Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-r7xzm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T08:48:06.080Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tensions as Resources in Jewish Historical Civilizational Experience*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2009

Shmuel N. Eisenstadt*
Affiliation:
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem and The Van Leer Jerusalem Institute [miriamb@vanleer.org.il].
Get access

Abstract

The article analyzes in a comparative framework the Jewish historical experience as a distinct – the first monotheistic – Axial civilization and the major characteristics thereof. Special emphasis is given to the multivalence of the major components of the cultural orientations, collective consciousness and institutional premises as they bear on its long historical continuity and their major carriers, including heterodoxies. The article points out some of the major differences of the modern Jewish historical experience as compared with medieval history.

Résumé

L'article analyse en perspective comparée l'expérience historique juive, civilisation axiale particulière – la première qui soit monothéiste – et ses caractéristiques principales. Il accorde une importance particulière à la pluralité de sens des principales composantes de la culture, de la conscience collective et des dispositions institutionnelles, porteuses dans une longue continuité historique même des hétérodoxies. Il finit avec une mise en évidence de quelques-unes des différences majeures entre l'expérience juive contemporaine comparée à son histoire médiévale.

Zusammenfassung

Die vergleichende Studie widmet sich der geschichtlichen jüdischen Erfahrung, eine besondere axiale Kultur – die erste monotheistische – und ihre Besonderheiten. Ein großer Platz wird der Sinnesvielfalt der wichtigsten kulturellen Komponenten, des Gemeinschaftsinns und institutionnellen Prämissen eingeräumt, die über einen langen historischen Zeitraum Träger der Heterodoxie sind. Der Aufsatz endet mit einem Vergleich der größten Unterschiede zwischen der jüdischen Gegenwartserfahrung und seiner mittelalterlichen Komponente.

