Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T22:29:18.849Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Litter as a filter of emergence for herbaceous seedlings and sporophytes in central Amazonia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2012

Flávio Rogério de Oliveira Rodrigues  and
Flávia Regina Capellotto Costa
Flávio Rogério de Oliveira Rodrigues*
Affiliation:
Graduate Program in Ecology, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Avenida Efigênio Salles, 2239, Adrianópolis, CEP 69011-970, Manaus, AM, Brazil
Flávia Regina Capellotto Costa
Affiliation:
Coordenação de Pesquisas em Biodiversidade, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Avenida Efigênio Salles, 2239, Adrianópolis, CEP 69011-970, Manaus, AM, Brazil
*
1Corresponding author. Email: frdor85@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

We conducted a study in 30 plots distributed uniformly in an area of 25 km2 at Ducke Reserve, Manaus, to test the hypothesis that understorey herb richness and abundance are mediated by litter, manipulating experimentally the amount of litter in the field. Over 10 mo, we followed the emergence of herbaceous seedlings and sporophytes in control, litter-addition and litter-exclusion treatments, covering an area of 1.2 m2 per plot in each treatment. We also assessed the relationship between topography and litter depth and frequency of bare-soil patches; and the influence of density of reproductive individuals on the emergence of herbs. Litter depth decreased, and the frequency of bare-soil patches increased with terrain slope in the wet season, but were not related with the soil clay content. Neither was related to the topography in the dry season. Emergence of pteridophytes was four times higher in the litter-exclusion treatment (3.7 ± 1.1 individuals m−2) than in the litter-addition treatment (0.9 ± 0.28 indiv. m−2) and increased with soil clay content. Seedlings from monocot herbs emerged twice more frequently in the litter exclusion (0.71 ± 0.25 indiv. m−2) than in the litter-addition treatment (0.33 ± 0.11 indiv. m−2), and also more in sites with high density of fruiting plants. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that regeneration of herbs with very small propagules is strongly affected by the physical barrier imposed by litter. Given that litter is shallower on slopes during the wet season, this creates a pattern of higher density and richness of pteridophytes in these areas. Monocot herbs, although also limited by litter, were more highly limited by availability of propagules, and their distribution patterns are at least in part explained by dispersal limitation. We conclude that litter is an important causal factor behind the herb distribution patterns along topographical gradients.

Keywords

germinationplant distributionpteridophytessafe micrositestopographywater availabilityZingiberales
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 28 , Issue 5 , September 2012 , pp. 445 - 452
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

