Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T22:34:59.758Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of Deformation Mechanisms at Mineral-Protein Composite Interface Using Steered Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Dinesh R. Katti
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105, USA
Pijush Ghosh
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105, USA
Kalpana Katti
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105, USA
Get access

Abstract

In the area of clay-polymer nanocomposites, recently montmorillonite is extensively used because of its unique characteristics of swelling. In this work, steered molecular dynamics is used to evaluate the mechanical behavior of a new class of nanocomposites, using amino acids to intercalate clay interlayers. Two positively charged amino acids, lysine and arginine, are used here. Our simulation indicates that both the amino acids have preferred orientation inside the clay interlayer. Our simulations also indicate that the clay-amino acid interlayer is about three times stiffer under tension as compared to under compression. On the other hand, dry montmorillonite shows similar stiffness under tension and compression. The fundamental mechanism of deformation during tension and compression is intrinsically different in the amino acid-clay composite. The stress-strain behavior of this clay-amino acid interlayer is predominantly linear until a stress of 1.5 GPa. This study is a first step towards the potential use of biomacromolecules as modifiers in clay nanocomposites.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Pramanik, M., Srivastava, S.K., Biswas, K.S., Bhowmick, A.K., J Appl Poly Sci 87, 2216 (2003).Google Scholar
2. Maiti, P., Yamada, K., Okamoto, M., Ueda, K., Okamoto, K., Chem Mater 14, 4654 (2002).Google Scholar
3. Wang, D., Wilkie, C.A., Poly Degradation and Stability 80, 171 (2003).Google Scholar
4. Lim, S.T., Lee, C.H., Choi, H.J., Jhon, M.S., J Poly Sci: Part B: Poly Physics 41, 2052 (2003).Google Scholar
5. Park, H.M., Lee, W.K., Park, C.Y., Cho, W.J., Ha, C.S., J Mat Sci 38, 909 (2003).Google Scholar
6. Accelrys Inc. Insight II (2000).Google Scholar
7. Van Olphen, H., Fritpiat, J., eds. Data Handbook for Clay Materials and other Non-metallic Minerals, Pergamon Press, New York (1979).Google Scholar
8. Skipper, N.T., Chang, F.R., Sposito, G., Clays Clay Miner 43(3), 294 (1995).Google Scholar
9. Kalé, L., Skeel, R., Bhandarka, M., Brunner, R., Gursoy, A., Krawetz, N., Philips, J., Shinozaki, A., Varadrajan, K., Schulten, K., J Comp Phys 151, 283 (1999).Google Scholar
11. http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/vmd/ and Humphrey, W., Dalke, A., Schulten, K., J Molec Graphics 14(1), 33 (1996).Google Scholar
12. Shu-Tung, Li, Biologic Biomaterials, ed. Park, J.B. and Bronzino, J.D., Biomaterials: Principles and Applications, CRC Press, NY (2003).Google Scholar