Type
Jewish Institutions and Practices
Copyright
Copyright © A.E.S. 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arendt, Hannah, 1978. The Jew as Pariah. Jewish Identity and Politics in the Modern Age (New York, Grove Press).Google Scholar
Arnason, Johann P., Eisenstadt, Shmuel N. and Wittrock, Björn, eds., 2005. Axial Civilizations and World History (Leiden, Brill).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Assmann, Jan, 1995. Egyptian Solar Religion in the New Kingdom. Re, Amun and the Crisis of Polytheism (London, Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Assmann, Jan, 1997. Moses the Egyptian. The Memory of Egypt in Western Monotheism (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baer, Yitzhak F., [1947] 2000. Galout. L'Imaginaire de l'exil dans le judaïsme (Paris, Calmann-Levy).Google Scholar
Ben-Sasson, Haim Hillel, 1969. On Jewish History in the Middle Ages (Tel Aviv, Am Oved [in Hebrew]).Google Scholar
Ben-Sasson, Haim Hillel, 1984. “Diaspora in Israel”, in Ben-Sasson, Haim Hillel, Continuity and Change (Tel Aviv, Am Oved [in Hebrew]).Google Scholar
Birnbaum, Pierre and Katznelson, Ira, eds., 1995. Paths of Emancipation. Jews, States and Citizenship (Princeton, Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Cohen, Gershon, 1967. Messianic Postures of Ashkenazim and Sephardim (Prior to Shabbethai Zvi). Leo Baeck Lecture (New York, Leo Baeck Institute).Google Scholar
Cohen, Gershon, 1991. Studies in the Variety of Rabbinic Cultures (New York, The Jewish Publication Society of America).Google Scholar
Dubnov, Simon, [1925-1929] 1967-1973. History of the Jews (South Brunswick, Yoseloff).Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, Shmuel N., ed., 1986. The Origins and Diversity of Axial Age Civilizations (Albany, State University of New York Press).Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, Shmuel N., 1996. Japanese Civilization. A Comparative View (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, Shmuel N., 1999a. Fundamentalism, Sectarianism and Revolution. The Jacobin Dimension of Modernity (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, Shmuel N., 1999b. Paradoxes of Democracy. Fragility, Continuity and Change (Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, Shmuel N., 2004a. Explorations in Jewish Historical Experience. The Civilizational Dimension (Leiden, Brill).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenstadt, Shmuel N., 2004b. “The Jewish Historical Experience in the Framework of Comparative Universal History”, in Eisenstadt, Shmuel N., Explorations in Jewish Historical Experience. The Civilizational Dimension (Leiden, Brill, pp. 45-84).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenstadt, Shmuel N., 2004c. “The Jewish Experience in the Modern Era”, in Eisenstadt, Shmuel N., Explorations in Jewish Historical Experience. The Civilizational Dimension (Leiden, Brill, pp. 85-101).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenstadt, Shmuel N., 2004d. “Did Zionism Bring the Jews Back to History?”, in Eisenstadt, Shmuel N., Explorations in Jewish Historical Experience. The Civilizational Dimension (Leiden, Brill, pp. 105-121).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erder, Yoram, 1994. “The Karaites Sadducee Dilemma”, Israel Oriental Studies, 14, pp. 195-215.Google Scholar
Erder, Yoram, 1995. “The Centrality of Eretz Israel among Ancient Karaism according to Mishwaya Al'Aukbari”, Zion, 60, pp. 37-67.Google Scholar
Frankel, Jonathan and Zipperstein, Steven J., eds., 1992. Assimilation and Community. The Jews in Nineteenth-Century Europe (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Funkenstein, Amos, 1993. “Maimonides. Political Theory and Realistic Messianism”, in Funkenstein, Amos, Perceptions of Jewish History (Berkeley, University of California Press, pp. 131-154).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Sylvie Anne, 2008. “Common Law and Jewish Law. The Diasporic Principle of dina de-malkhuta dina”, Behemoth. A Journal on Civilisation, 2, pp. 39-53.Google Scholar
Grosby, Steven, 1991. “Religion and Nationality in Antiquity”, European Journal of Sociology, 32 (2), pp. 229-265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosby, Steven, 1993. “Kinship, Territory and the Nation in the Historiography of Ancient Israel”, Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft, 105, pp. 3-18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosby, Steven, 2002. Biblical Ideas of Nationality – Ancient and Modern (Winona Lake, Eisenbrauns).Google Scholar
Hallamish, Moshe and Ravitzky, Aviezer, eds., 1991. The Land of Israel in Medieval Jewish Thought (Jerusalem, Yad Izhak Ben-Zvi [in Hebrew]).Google Scholar
Horowitz, Elliott, 1994. “‘And It Was Reversed’. Jews and Their Enemies in the Festivities of Purim”, Zion, 59, pp. 129-168 [in Hebrew].Google Scholar
Idel, Moshe, 1988. Kabbalah. New Perspectives (New Haven, Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Jaspers, Karl, 1949. Vom Ursprung und Ziel der Geschichte (Zürich, Artemis/Munich, Piper). English: The Origin and Goal of History (London, Routledge & Kegan Paul/New Haven, Yale University Press, 1953 [trans. Bullock, Michael]).Google Scholar
Kaplan, Yosef, [1982] 1989. From Christianity to Judaism. The Story of Isaac Orobio de Castro (Oxford, Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, Yosef, 2000. An Alternative Path to Modernity. The Western Sephardi Diaspora in the Seventeenth Century (Leiden, Brill).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, David S. and Israel, Jonathan I., eds., 1990. Sceptics, Millenarians and Jews (Leiden, Brill).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Jacob, 1972. Emancipation and Assimilation. Studies in Modern Jewish History (Farnborough, Gregg).Google Scholar
Katz, Jacob, 1982. “The Jewish Diaspora. Minority Positions and Majority Aspirations”, Jerusalem Quarterly, 25, pp. 68-78.Google Scholar
Katz, Jacob, 1984a. “Halakhah and Kabbalah as Competing Fields of Study”, in Katz, Jacob, Halakha and Kabbalah (Jerusalem, Magnes Press, pp. 70-101 [in Hebrew]).Google Scholar
Katz, Jacob, 1984b. “The Rule of the Traditional Halakhah de Facto and de Jure”, in Katz, Jacob, Halakha and Kabbalah (Jerusalem, Magnes Press, pp. 237-255 [in Hebrew]).Google Scholar
Katz, Jacob, ed., 1987. Toward Modernity. The European Jewish Model (New Brunswick, Transaction Books).Google Scholar
Katz, Jacob, [1961] 1993. Tradition and Crisis. Jewish Society at the End of the Middle Ages (New York, New York University Press).Google Scholar
Momigliano, Arnaldo, 1980. “A Note on Max Weber's Definition of Judaism as a Pariah-Religion”, History and Theory, 19, pp. 313-318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Netanyahu, Benzion, 1966. The Marranos of Spain. From the Late 14th to the Early 16th Century (New York, American Academy for Jewish Research).Google Scholar
Roth, Cecil, 1932. A History of the Marranos (Philadelphia, The Jewish Publication Society of America).Google Scholar
Roth, Haim Yehuda, 1936. Al Taamei Hamitzvoth. Ahad Haam Lecture (Jerusalem, Hebrew University [in Hebrew]).Google Scholar
Schatz Uffenheimer, Rivka, 1984. “The Kabbalah – Tradition or Renovation. Historical Discussion and its Consequences”, in Oron, Michal and Goldreich, Amos, eds., Masuot (Jerusalem, Bialik Institute [in Hebrew]).Google Scholar
Schwartz, Daniel R., 1992. “Law and Truth. On Qumran Sadducean and Rabbinic Views of Law”, in Dimant, Devorah and Rappaport, Uriel, eds., The Dead Sea Scrolls. Forty Years of Research (Leiden, Brill, pp. 229-240).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweid, Eliezer, 1979. Homeland and a Land of Promise (Tel Aviv, Am Oved [in Hebrew]).Google Scholar
Stern, Menahem, ed., 1974-1984. Greek and Latin Authors on Jews and Judaism, 3 vols (Jerusalem, Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities).Google Scholar
Toynbee, Arnold J., 1954-1961. A Study of History, 12 vols (London, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Twersky, Isadore, ed., 1972. A Maimonides Reader (New York, Behrman House).Google Scholar
Twersky, Isadore, 1974. “Religion and Law”, in Goitein, S.D., ed., Religion in a Religious Age (Cambridge, Association for Jewish Studies, pp. 69-83).Google Scholar
Twersky, Isadore, 1980. Introduction to the Code of Maimonides (New Haven, Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Twersky, Isadore, 1982. Studies in Jewish Law and Philosophy (New York, KTAV Publishing House).Google Scholar
Twersky, Isadore, 1983a. “Introduction. Jewish Thought in the Sixteenth Century. Problems and Perspectives”, in Dov Cooperman, Bernard, ed., Jewish Thought in the Sixteenth Century (Cambridge, Harvard University Press, pp. ix-xx).Google Scholar
Twersky, Isadore, 1983b. “Talmudists, Philosophers, Kabbalists. The Quest for Spirituality in the Sixteenth Century”, in Dov Cooperman, Bernard, ed., Jewish Thought in the Sixteenth Century (Cambridge, Harvard University Press, pp. 431-459).Google Scholar
Twersky, Isadore, ed., 1991. Studies in Maimonides (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Urbach, Ephraim E., 1975. The Sages. Their Concepts and Beliefs (Jerusalem, Magnes Press).Google Scholar
Weber, Max, 1920-1921. Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie, vol. 1: Die protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus; Die protestantischen Sekten und der Geist des Kapitalismus; Die Wirtschaftsethik der Weltreligionen–part I: Konfuzianismus und Taoismus; vol. 2: Die Wirtschaftsethik der Weltreligionen–part II: Hinduismus und Buddhismus; vol. 3: Die Wirtschaftsethik der Weltreligionen–part III: Das antike Judentum (Tübingen, J.C.B. Mohr).Google Scholar
Werblowsky, R. J. Zwi, 1976. Beyond Tradition and Modernity. Changing Religions in a Changing World (London, Athlone Press).Google Scholar
Yovel, Yirmiyahu, 2009. The Other Within – the Marranos. Split Identity and Emerging Modernity (Princeton, Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuval, Israel J., 1993. “Vengeance and the Curse, Blood and Libel. From Martyrology to Blood Libels”, Zion, 58, pp. 33-99 [in Hebrew].Google Scholar