BANKS, J. A. 1999. Gametophyte development in ferns. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 50:163–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BECKER, P., RABENOLD, P. E., IDOL, J. R. & SMITH, A. P. 1988. Water potential gradients for gaps and slopes in a Panamanian tropical moist forest's dry season. Journal of Tropical Ecology 4:173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BELL, G. 2001. Neutral macroecology. Science 293:2413–2418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BENÍTEZ-MALVIDO, J. & KOSSMANN-FERRAZ, I. D. 1999. Litter cover variability affects seedling performance and herbivory. Biotropica 31:598–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BOSY, J. L. & READER, R. J. 1995. Mechanisms underlying the suppression of forb seedling emergence by grass (Poa pratensis) litter. Functional Ecology 9:635–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BREARLEY, F. Q., PRESS, M. C. & SCHOLES, J. D. 2003. Nutrients obtained from leaf litter can improve the growth of dipterocarp seedlings. New Phytologist 160:101–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BRUNA, E. M. 1999. Seed germination in rain forest fragments. Nature 402:139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BRUNA, E. M. 2002. Effects of forest fragmentation on Heliconia acuminata seedling recruitment in central Amazonia. Oecologia 132:235–243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BRUNA, E. M. & RIBEIRO, M. B. N. 2005. Regeneration and population structure of Heliconia acuminata in Amazonian secondary forests with contrasting land-use histories. Journal of Tropical Ecology 21:127–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CHAUVEL, A., LUCAS, Y. & BOULET, R., 1987. On the genesis of the soil mantle of the region of Manaus, central Amazonia, Brazil. Experientia 43:234–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CINTRA, R. 1997. Leaf litter effects on seed and seedling predation of the palm Astrocaryum murumuru and the legume tree Diptryx micrantha in Amazonian forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology 13:709–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CLARK, D. B., CLARK, D. A. & READ, J. M. 1998. Edaphic variation and the mesoscale distribution of tree species in a neotropical rain forest. Journal of Ecology 86:101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CLARK, D. B., PALMER, M. W. & CLARK, D. A. 1999. Edaphic factors and the landscape-scale distributions of tropical rain forest trees. Ecology 80:2662–2675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
COMITA, L. S. & ENGELBRECHT, B. M. J. 2009. Seasonal and spatial variation in water availability drive habitat associations in a tropical forest. Ecology 90:2755–2765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
COSTA, F. R. C. 2006. Mesoscale gradients of herb richness and abundance in central Amazonia. Biotropica 38:711–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
COSTA, F. R. C. & MAGNUSSON, W. E. 2010. The need for large-scale, integrated studies of biodiversity – the experience of the Program for Biodiversity Research in Brazilian Amazonia. Natureza & Conservação 8:3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
COSTA, F. R. C., MAGNUSSON, W. E. & LUIZÃO, R. C. C. 2005. Mesoscale distribution patterns of Amazonian understorey herbs in relation to topography, soil and watersheds. Journal of Ecology 93:863–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DAVIDSE, G., JUDZIEWICZ, E. J. & ZULOAGA, F. O. 2004. Poaceae. Pp. 1–297 in Berry, P. E., Yatskievych, K. & Holst, B. K. (eds.). Flora of the Venezuelan Guayana. Volume 8. Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis.Google Scholar
DAWS, M. I., PEARSON, T. R. H., BURSLEM, D. F. R. P., MULLINS, C. E. & DALLING, J. W. 2005. Effects of topographic position, leaf litter and seed size on seedling demography in a semideciduous tropical forest in Panamá. Plant Ecology 179:93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DRUCKER, D. P., COSTA, F. R. C. & MAGNUSSON, W. E. 2008. How wide is the riparian zone of small streams in tropical forests? A test with terrestrial herbs. Journal of Tropical Ecology 24:65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EHRLÉN, J. & ERIKSSON, O. 2000. Dispersal limitation and patch occupancy in forest herbs. Ecology 81:1667–1674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ENGELBRECHT, B. M. J., COMITA, L. S., CONDIT, R., KURSAR, T. A., TYREE, M. T., TURNER, B. L. & HUBBELL, S. P. 2007. Drought sensitivity shapes species distribution patterns in tropical forests. Nature 447:80–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FACELLI, J. M. 1994. Multiple indirect effects of plant litter affect the establishment of woody seedlings in old fields. Ecology 75:1727–1735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FACELLI, J. M. & PICKETT, S. T. A. 1991a. Plant litter: light interception and effects on an old-field plant community. Ecology 72:1024–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FACELLI, J. M. & PICKETT, S. T. A. 1991b. Plant litter: its dynamics and effects on plant community structure. The Botanical Review 57:1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FOWLER, N. L. 1988. What is a safe site? Neighbor, litter, germination date, and patch effects. Ecology 69:947–961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FURUYA, M., KANNO, M., OKAMOTO, H., FULUDA, S. & WADA, M. 1997. Control of mitosis by phytochrome and a blue-light receptor in fern spores. Plant Physiology 113:677–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GALE, N. 2000. The relationship between canopy gaps and topography in a western Ecuadorian rain forest. Biotropica 32:653–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GARCÍA-GUZMÁN, G. & BENITEZ-MALVIDO, J. 2003. Effect of litter on the incidence of leaf-fungal pathogens and herbivory in seedlings of the tropical tree Nectandra ambigens. Journal of Tropical Ecology 19:171–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GENTRY, A. H. 1988. Chances in plant community diversity and floristic composition on environmental and geographical gradients. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 75:1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GENTRY, A. H. & EMMONS, L. H. 1987. Geographical variation in fertility and composition of the understory of Neotropical forests. Biotropica 19:216–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HOVSTAD, K. A. & OHLSON, M. 2009. Conspecific versus heterospecific litter on seedling establishment. Plant Ecology 204:33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HUBBELL, S. P. 2001. The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton Monographs in Population Biology. Princeton University Press, Princeton. 375 pp.Google Scholar
