Biostratigraphy and Fauna of Lower Cambrian Horizons. Moscow: Nauka, 120 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Rozanov, AYu , Missarzhevsky, VV , Volkova, NA , Voronova, LG , Krylov, IN , Keller, BM , Korolyuk, IK , Lendzion, K , Michniak, R , Pyhova, NG and Sidorov, AD (1969) The Tommotian Stage and the Cambrian Lower Boundary Problem. Moscow: Nauka, 380 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Rozanov, AYu , Repina, LN , Appolonov, MK , Shabanov, YuYa , Zhuravlev, AYu , Pegel, TV , Fedorov, AB , Astashkin, VA , Zhuravleva, IT , Egorova, LI , Chugaeva, MN , Dubinina, SV , Ermak, VV , Esakova, NV , Sundukov, VV , Sukhov, SS and Zhemchuzhnikov, VG (1992) Cambrian of Siberia. Novosibirsk: Nauka, Siberian Branch, 135 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Rozanov, AYu and Sokolov, BS (1980) The problem of the Precambrian–Cambrian boundary. Geological Magazine 117, 23–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozanov, AYu and Sokolov, BS (1982) Precambrian-Cambrian boundary: recent state of knowledge. Precambrian Research 17, 125–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozanov, AYu and Zhuravlev, AYu (1992) The Lower Cambrian fossil record of the Soviet Union. In Origin and Early Evolution of the Metazoa (eds Lipps, JH and Signor, PW), pp. 205–82. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudavskaya, VA and Vasilieva, NI (1985) Acritarchs and skeletal problematic fossils from boundary strata of the Vendian and the Tommotian and Atdabanian stages. In Late Precambrian Early Palaeozoic Stratigraphy of the Siberian Platform (eds Kokoulin, ML and Rudavskaya, VA), pp. 51–7. Leningrad: VNIGRI (in Russian).Google Scholar
Scott, GH (2013) Biostratigraphy: Interpretations of Oppel’s zones. Earth-Science Reviews 126, 266–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shpunt, BP (1987) Late Precambrian Riftogenesis of the Siberian Platform: Analysis of Tectonics and Sedimentary Formations. Yakutsk: Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 139 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Slater, BJ, Harvey, THP, Guilbaud, R and Butterfield, NJ (2017) A cryptic record of Burgess Shale-type diversity from the early Cambrian of Baltica. Palaeontology 60, 117–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokolov, BS (1974) The problem of the boundary between the Precambrian and Cambrian. Geologiya i Geofizika (Soviet Geology and Geophysics) 15, 329 (1–22).Google Scholar
Sokolov, BS (1984) The Vendian System and its position in the stratigraphic scale. In Proceedings of the 27th International Geological Congress, Volume 1, Stratigraphy. VNU Science Press BV, Utrecht, Netherlands, pp. 241–69.Google Scholar
Sokolov, BS (1990) The Vendian System: historical-geological and paleontological substantiation. In The Vendian System, Volume 2, Regional Geology (eds Sokolov, BS and Fedonkin, MA), pp. 226–42. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokolov, BS (1995) The Vendian System and “Neoproterozoic-III”. Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation 3, 575–90.Google Scholar
Sokolov, BS and Fedonkin, MA (1984) The Vendian System as the terminal system of the Precambrian. Episodes 7, 12–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spizharski, TN, Zhuravleva, IT, Repina, LN, Rozanov, AYu, Tchernysheva, NYe and Ergaliev, GH (1986) The stage scale of the Cambrian System. Geological Magazine 123, 387–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidal, G, Moczydłowska, M and Rudavskaya, VR (1995) Constraints on the early Cambrian radiation and correlation of the Tommotian and Nemakit-Daldynian regional stages of eastern Siberia. Journal of the Geological Society, London 152, 499510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidal, G, Palacios, T, Moczydłowska, M and Gubanov, AP (1999) Age constraints from small shelly fossils on the early Cambrian terminal Cadomian Phase in Iberia. GFF 121, 137–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vishnevskaya, IA, Letnikova, EF, Vetrova, NI, Kochnev, BB and Dril, SI (2017) Chemostratigraphy and detrital zircon geochronology of the Neoproterozoic Khorbusuonka Group, Olenek Uplift, northeastern Siberian platform. Gondwana Research 51, 255–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zang, W-L, Moczydłowska, M and Jago, JB (2007) Early Cambrian acritarch assemblage zones in South Australia and global correlation. Memoirs of the Association of Australasian Palaeontologists 33, 141–77.Google Scholar
Zhamoida, AI (ed.) (1983) Decrees of the Interdepartmental Stratigraphic Committee and the Associated Permanent Commissions, Issue 21. St Petersburg: VSEGEI, 74 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Zhamoida, AI (ed.) (2000) Supplements to the Stratigraphic Code of Russia. St Petersburg: VSEGEI, 109 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Zinchenko, VN (1985) Local stratigraphic subdivisions of the Cambrian of northeastern Siberian Platform. In Late Precambrian and Early Palaeozoic Stratigraphy. Collection of Research Papers. VNIGRI, Leningrad, pp. 1522 (in Russian).Google Scholar