JENSEN, K. & GUTEKUNST, K. 2003. Effects of litter on establishment of grassland plant species: the role of seed size and successional status. Basic and Applied Ecology 4:579–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KENNEDY, H., ANDERSON, L. G. & HAGBERG, M. 1988. Marantaceae. Pp. 1–191 in Harling, G. & Andersson, L. (ed.). Flora of Ecuador. Volume 32 – Part 224. Botanical Institute, University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar
LUIZÃO, F. J. & SCHUBART, H. O. R. 1987. Litter production and decomposition in a terra-firme forest of Central Amazonia. Experientia 43:259–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LUIZÃO, R. C. C., LUIZÃO, F. J., PAIVA, R. Q., MONTEIRO, T. F., SOUZA, L. S. & KRUIJTS, B. 2004. Variation of carbon and nitrogen cycling processes along a topographic gradient in a central Amazonia forest. Global Change Biology 10:92–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MAGNUSSON, W. E., LIMA, A. P., LUIZÃO, R. C. C., LUIZÃO, F., COSTA, F. R. C., CASTILHO, C. V. & KINUPP, V. F. 2005. RAPELD: a modification of the Gentry method for biodiversity surveys in long-term ecological research sites. Biota Neotropica 5 (2). http://www.biotaneotropica.org.br/v5n2/pt/abstract?point-of-view+bn01005022005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MARIMON-JÚNIOR, B. H. & HAY, J. D. 2008. A new instrument for measurement and collection of quantitative samples of the litter layer in forests. Forest Ecology and Management 255:2244–2250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MARQUES-FILHO, A. O., RIBEIRO, M. N. G. & SANTOS, J. M. 1981. Estudos climatológicos da Reserva Florestal Ducke, Manaus, AM. IV – Precipitação. Acta Amazonica 4:759–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
METCALFE, D. J. & GRUBB, P. J. 1997. The responses to shade of seedlings of very small-seeded tree and shrub species from tropical rain forest in Singapore. Functional Ecology 11:215–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
METCALFE, D. J. & TURNER, I. M. 1998. Soil seed bank from lowland rain forest in Singapore: canopy-gap and litter-gap demanders. Journal of Tropical Ecology 14:103–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PAGE, C. 2002. Ecological strategies in fern evolution: a neopteridological overview. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 119:1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PAOLI, G. D., CURRAN, L. M. & ZAK, D. R. 2006. Soil nutrients and beta diversity in the Bornean Dipterocarpaceae: evidence for niche partitioning by tropical rain forest trees. Journal of Ecology 94:157–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PÉREZ-GARCÍA, B., MENDOZA-RUIZ, A., SÁNCHEZ-CORONADO, M. E. & OROZCO-SEGOVIA, A. 2007. Effect of light and temperature on germination of spores of four tropical fern species. Acta Oecologica 32:171–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
POULSEN, A. D. 1996. Species richness and density of ground herbs within a plot of lowland rainforest in northwest Borneo. Journal of Tropical Ecology 12:177–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
QUESADA, C. A., LLOYD, J., ANDERSON, L. O., FYLLAS, N. M., SCHWARZ, M. & CZIMEZIK, C. I. 2011. Soils of Amazonian with particular reference to the RAINFOR sites. Biogeosciences 8:1415–1440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RIBEIRO, J. E. L. S., HOPKINS, M. J. G., VICENTINI, A., SOTHERS, C. A., COSTA, M. A. S., BRITO, J. M., SOUZA, M. A. D., MARTINS, L. H. P., LOHMANN, L. G., ASSUNÇÃO, P. A. C., PEREIRA, E. C., SILVA, C. F., MESQUITA, M. R. & PROCóPIO, L. 1999. Flora da Reserva Ducke: Guia de identificação das plantas vasculares de uma floresta de terra firme na Amazônia central. INPA/DFID, Manaus. 816 pp.Google Scholar
SAYER, E. J. 2006. Using experimental manipulation to assess the roles of leaf litter in the functioning of forest ecosystems. Biological Reviews 81:1–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SCHIMPF, D. J. & DANZ, N. P. 1999. Light passage through leaf litter: variation among northern hardwood trees. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 97:103–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SIMPSON, D. A. 2006. Flora da Reserva Ducke, Amazonas, Brasil: Cyperaceae. Rodriguésia 57:171–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SYDES, C. L. & GRIME, J. P. 1981. Effects of tree leaf litter on herbaceous vegetation in the deciduous woodlands. I. Field investigations. Journal of Ecology 69:237–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TAKYU, M., AIBA, S. I. & KITAYAMA, K. 2003. Changes in biomass, productivity and decomposition along topographical gradients under different geological conditions in tropical lower montane forests on Mount Kinabalu, Borneo. Oecologia 134:397–404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
TÓTA, J. 2009. Estudo da advecção horizontal de CO2 em florestas na Amazônia e sua influência no balanço de Carbono. Ph.D. thesis, INPA/UEA, Manaus.Google Scholar
TUOMISTO, H. & POULSEN, A. D. 1996. Influence of edaphic specialization on pteridophyte distribution in Neotropical rain forests. Journal of Biogeography 23:283–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TUOMISTO, H., RUOKOLAINEN, K., AGUILAR, M. & SARMIENTO, A. 2003. Floristic patterns along a 43-km long transect in an Amazonian rain forest. Journal of Ecology 91:743–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VÁZQUEZ-YANES, C., OROZCO-SEGOVIA, A., RINCÓN, E., SANCHEZ-CORONADO, M. E., HUANTE, P., TOLEDO, J. R. & BARRADAS, V. L. 1990. Light beneath the litter in a tropical forest: effect on seed germination. Ecology 71:1952–1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WADA, M. 2007. The fern as a model system to study photomorphogenesis. Journal of Plant Research 120:3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WRIGHT, S. J. 2002. Plant diversity in tropical forests: a review of mechanisms of species coexistence. Oecologia 130:1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
XIONG, S. & NILSSON, C. 1999. The effects of plant litter on vegetation: a meta-analysis. Journal of Ecology 87:984–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ZUQUIM, G., COSTA, F. R. C., PRADO, J. & BRAGA-NETO, R. 2009. Distribution of pteridophyte communities along environmental gradients in central Amazonia, Brazil. Biodiversity and Conservation 18:151–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar